Thom Hickey posted a blog entry about our plans to streamline the VIAF
RDF.
http://outgoing.typepad.com/outgoing/2011/04/changes-to-viafs-rdf.html
I can elaborate on the listserv if anyone wants to discuss the changes.
Jeff
---
Jeffrey A. Young
Software Architect
OCLC Research,
This is too funny! Devon and I just got unsubscribed today! Probably
because our mail server rejected Jeff's messages to the list.
Ralph
From: LeVan,Ralph
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 3:32 PM
To: Code for Libraries
Subject: Listserv help desperately needed!
When an OCLC staff member
On Apr 12, 2011, at 10:36 AM, LeVan,Ralph wrote:
This is too funny! Devon and I just got unsubscribed today! Probably
because our mail server rejected Jeff's messages to the list.
And too weird. I will take a closer look at these things. I promise.
--
Eric Mailing List Owner Morgan
-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf
Of
Eric Lease Morgan
This is too funny! Devon and I just got unsubscribed today!
Probably
because our mail server rejected Jeff's messages to the list.
And too weird. I will take a closer
-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf
Of
Peter Murray
For what it is worth, my employer is using Postini, and Code4Lib
messages
seem to be a disproportionate number of the ones caught in the
held-for-
content filter. Perhaps that
-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf
Of
Danielle Plumer
It's not an elegant solution, but I have a duplicate subscription
using
my Google account, for much the same reason.
I disagree! It is an elegant solution! If I can't get
-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf
Of
Colford, Scot
You should just be able to ask your mail admin to whitelist list
messages from
the nd.edu mailserver, oughtn't you?
We get messages from the list just fine, as long as they
I have seen this at one of our schools. In our case it was because
their spam filter sees the from address of whoe...@theirschool.edu, and
does not recognize our mail server as a valid sender for their domain.
We modified the from address to not be from their domain, and it now
happily accepts
The Brown University Library seeks an energetic and innovative individual
for the newly created position of Digital Repository Manager. The Digital
Repository Manager will oversee the development of the Brown Digital
Repository (BDR), a Fedora Commons-based initiative that is a locus for
digital
Update:
Somebody offline asked why the diagrams have links to external Swiss and German
authority resources, but not LC. The reason is that LC doesn't currently
publish their name authority file as linked data. When they do, the owl:sameAs
links to their URIs can be added to VIAF.
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Young,Jeff (OR) jyo...@oclc.org wrote:
The only VIAF contributors we're aware of today that publish their own
authority Linked Data are Deutsche Nationalbibliothek, National Library of
Sweden, and the National Széchényi Library (Hungary).
Let's hope the trend
I like that you said when rather than if, heh.
Have you guys at VIAF made it clear to LC that you'd consider them publishing
in linked data to be a complement to VIAF, rather than duplication? I think
maybe some people think it'd be duplication, which I think is not true.
-Original
It would make perfect sense for LC to publish the LCNAF in their id.loc.gov
domain. I think the foaf:focus pattern is important for name authorities,
though, and would encourage them to coin two URIs instead of just one. For
example:
http://id.loc.gov/authorities/n50042127#concept a
Thought this might be of possible interest to code4lib!
Amy Donahue, MLIS, AHIP
Aurora Medical Center Grafton
975 Port Washington Road, Grafton, WI 53024
Medical Librarian/Informationist
phone: 262.329.1025
fax: 262.329.1021
amy.dona...@aurora.org
- Forwarded by Amy Donahue/GRF/AHC on
Good Afternoon-
We have 2 web developer positions open at Duke. I posted one a couple weeks
ago but wanted to do so again as it had not yet posted to the University's site
(they are both there now). I've included the descriptions (most recent first)
below.
Thank you,
-debra
Web and
The challenge I like to present to libraries is this: imagine that your entire
collection is digital. Does it include Shakespeare? Does it include Moby Dick?
Yes! Just because you don't have to pay for these works, doesn't mean that they
don't belong in your library. And what if many modern
16 matches
Mail list logo
