[CODE4LIB] Thanks for taking the survey

2009-08-11 Thread Edward Iglesias
Thanks to all 204 of you who took my Systems Librarian Survey. Results are at http://library.ccsu.edu/staffblog/?p=147 The full results and analysis will be part of an upcoming book from Chandos publishing tentatively called Systemic Shifts: The Changing Role of the Systems Librarian. Edward

Re: [CODE4LIB] [Fwd: [ol-tech] Modified RDF/XML api]

2009-08-11 Thread Aaron Rubinstein
Hello Karen, Thanks so much for your detailed response. Karen Coyle wrote: The OL group has talked about linking to id.loc.gov, but in fact the project folks are mainly interested in getting away from the LCSH structuring of subjects. I admit that I find it hard to defend LCSH in the

Re: [CODE4LIB] [Fwd: [ol-tech] Modified RDF/XML api]

2009-08-11 Thread Ed Summers
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:40 AM, Karen Coyleli...@kcoyle.net wrote: Ed, I have NO IDEA how you got to rdf/xml from the OL author link -- do tell, and I'll take a look! There is no RDF/XML export template for authors, but one could be created. The URI/URL is simply the address of the author

Re: [CODE4LIB] [Fwd: [ol-tech] Modified RDF/XML api]

2009-08-11 Thread Corey Harper
Hi Karen, Simply adding .rdf to the end of that link returns the RDF/XML Ed mentioned, though invalid due to the namespace issue. Additionally, it looks to me like content negotiation is functioning properly against the author URIs as well as the bibs, which is fantastic. I'd agree with

Re: [CODE4LIB] [Fwd: [ol-tech] Modified RDF/XML api]

2009-08-11 Thread Coombs, Karen A
Karen, I hate to say it but as someone who is working with the WorldCat Search API at this point I sure could create code that used Open Library data faster if you used one of the same metadata formats that the WorldCat Search API uses. While the two services seem different, (I haven't really

Re: [CODE4LIB] [Fwd: [ol-tech] Modified RDF/XML api]

2009-08-11 Thread Ed Summers
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Coombs, Karen Akacoo...@central.uh.edu wrote: I hate to say it but as someone who is working with the WorldCat Search API at this point I sure could create code that used Open Library data faster if you used one of the same metadata formats that the WorldCat

[CODE4LIB] Job Posting: Applications Programmer-Analyst Intermediate/Librarian (University of Michigan Library)

2009-08-11 Thread Weise, John
http://www.umich.edu/~jobs/ Job ID: 32963 Applications Programmer-Analyst Intermediate/Librarian Digital Library Production Service (DLPS) University of Michigan Library FLSA: Exempt Hours: 40 hours/week Target Salary Range: $50,000-$75,000 annually, dependent on qualifications and previous

Re: [CODE4LIB] [Fwd: [ol-tech] Modified RDF/XML api]

2009-08-11 Thread Karen Coyle
Karen, I assume that MARCXML is one of those formats? As for MODS, that's possible although at the moment names would not be broken down. OL is working on altering its storage of names to include separate given and family portions, so that will be possible in the future. Note that an

Re: [CODE4LIB] [Fwd: [ol-tech] Modified RDF/XML api]

2009-08-11 Thread Karen Coyle
OK! thanks. There must be some default operating there... RDF for authors is now on to do list! Here are the data elements available: name alternate names website birth date death date wikipedia link FOAF doesn't cover death dates... RDA has death dates, alternate names. Should FOAF be used

Re: [CODE4LIB] [Fwd: [ol-tech] Modified RDF/XML api]

2009-08-11 Thread Ross Singer
Karen, The Bio vocabulary might help with the birth/death dates: http://vocab.org/bio/0.1/.html And foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/#term_isPrimaryTopicOf might be a good way to relate to the wikipedia page. I don't have any recommendation for alternate names (and would be

Re: [CODE4LIB] [Fwd: [ol-tech] Modified RDF/XML api]

2009-08-11 Thread Karen Coombs
Yes, the WorldCat Search API offers MARCXML. It is a bear to work with, which is why MODS seems like a slightly better route. Smarter than DC but not has beastly as MARCXML. I actually don't anything from the MARC fixed fields right now. So the fact that that information is missing isn't a