Sorry for the confusion, folks. I posted a preliminary link for
testing the new voting and proposal system.
http://dilettantes.code4lib.org:8080/election/index/2
That's the -real- ballot, and it opens at midnight tonight (Eastern
time) and will be open for 24 hours.
So, uh, thanks to everybody
There was some minor miscommunication with the voting system and the initial
link sent out was to a test instance of the voting system.
Please use the following URL for voting on the talks for the conference talks -
the voting will be officially open as of December 11th:
http://dilettantes.code
Hi all,
The following was sent out to the code4libcon list earlier today:
- Forwarded message from Ross Singer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Correction:
The actual URL is:
http://dilettantes.code4lib.org:8080/election/index/2
and the polls open at midnight tonight (although if there's
overwhel
Same here.
James Jacobs wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm logged in but receive the following message:
This election is currently closed. Voting times are between:
Tue Dec 11 00:00:00 EST 2007 and Tue Dec 11 23:59:00 EST 2007
Anyone else seeing that?
James Jacobs
Andrew Nagy wrote:
It might be also wor
Hi folks,
I'm logged in but receive the following message:
This election is currently closed. Voting times are between:
Tue Dec 11 00:00:00 EST 2007 and Tue Dec 11 23:59:00 EST 2007
Anyone else seeing that?
James Jacobs
Andrew Nagy wrote:
It might be also worthy to note that based on the cur
Oy. I see now that the corrected url for the vote was posted with a
different subject heading. Sometimes threaded emails are not your
friend (bad Gmail, no cookie).
http://dilettantes.code4lib.org:8080/election/index/2
Tom
On 12/10/07, Tom Keays <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there some reason
Is there some reason that the poll was open for a total of 5 hours?
I.E., between
Mon Dec 10 11:50:00 EST 2007 and Mon Dec 10 15:50:00 EST 2007
Hoping that was an error.
Tom
On 12/10/07, Michael J. Giarlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://dilettantes.code4lib.org:8080/election/index/1
It might be also worthy to note that based on the current draft schedule there
are roughly 17 spot for talks. This might have an effect on voting. Is the 17
spots set in stone or will that change based on the outcome?
Andrew
> -Original Message-
> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[EMA
On Dec 10, 2007 1:14 PM, Ranti Junus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This is my first time. When the instruction said "choose the score
> you wish to assign from 0-3", does "0" mean "do not want" and "3" mean
> "defintely want"? Just want to be sure.
>
Thanks for asking, Ranti; we did not make th
On Dec 10, 2007 12:47 PM, Michael J. Giarlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> May the voting begin!
This is my first time. When the instruction said "choose the score
you wish to assign from 0-3", does "0" mean "do not want" and "3" mean
"defintely want"? Just want to be sure.
thanks,
ranti
The time has come, the walrus said, to vote on many things. We
received approximately -fifty- proposals this year -- outstanding!
Now it's time for the community to vote on the proposals. You will
have to login with your Drupal credentials from code4lib.org -- if you
never signed up for an accou
Many thanks Keith, putting control points on the intersections is a
great idea. I'll give that a try.
Clay
On Dec 7, 2007, at 11:25 AM, Keith Jenkins wrote:
Hi, Clay.
Your details are daunting, but I'll try to help :)
Since your map is lucky enough to have them, I'd suggest using the
inter
12 matches
Mail list logo
