The training data is not currently under source control (it's in the
database), but the trained model is.
That's, admittedly, a bit of a downside to my fork (although the model being
checked into git is true of the original, as well) since you'd always be in
conflict with my trained model if you
Dear Fellow Dataists,
We have gotten some great feedback on tools used for messing with metadata.
Included in some of the comments is either explicitly or implied “use
cases”.
For those who have *some good “stories” about what they want to do with the
data* – can you share that? Want a tool
If someone else were getting started and didn't want to assemble their
own training data -- do you think it would be likely useful for them to
aggregate your training data _and_ Brown's training data together and
generate a new model? Was there a particular reason you chose not to
use Brown's
Anjanette,
Do you have an approximate dollar amount as to the cost of registration? We
government types need to start getting our paperwork in order sooner rather
than later. ;)
Thanks!
--Joel
Joel Richard
IT Specialist, Web Services Department
Smithsonian Institution Libraries |
Equinox Software, a growing and dynamic open source software development
and support company based in Norcross, Georgia, is seeking a talented
and dedicated Systems Administrator. Systems Administrators are
responsible for the overall health and maintenance of customer-facing
and internal
Thanks everybody!
this is useful for a couple of purposes
1) sometimes we have records that have call numbers, but no subject headings.
this would be useful to provide those.
2) i'm thinking of providing a 'subject heading' label to our shelf browser --
so users see, in addition to the callnumber
For #1, you need what you asked for, probably, if you want the subject
headings to be consistent with other LCSH on the rest of your records.
For #2, you can provide a useful topical/subject type heading via much
simpler and more feasible solutions than mapping to LCSH. For #2, you
don't
Registration will probably be $150.
--Anjanette
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 8:04 AM, Richard, Joel M richar...@si.edu wrote:
Anjanette,
Do you have an approximate dollar amount as to the cost of registration? We
government types need to start getting our paperwork in order sooner rather
than
Quoting Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu:
For #2, you can provide a useful topical/subject type heading via
much simpler and more feasible solutions than mapping to LCSH. For
#2, you don't need a map to LCSH, you need the LCC schedules with
descriptions of what each range of LCC call
Ah, but we're not talking about entry vocabulary, we're talking about
labelling shelf ranges.
But I agree that the headings for LCC will be less user friendly than
LCSH. If there was a way to get LCC-to-LCSH mappings in an easily
usable way without paying tens of thousands of dollars, that
Hi, everyone.
Here is another opportunity to join the Stanford digital library team. As
always, we pay well, we're great colleagues, and we build great software.
Please also feel free to pass this listing along to anyone you know who might
be interested. I will be at the Access conference in
11 matches
Mail list logo
