> You're also always going to have trouble with getting people to ask
> questions, unless the concept of asking for help/guidance has been drilled
> into them as not stupid, but constructive, for a very long time. I'm
> talking life span.
>
Responses people expect are also a barrier to
I just volunteered as a candidate for duty officer, but I had to include one
caveat about a bullet point in the duty officer description: I can't IRC well.
At all. I would be afraid to monitor IRC and be available to answer questions
there because I would be afraid of sending a private
My fellow nerds,
I'm snipping *a lot* but in brief I definitely agree with Julie.
> Kyle’s main issue was really a question about what to do with
> private and anonymous feedback – not that we should avoid it, but rather we
> should discuss how that should be handled. For example,
Woohoo!
-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Esmé
Cowles
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 10:27 AM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Listserv communication
In fact, there is a C4L slack channel: https
uary 26, 2016 10:07 AM
> To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Listserv communication
>
>
> On Feb 26, 2016, at 8:42 AM, Julie Swierczek
> <julie_swierc...@harvard.edu<mailto:julie_swierc...@harvard.edu>> wrote:
>
> We also agreed that listserv
Some notes on participation/inclusion:
1) It can be difficult integrating yourself into a group where you may feel
like more or less of an outsider. An on-boarding experience of some sort -
even so simple as a web page for new users might help. The code4lib website
has little pieces of advice
On 2/26/16 10:23 AM, Michael Schofield wrote:
Not thinking very critically about this, but:
I was surprised seeing that the C4L conference was looking for an IRC
communicator that, well, IRC. Why isn't there a Code4Lib Slack channel?
https://code4lib.slack.com
Cheers,
./fxk
--
Finagle's
,
Michael Schofield (@schoeyfield)
www.libux.co
www.webforlibraries.com
-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Shaun
D. Ellis
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 10:07 AM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Listserv
Nearly all of my professional communication occurs on Twitter, for better
or worse. I think that is probably the case for many of us. Code4lib is
very much alive, but perhaps has evolved into disparate conversations
taking place on Twitter instead of the listserv.
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 10:07
On Feb 26, 2016, at 8:42 AM, Julie Swierczek
> wrote:
We also agreed that listservs – both here and elsewhere – seem to have
shrinking participation over time, and there does seem to be a drive to pull
more conversations out of
I just want to respond to let people know that Kyle and I have been discussing
this further through private channels, and we agree on many points. My earlier
response was not meant to be a criticism of what Kyle said specifically;
rather, I was responding to what I see are the larger
11 matches
Mail list logo