Re: [CODE4LIB] code4lib journal

2006-05-03 Thread Kevin S. Clarke
The fact that /lib/dev has punctuation is something that was discussed in #code4lib. All I can say, as Roy pointed out, is the people voted for what they wanted. Fwiw, unlike C++ (which is a pain to search for), /lib/dev without the punctuation leaves a searchable string "libdev" (that's why we

Re: [CODE4LIB] code4lib journal

2006-05-03 Thread Edward Summers
On May 3, 2006, at 9:51 PM, Daniel Chudnov wrote: /lib/dev: It'll take your breath away! I like that better than: /lib/dev: idiot breath But I'm the one who suggested Infinite Monkey Journal So take that with a breath mint sized chunk of salt. //Ed

Re: [CODE4LIB] code4lib journal

2006-05-03 Thread Godmar Back
;login: The USENIX Magazine http://www.usenix.org/publications/login/ On 5/3/06, Eric Hellman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Here's the latest on the code4lib journal: > >"/lib/dev: A Journal for Library Programmers" won the journal name >vote. (See http://www.code4lib.org/node/96 for more details

Re: [CODE4LIB] code4lib journal

2006-05-03 Thread Daniel Chudnov
On May 3, 2006, at 10:27 PM, Eric Hellman wrote: Here's the latest on the code4lib journal: "/lib/dev: A Journal for Library Programmers" won the journal name vote. (See http://www.code4lib.org/node/96 for more details.) The idea of a journal name that contains punctuation in the title is so

Re: [CODE4LIB] code4lib journal

2006-05-03 Thread Roy Tennant
Eric, Surely you must realize it was a vote. Once it was put to a vote, under specific rules, if the rules are followed (and they were as far as I know), then we're stuck with it, for good or evil. Unfortunately, I think poor Jeff Davis was quite against that choice. Roy On May 3, 2006, at 7:27 P

Re: [CODE4LIB] code4lib journal

2006-05-03 Thread Eric Hellman
Here's the latest on the code4lib journal: "/lib/dev: A Journal for Library Programmers" won the journal name vote. (See http://www.code4lib.org/node/96 for more details.) The idea of a journal name that contains punctuation in the title is so breathtakingly idiotic that I can only assume that

Re: [CODE4LIB] code4lib journal

2006-05-03 Thread Davis, Jeffrey
Brief clarification: The OJS people are also interested in contributions to the project beyond the level of plugins. So if it's not possible to add a feature as a plugin, but it's something you think a lot of other OJS users would find useful (and it wouldn't be too obtrusive for existing OJS

Re: [CODE4LIB] code4lib journal

2006-05-03 Thread Davis, Jeffrey
Here's the latest on the code4lib journal: "/lib/dev: A Journal for Library Programmers" won the journal name vote. (See http://www.code4lib.org/node/96 for more details.) I've been talking to Simon Fraser University about hosting the journal and looking into using Open Journal Systems to host