Apologies for cross posting if you receive this more than once.
If you have not already registered for this popular event, there are only a few
places remaining to join representatives from several National Libraries and
others interested in the potential for, and application of, Linked data at
In my experience, you can't tell much about what you'd really want to
know for user needs from the indicators or subfield 3's, at least in my
catalog.
FRBR relationships probably don't work because the destination of an
arbitrary 856 is not neccesarily a FRBR entity, and even if it is
http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/#terms-relation
This term is intended to be used with non-literal values as defined
in the DCMI Abstract Model
(http://dublincore.org/documents/abstract-model/). As of December
2007, the DCMI Usage Board is seeking a way to express this intention
with a
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu wrote:
So dc:relation does sound like the right vocabulary element for generic
related web page page, thanks. Is the value of dc:relation _neccesarily_
a URI/URL? I hope so, because otherwise I'm not sure dc:relation is
d'oh, s/dcterms:related/dcterms:relation/ (thanks ksclarke). I also
meant to point out that rdfs:seeAlso is another option.
//Ed
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Ed Summers e...@pobox.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu wrote:
So dc:relation does sound
rdfs:seeAlso++
On Jul 8, 2010 6:01 PM, Ed Summers e...@pobox.com wrote:
d'oh, s/dcterms:related/dcterms:relation/ (thanks ksclarke). I also
meant to point out that rdfs:seeAlso is another option.
//Ed
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Ed Summers e...@pobox.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at
Here's a final reminder about the call for proposal deadline for the edUi
Conference. We're specifically looking for proposals from library and
museum folks. The deadline is July 16th.
edUi 2010 will be in Charlottesville, VA Nov. 8-9.
-Trey
-- Forwarded message --
From: Trey
Quoting Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu:
So dc:relation does sound like the right vocabulary element for
generic related web page page, thanks. Is the value of dc:relation
_neccesarily_ a URI/URL? I hope so, because otherwise I'm not sure
dc:relation is sufficient, as I really do need
