2008/8/22 David Kane [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I use EPrints, which is great.
Do look out for Microsoft's offering though, which is in the pipeline. It
will be free. Of course It will need to run on a Windows server and will be
optimised for SQL Server.
Er.. it will *only* run on the most recent
Eric Lease Morgan wrote:
On Aug 21, 2008, at 4:34 PM, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
If you can figure out what the difference between an 'institutional
repository' and a 'digital library' is, let me know.
I think an institutional repository is a type of digital library.
To ma an institutional
To throw in my 2c.
Eric Lease Morgan wrote:
On Aug 21, 2008, at 4:34 PM, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
If you can figure out what the difference between an 'institutional
repository' and a 'digital library' is, let me know.
I think an institutional repository is a type of digital library.
I
Just as an aside I'd look at how you want items deposited. We use eprints
for our Master's Theses and they get cataloged. If you want faculty at a
number of locations to submit work with just a few tags you might want to
look at dspace. Another consideration is harvesting. Both of these allow
Agreed that you need a label for the function/tool/platform.
I have been in many discussions that went around and around on the word
repository. Some folks liked it because it was a reasonably generic
term for a class of tool that had some physical association with a place
where things are
Good point, Peter. Edward, it's also worth considering your
institution's overall user experience goals. Here at UVA, we want to
give users a single place to go, instead of having to search the
repository and the library catalog, so the front end for our Fedora
repository is going to be
Hi Nicole,
Thanks for the suggestion. I haven't seen this one before.
Edward
Nicole Engard wrote:
I just learned about Alfresco yesterday:
http://wiki.alfresco.com/wiki/Main_Page was this one that you decided
against - or is it new to you?
---
Nicole C. Engard
Open Source Evangelist,
On Fri, 2008-08-22 at 09:21 -0600, Binkley, Peter wrote:
Note that having said Fedora, you're only half-way there: you still need
a front end. Fez is popular, but Muradora was very well spoken of at
RIRI last week (http://vre.upei.ca/riri/), and UPEI is doing very
interesting work putting
Phil Cryer wrote:
On Fri, 2008-08-22 at 09:21 -0600, Binkley, Peter wrote:
Note that having said Fedora, you're only half-way there: you still need
a front end. Fez is popular, but Muradora was very well spoken of at
RIRI last week (http://vre.upei.ca/riri/), and UPEI is doing very
interesting
Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
If you can figure out what the difference between an 'institutional
repository' and a 'digital library' is, let me know. :)
Jonathan
Marketing. :-)
Edward
Edward M. Corrado wrote:
Hello all,
I've been investigating possible solutions for the beginnings of a
On Aug 21, 2008, at 4:34 PM, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
If you can figure out what the difference between an 'institutional
repository' and a 'digital library' is, let me know.
I think an institutional repository is a type of digital library.
In general, an institutional repository is
I have grown to really dislike the phrase digital library.
In my last job most folks referred to The DL when they meant the
digital collection repository (NOT an IR, but a repo for digitized
library collections). Some of us kept making the point that digital
library meant not just digitized
I agreewholeheartedly with there is no digital library, it's just the
library. And just the library increasingly has not only it's
collections but it's services digital and online (is digital reference
part of the 'digital library'? can you have a 'digital library' without
online reference?
I use EPrints, which is great.
Do look out for Microsoft's offering though, which is in the pipeline. It
will be free. Of course It will need to run on a Windows server and will be
optimised for SQL Server.
David.
--
David Kane
Systems Librarian
Waterford Institute of Technology
14 matches
Mail list logo
