On Dec 12, 2011, at 6:35 PM, Michael B. Klein wrote:
> I've altered my previous function (https://gist.github.com/1468557) into
> something that's pretty much a straight letter-substitution cipher.
This is what I ended up using
https://github.com/tingletech/greeker.py/blob/3ba1e84bc1ea51fa501c1a4
> -Original Message-
> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of
> Richard Wallis
> Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2011 3:16 PM
> To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Namespace management, was Models of MARC in RDF
>
> On 13 December 2011 22:17
On 13 December 2011 22:17, Peter Noerr wrote:
> I agree with Karen below that a record seems more bounded and static,
> whereas a description varies according to need. And that is the distinction
> I was trying to get at: that the item stored in some database is everything
> unique about that ent
Simon,
You wrote:
> Q: In your definition, can *descriptions *be put* * into 1:1 correspondence
> with records (where a record is a atomic asserted set of propositions about
> a resource)?
>
I do not believe so, especially when referencing back to where we started -
the Marc Record.
A Marc reco
Being no longer in Europe, I had completely missed the currently hot potato
definition of EMU. But it had a nice feel to it
I agree with Karen below that a record seems more bounded and static, whereas a
description varies according to need. And that is the distinction I was trying
to get at:
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Karen Coyle wrote:
> Yes, I realize that you were asking Richard, but I'm a bit forward, as we
> know. I do NOT see a description as atomic in the sense that a record is
> atomic. A record has rigid walls, a description has permeable ones. A
> description always
Salvete!
Just an alert that the next non OCLC sanctioned, deeply underground, seedy
meeting of the MDC Chapter of Code4Lib will be gathering
Tuesday, 10 January, 2012 10:00AM to Noon at The George Washington University
Gelman Library in Foggy Bottom, DC 2130 H Street NW Washington DC 2005
Quoting Simon Spero :
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Richard Wallis
wrote:
However, I think you are thinking in the right direction - I am
resigning myself to just using the word 'description'.
Q: In your definition, can *descriptions *be put* * into 1:1 correspondence
with records (wh
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Richard Wallis wrote:
> However, I think you are thinking in the right direction - I am
> resigning myself to just using the word 'description'.
Q: In your definition, can *descriptions *be put* * into 1:1 correspondence
with records (where a record is a atomic
**Apologies for cross-posting**
Call for 'Virtual' Participation: LITA Mobile Computing IG meeting
for ALA Midwinter 2012
Online, Wednesday, Jan. 11, 2012 at noon EST
The LITA Mobile Computing IG seeks 4-5 short presentations (10-15
minutes) on mobile computing for the upcoming 2012 ALA Midwinter
Call for Pre-Conference Bootcamp proposals:
ELAG 2012 Pre-Conference Bootcamps - 15 May, 2012, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
Are you a library hacker who has found new ways to leverage library data to
build 21st century services?
Are you a systems implementer boosting productivity by rapidly building
Call for presentation proposals
ELAG 2012 Conference presentations 16-18 May 2012, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
Are your proud of the work you have been doing ?
Do you think you know stuff you should share ?
Do you have a great idea ? Are you able to teach your colleagues something ?
Make yourself hear
Call for workshop proposals
ELAG 2012 Workshops 16-18 May 2012, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
Would you like to lead a stimulating discussion with a group of library
technologists?
Do you prefer encouraging audience participation rather giving a formal lecture?
Do you have a specific area of expertise
Peter,
On 12 December 2011 22:11, Peter Noerr wrote:
> Trying to synthesize what Karen, Richard and Simon have bombarded us with
> here, leads me to conclude that linking to existing (or to be created)
> external data (ontologies and representations) is a matter of: being sure
> what you’re the
14 matches
Mail list logo
