From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Ross
Singer
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 7:22 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Unwritten Rules, formerly Pandering for votes for
code4lib sessions
I think the point of the hubbub today is tryi
> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of
Bohyun Kim
> Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 4:24 PM
> To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Unwritten Rules, formerly Pandering for votes for
code4lib sessions
>
> So this was what "panderin
--Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Bohyun
Kim
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 4:24 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Unwritten Rules, formerly Pandering for votes for
code4lib sessions
So this was what "p
hkind
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 3:48 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Unwritten Rules, formerly Pandering for votes for
code4lib sessions
I'm still not even sure why people think the blog post violated any unwritten
rules or expectations. I agree that people kind
DE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of
> Wilfred Drew
> Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 12:51 PM
> To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Unwritten Rules, formerly Pandering for votes for
> code4lib sessions
>
> If it is that important, it should be written down!
E4LIB] Unwritten Rules, formerly Pandering for votes for
code4lib sessions
On 2 December 2011 09:33, Munson, Doris wrote:
> As a relative newcomer to this list, I second the idea that any offenders be
> contacted off list with an explanation of any unwritten rules they
> unknowing
lto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Chris
> Cormack
> Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 3:36 PM
> To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Unwritten Rules, formerly Pandering for votes for
> code4lib sessions
>
> On 2 December 2011 09:33, Munson, Doris wrote:
If it is that important, it should be written down!
-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Chris
Cormack
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 3:36 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Unwritten Rules, formerly Pandering
I'm still not even sure why people think the blog post violated any
unwritten rules or expectations. I agree that people kind of
unreasonably raked the author over the coals here.
I think _maybe_ under some interpretations it's borderline (some of
those interpretations are those of the READERS
As a relative newcomer to this list, I second the idea that any offenders be
contacted off list with an explanation of any unwritten rules they unknowingly
violate. I suggest this becomes one of c4l's unwritten rules.
Regards,
Doris
Doris Munson
Systems/Reference Librarian
Eastern Washington
On 2 December 2011 09:33, Munson, Doris wrote:
> As a relative newcomer to this list, I second the idea that any offenders be
> contacted off list with an explanation of any unwritten rules they
> unknowingly violate. I suggest this becomes one of c4l's unwritten rules.
>
>
I totally just unwro
11 matches
Mail list logo
