@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: [CODE4LIB] Usability resources
Here is one Sumana mentioned:
UserTesting.com
What else is out there?
- Coral
--
--
Coral Sheldon-Hess
http://sheldon-hess.org/coral
@web_kunoichi
Yes, Andromeda is right; I meant reasonable size tests (3 users), done
often (the gold standard is monthly, as I understand it), but giving the
whole library the chance to view them in real time, remotely, then to
discuss solutions--and I was saying that isn't something I was convinced
would work
Here is one Sumana mentioned:
UserTesting.com
What else is out there?
- Coral
--
--
Coral Sheldon-Hess
http://sheldon-hess.org/coral
@web_kunoichi
OptimalWorkshop.com
-Sean
From: Code for Libraries [CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] on behalf of Coral
Sheldon-Hess [co...@sheldon-hess.org]
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 9:48 AM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: [CODE4LIB] Usability resources
Here is one
-hess.org]
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 9:48 AM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: [CODE4LIB] Usability resources
Here is one Sumana mentioned:
UserTesting.com
What else is out there?
- Coral
--
--
Coral Sheldon-Hess
http://sheldon-hess.org/coral
@web_kunoichi
On Mar 25, 2014, at 4:07 PM, Coral Sheldon-Hess wrote:
Some things that came up in the UX discussion (well, the third of it I was
in) at the breakout session, about how to get your library to be more open
to UX:
[trimmed, although, I agree on the Steve Krug books]
I apologize for the self
