Re: [CODE4LIB] Stack Overflow

2014-11-04 Thread Joshua Welker
The concept of a library technology Stack Exchange site as a google-able repository of information sounds great. However, I do have quite a few reservations. 1. Stack Exchange sites seem to naturally lead to gatekeeping, snobbishness, and other troll behaviors. The reputation system built into

Re: [CODE4LIB] Stack Overflow

2014-11-04 Thread Joe Hourcle
On Nov 4, 2014, at 9:12 AM, Schulkins, Joe wrote: Presumably I'm not alone in this, but I find Stack Overflow a valuable resource for various bits of web development and I was wondering whether anyone has given any thought about proposing a Library Technology site to Stack Exchange's Area

Re: [CODE4LIB] Stack Overflow

2014-11-04 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 9:12 AM, Schulkins, Joe joseph.schulk...@liverpool.ac.uk wrote: Presumably I'm not alone in this, but I find Stack Overflow a valuable resource for various bits of web development and I was wondering whether anyone has given any thought about proposing a Library

Re: [CODE4LIB] Stack Overflow

2014-11-04 Thread raffaele messuti
Schulkins, Joe wrote: Doing a search of the proposals shows there was one for 'Libraries and Information Science' but this closed 2 years ago as it didn't reach the required levels during the beta phase. FIY an archive of question answered on Libraries Information Science and Digital

Re: [CODE4LIB] Stack Overflow

2014-11-04 Thread Schulkins, Joe
: 04 November 2014 14:43 To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Stack Overflow The concept of a library technology Stack Exchange site as a google-able repository of information sounds great. However, I do have quite a few reservations. 1. Stack Exchange sites seem to naturally lead

Re: [CODE4LIB] Stack Overflow

2014-11-04 Thread Joshua Welker
: Tuesday, November 04, 2014 8:54 AM To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Stack Overflow On Nov 4, 2014, at 9:12 AM, Schulkins, Joe wrote: Presumably I'm not alone in this, but I find Stack Overflow a valuable resource for various bits of web development and I was wondering whether

Re: [CODE4LIB] Stack Overflow

2014-11-04 Thread Owen Stephens
Archives blog: http://manuscriptsandmore.liv.ac.uk -Original Message- From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Joshua Welker Sent: 04 November 2014 14:43 To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Stack Overflow The concept

Re: [CODE4LIB] Stack Overflow

2014-11-04 Thread Mark A. Matienzo
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Owen Stephens o...@ostephens.com wrote: Another option would be a 'code4lib QA' site. Becky Yoose set up one for Coding/Cataloguing and so can comment on how much effort its been. In terms of asking/answering questions the use is clearly low but I think the

Re: [CODE4LIB] Stack Overflow

2014-11-04 Thread Jason Stirnaman
Of Joshua Welker Sent: 04 November 2014 14:43 To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Stack Overflow The concept of a library technology Stack Exchange site as a google-able repository of information sounds great. However, I do have quite a few reservations. 1. Stack Exchange

Re: [CODE4LIB] Stack Overflow

2014-11-04 Thread Kyle Banerjee
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 7:34 AM, Schulkins, Joe joseph.schulk...@liverpool.ac.uk wrote: To be honest I absolutely hate the whole reputation and badge system for exactly the reasons you outline, but I can't deny that I do find the family of Stack Exchange sites extremely useful and by

Re: [CODE4LIB] Stack Overflow

2014-11-04 Thread Becky Yoose
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Owen Stephens o...@ostephens.com wrote: Another option would be a 'code4lib QA' site. Becky Yoose set up one for Coding/Cataloguing and so can comment on how much effort its been. For the sake of laziness, I'll point to my post from the last time a SE topic

Re: [CODE4LIB] Stack Overflow

2014-11-04 Thread Joshua Welker
for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Kyle Banerjee Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2014 10:18 AM To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Stack Overflow On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 7:34 AM, Schulkins, Joe joseph.schulk...@liverpool.ac.uk wrote: To be honest I absolutely hate

Re: [CODE4LIB] Stack Overflow

2014-11-04 Thread Joseph Montibello
++ Joe Montibello, MLIS Library Systems Manager Dartmouth College 603.646.9394 joseph.montibe...@dartmouth.edu On Nov 4, 2014, at 11:18 AM, Kyle Banerjee kyle.baner...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 7:34 AM, Schulkins, Joe joseph.schulk...@liverpool.ac.uk wrote: To be honest

Re: [CODE4LIB] Stack Overflow

2014-11-04 Thread Owen Stephens
Thanks for that Mark. That's running on 'question2answer' which looks to have a reasonable amount of development going on around it https://github.com/q2a/question2answer/graphs/contributors (given Becky's comments about OSQA which still hold true) Owen Owen Stephens Owen Stephens Consulting

Re: [CODE4LIB] Stack Overflow

2014-11-04 Thread Craig Boman
I agree with Joshua Welker. Being able to choose between either a listserv or a QA site have benefits for end users. Thanks, Craig On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 11:47 AM, Owen Stephens o...@ostephens.com wrote: Thanks for that Mark. That's running on 'question2answer' which looks to have a

Re: [CODE4LIB] Stack Overflow

2014-11-04 Thread Mark Pernotto
I think all of this is really useful. I'd be lying if I said I didn't get a lot of great ideas and results from StackOverflow. However, I've been burned quite a bit as well - deprecated code, inaccurate results, or just the wrong answer gets accepted. There seems to be such a push to 'accept as

Re: [CODE4LIB] Stack Overflow

2014-11-04 Thread Joe Hourcle
On Nov 4, 2014, at 1:33 PM, Mark Pernotto wrote: I think all of this is really useful. I'd be lying if I said I didn't get a lot of great ideas and results from StackOverflow. However, I've been burned quite a bit as well - deprecated code, inaccurate results, or just the wrong answer gets

Re: [CODE4LIB] Stack Overflow

2014-11-04 Thread Andrew Anderson
On Nov 4, 2014, at 9:42, Joshua Welker wel...@ucmo.edu wrote: 3. Libraries have a culture of protecting vendors from criticism. Sure, we do lots of criticism behind closed doors, but nowhere that leaves an online footprint. Oops. Someone should have told me that rule before I openly and