> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of
> Bill Dueber
> Sent: Saturday, March 06, 2010 05:11 PM
> To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Q: XML2JSON converter
>
> Anyway, hopefully, it won't be a huge surprise that I don't disagree
> with any of th
I think maybe I started the chatter in IRC, but now it looks as if I
should redefine my region. Being in KC, I don't see myself or other MO,
KS driving to Ohio and back in a day or weekend. I could be wrong.
Thoughts? Any interest in a Code4Lib-Big-12-ish?
Kudos to Jonathan for running with this.
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Houghton,Andrew wrote:
> A way to fix this issue is to say that use cases #1 and #2 conform to
> media type application/json and use case #3 conforms to a new media type
> say: application/marc+json. This new application/marc+json media type now
> becomes a libra
> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of
> Bill Dueber
> Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 08:48 PM
> To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Q: XML2JSON converter
>
> On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Houghton,Andrew
> wrote:
>
> > OK, I will bite, you s
