Thanks Tom and Dana!
Dana, I bow to your superior Google searching skills. :-)
--Dave
==
David Walker
Library Web Services Manager
California State University
http://xerxes.calstate.edu
From: Code for Libraries [code4...@listserv.nd.edu] O
Look here:
http://imlsdcc.grainger.uiuc.edu/docs/stylesheets/GeneralMARCtoQDC.xsl
Kind regards,
Tom
--
Thomas G. Habing
Research Programmer
Grainger Engineering Library Information Center
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Walker, David wrote:
Hi All,
Anyone have an XSLT styl
try:
http://imlsdcc.grainger.uiuc.edu/docs/stylesheets/GeneralMARCtoQDC.xsl
I searched the file title (not complete path) in Google.
regards,
Dana Pearson
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Walker, David wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Anyone have an XSLT style sheet to convert from MARC-XML to Qualified
Hey David - per my last posting in regards to MARCXML XSLTs - the LOC
maintains a large collection of XSLT for MARCXML that are very thorough
http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/xslt/
Andrew
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Walker, David wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Anyone have an XSLT style sheet to
Hi All,
Anyone have an XSLT style sheet to convert from MARC-XML to Qualified Dublin
Core?
I'm looking to load these into DSpace, if that makes a difference. Looks like
LOC only has MARC-XML to Simple Dublin Core. This page [1] mentions a
'MARCXML to Qualified DC styles heets' developed a
If you do choose to use XSLT, the Library of Congress has a bunch of XSLTs
for MARCXML which will save a tremendous amount of time for you.
http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/xslt/
Andrew
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Jared Camins wrote:
> Dear CODE4LIB,
>
> I think this sort of question w
Dear CODE4LIB,
I think this sort of question would fall under the purview of this list, but
if there's a better forum for my question, please let me know. I am
cataloging a special collection in MARC (to take advantage of LC copy
cataloging, primarily), but at the end of the project I will be prod
On 3/5/09 7:52 PM, "Eric Morgan" wrote:
> As a community, let's establish the Code4Lib Open Source Software Award...
Thank you for the feedback, and please keep it coming. I am saving the
comments for future reference so I don't miss anything.
--
Eric Lease Morgan
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
> And if the Oscars are our model, color me even more concerned. :)
>
But think of the Freebase mashup opportunities
-Ross.
Mike Taylor wrote:
The Motion Picture Academy doesn't collectively know enough about what
makes good movies to give a Best Picture Oscar reliably, either, but
that doesn't stop them taking their best guess.
And if the Oscars are our model, color me even more concerned. :)
But the _effect_ o
Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
"It might be a good idea, but maybe not with the Code4Lib name. But I worry
in general we don?t collectively know enough about what makes good software
to give a Software of the Year honor reliably."
Karen Schneider wrote:
"On the one hand, I agree. On the other hand, just
Code4Lib 2009 -- February 25, 2009
Draft notes: Breakout Session: Evaluating Open Source
Input welcome from attendees and anyone else.
This breakout session started from an informal discussion at a C4L
wine and cheese. The group brainstormed questions about questions to
ask for
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Mike Taylor wrote:
>
>
> > It might be a good idea, but maybe not with the Code4Lib name. But
> > I worry in general we don't collectively know enough about what
> > makes good software to give a Software of the Year honor reliably.
>
> The Motion Picture Acade
Jonathan Rochkind writes:
> I worry about putting the name Code4Lib on it, and implying that
> somehow Code4Lib collectively approves the awardee. Code4Lib can't
> do much of anything collectively. But the name seems to have
> acquired a cachet among people who may not understand what it
> is
Karen, you should post your notes from that break-out somewhere. Take
your choice of on the listserv, on www.code4lib.org, on
wiki.code4lib.org, on your own blog, wherever you think is appropriate. :)
I think it's good that as a community we're starting to discuss these
issues more, and learn
"It might be a good idea, but maybe not with the Code4Lib name. But I worry
in general we don’t collectively know enough about what makes good software
to give a Software of the Year honor reliably."
On the one hand, I agree. On the other hand, just to note, there was a
breakout session at C4L whe
I worry about putting the name Code4Lib on it, and implying that somehow
Code4Lib collectively approves the awardee. Code4Lib can’t do much of
anything collectively. But the name seems to have acquired a cachet
among people who may not understand what it is. People within Code4Lib
will have dif
I also think this is a good idea. I'd like to comment on the straw
man:
> * Regarding who is eligible, I suggest it be
> individuals, teams, or corporate entities.
> Awardees must be willing to serve on the
> next year's nominating committee.
"Awardees" should be changed to "nominee
I think this is a good idea. However, I wonder if the number of
contributions from those other than the sponsoring institution or original
developer might also be considered when evaluating open source software?
Contributions come in many forms -- code, design, testing, and documentation
to name a
19 matches
Mail list logo
