Sorry for the confusion over SRU, and I'm afraid this takes up way
off-topic, but since you asked .
I meant the SRU *response format*. And even that doesn't make sense, not in
the context of the current SRU spec. But in the next version, 2.0, which we
are now developing within OASIS, the
> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of
> Jonathan Rochkind
> Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 12:02 PM
> To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] MIME Type for MARC, Mods, etc.?
>
> I'm confused about your suggestion of registering a content type for
Thanks Ray. marcxml+xml makes sense to me, the name is really arbitrary,
so long as we have _something_ that represents MARC-XML. Glad you are
working on this.
I'm confused about your suggestion of registering a content type for
SRU. My understanding is that SRU is a _protocol_, not a media
> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of
> Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress
> Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 5:48 PM
> To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] MIME Type for MARC, Mods, etc.?
>
> A few points:
>
> 1. "x-" is commonly used in cas
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 7:25 AM, Alexander Johannesen
wrote:
> I wasn't asking for technical reasons; I was more having a stab at how
> many people use and need MARCXML specifically as compared to a number
> of other more used formats. I mean, seriously, you can use MARCXML
> embedded in Atom and
[Apologies for cross-posting]
Registration for the European Library Automation Group (ELAG) 2009 conference
is now open at http://indico.ulib.sk/elag2009. The conference takes place 22-24
April in Bratislava, Slovakia.
The ELAG Conference is Europe's premier conference for library and informati
>> One question we haven't asked is if we really need a MIME type for
>> MARCXML. :)
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 23:28, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
> PPS: Yes, it has been asked, and it's pretty obvious to me that we do.
I wasn't asking for technical reasons; I was more having a stab at how
many people
