On 10 December 2011 13:14, Karen Coyle li...@kcoyle.net wrote:
I don't believe that anyone is saying that we have a goal of having a
re-serialization of ISO 2709 in RDF so that we can begin to use that as our
data format. We *do* have millions of records in 2709 with cataloging based
on AACR
Quoting Richard Wallis richard.wal...@talis.com:
I agree with your sentiment here but, from what you imply at
http://futurelib.pbworks.com/w/page/29114548/MARC%20elements,
transformation in to something that would be recognisable by the
originators of the source Marc will be difficult - and
Quoting Simon Spero s...@unc.edu:
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Richard Wallis
richard.wal...@talis.comwrote:
*A record is a silo within a silo*
* *
A record within a catalogue duplicates the
publisher/author/subject/etc.information stored in adjacent records
describing items by the
This is more for creating books than uploading existing ones, but maybe
that would work for you.
http://pressbooks.com/
On 2:59 PM, Lars Aronsson wrote:
To be clear: I need a platform where regular users, logged
in or not, can upload new books through a web interface.
Does that leave me with
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Karen Coyle li...@kcoyle.net wrote:
Quoting Simon Spero s...@unc.edu:
From a logical point of view, a bibliographic record can seen as a theory
-that is to say a consistent set of statements. There may be
records describing the same thing, but the theories
On 12/11/2011 08:52 PM, Simon Spero wrote:
The point I was trying to make is not related to any kind of display- it is
about how the meanings of the statements derived from a record are only
The reality that library catalog records try to record is the physical
book, and in particular its
Nope, I really meant that some unlocked devices will work fine on T-Mobile's
voice network but T-Mobile is blocking the data service on them. I have one
such device, the Huawei S7, a 7 Android phone/tablet. When it first came out a
little over a year ago people were using it on T-Mobile's data
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Lars Aronsson l...@aronsson.se wrote:
On 12/11/2011 08:52 PM, Simon Spero wrote:
The point I was trying to make is not related to any kind of display- it
is about how the meanings of the statements derived from a record are only
The reality that library
Quoting Simon Spero s...@unc.edu:
These issues are orthogonal to the point I'm trying to make, which is that
records are collections of related assertions, and that the
interrelationship between these assertions is a necessary part of their
meaning.
Simon
Simon, I agree that there are
Karen,
On 11 December 2011 15:18, Karen Coyle li...@kcoyle.net wrote:
Quoting Richard Wallis richard.wal...@talis.com:
I agree with your sentiment here but, from what you imply at
Quoting Richard Wallis richard.wal...@talis.com:
You get the impression that the BL chose a subset of their current
bibliographic data to expose as LD - it was kind of the other way around.
Having modeled the 'things' in the British National Bibliography domain
(plus those in related domain
11 matches
Mail list logo
