use, Google would object for large scale batch
uses.
- Godmar
[1] Annette Bailey and Godmar Back, Retrieving Known Items with LibX.
The Serials Librarian, 2007. To appear.
On 7/17/07, Jonathan Rochkind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does anyone have any decent open source code to parse a citation?
On 7/18/07, Steve Toub <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Agreed that a lookup against something like Google Scholar, Web of
Science, or a set of federated search targets instance may yield better
results. We've discussed by haven't done any testing.
Use your LibX edition, Steve. I can also send a dra
On 7/18/07, Jonathan Rochkind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nice, that might be what I need. Maybe I'll take a look at the LibX
code, it's open source, right?
Google Scholar has no API--you're screen scraping it?
Yes and yes.
- Godmar
Hi,
to offer some distraction from the code4lib.org topic (*), I'd like to
drop a pointer to our LibX edition builder interface, which allows
anybody to create and maintain LibX editions.
It is located at http://libx.org/editionbuilder
A more lengthy description can be found here:
http://www.mozd
That's easy. Just build a LibX edition, configure Worldcat as a
catalog, and hit "make live".
It took me all of 60 seconds to build this.
It can be download from here:
http://libx.org/editions/download.php?edition=6B89FDBE
A version for IE can be downloaded from:
http://libx.org/editions/libxtest
FWIW, if we really wanted to, we could process COinS even if they show
up via AJAX (at least in FF via DOMChanged event.)
- Godmar
On 9/27/07, Reese, Terry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> COINs are included in the output, but because the current pages are loaded
> via AJAX, the data isn't visible
You're using IE, which means you need to issue the open() before
adding the onreadystatechange handler.
Otherwise, open will trigger a call to your handler, and IE's
implementation won't have reset the readyState to 0.
In either event, you should double-check that the status of the
request is 200
To add a bit of experience gained from 13 years of Java programming: I
strongly recommend against setting CLASSPATH in the shell. Instead,
use either the -cp switch to java, as in
java -cp lucene-core...jar:lucene-demo-.jar
or use the "env" command in Unix, as in
env
CLASSPATH=/home/eric/l
On Jan 26, 2008 10:12 AM, Godmar Back <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Note, however, that this rule does not apply to shell scripts: inside
> shell scripts, it's okay to export CLASSPATH because such settings
> will be valid only for the shell executing the script; in Unix,
&
On Jan 27, 2008 5:40 PM, Eric Lease Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is the most respected (useful, understandable) XML Java package?
>
> In a few fits of creative rage, I have managed to write my first Java
> programs. I can now index plain text files with Lucene and search the
> index. I
I haven't used Castor for mixed content, but obviously, mixed content
is more difficult to map to Java types, even if you have a schema. I
probably wouldn't use Castor in those situations. Otherwise, it - or a
tool like it that can map schemata to Java types for automatic
parsing, generation, and v
If you're doing this in Java, use the java.util.concurrent package and
its Executor and Future framework, instead of using Thread.start/join,
synchronized etc. directly.
Get the book "Concurrent Programming in Java: Design Principles and
Patterns" (ISBN 0-201-31009-0) written by the master himsel
Hi Tim,
I think this proposal suffers from the same shortcoming as
LibraryThing's widgets, which is that only one per page is allowed. A
better way may be to use spans and classes and keep the JavaScript in
a library.
I've attached the resulting HTML below; see http://libx.org/gbs/ for a demo.
-
FWIW, realize that this is client-side mashup. Google will see
individual requests from individual IP addresses from everybody
viewing your page. For each IP address from which it sees requests
it'll decide whether to block or not. It'll block if it thinks you're
harvesting their data.
Wageningen
Although I completely agree that server-side queryability is something
we should ask from Google, I'd like to follow up on:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Jonathan Rochkind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The
> architecture of SFX would make it hard to implement Google Books API
> access as pure
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 11:13 AM, Tim Spalding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > limits. I don't think it's a strict hits-per-day, I think it's heuristic
> > software meant to stop exactly what we'd be trying to do, server-side
> > machine-based access.
>
> Aren't we still talking about covers?
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Jonathan Rochkind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, the SFX architecture has a feature called "display logic" that
> let's you on the server side determine how the menu will display based
> on what services are available. This is more obviously relevant to
> "d
JavaScript as a language has a number of severe limitations regarding
name spaces, dependencies, etc., but well-written, object-oriented
JavaScript as that you'd produce when you build an application using a
library such as prototype actually isn't too bad and (I believe)
provides reasonably good s
Good, but why limit it to 1 class per span?
My proposal separates different functionality in multiple classes,
allowing the user to mix and match. If you limit yourself to 1 class,
you have to provide classes for all possible combinations a user might
want, such as: "gbsv-link-to-preview-with-thum
Have you tried placing your code in an window.onload handler? Read
the example I created at libx.org/gbs and if that works for you in
IE6, use the technique there. (Or you may just use the entire script -
it seems you're reimplementing a lot of it anyway.)
- Godmar
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 9:09
l wait until after Easter).
>
> Cheers,
>
> David
>
>
>
> On 20/03/2008, Godmar Back <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Have you tried placing your code in an window.onload handler? Read
> > the example I created at libx.org/gbs and
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 12:44 PM, KREYCHE, MICHAEL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>
> > Behalf Of Godmar Back
> > Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 10:45 AM
> > To: CO
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Joe Hourcle
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Mar 2008, Ed Summers wrote:
>
> > FWIW, I agree with Karen and Alexander. The whole point (to my
> > recollection) of creating code4lib in the first place was to create a
> > venue where any aspect of computer
Could you share, briefly, what this API actually does (if doing so
doesn't violate your NDA?)
- Godmar
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Yitzchak Schaffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > From: Code for Libraries on behalf of Yitzchak Schaffer
> > Sent: Wed 4/2/2008 12:28 PM
> > To: CODE4LIB@LIS
Although there are many factors that determine the success or failure
of an open source project, experience has shown that open source
projects are highly successful only if at least one of the following
two applies:
a) They use a "implement first, then share, then standardize" approach
(think: ea
Hi,
for an investigation/study, I'm looking to obtain a representative
sample set (say a few hundreds) of ISBNs. For instance, the sample
could represent LoC's holdings (or some other acceptable/meaningful
population in the library world).
Does anybody have any pointers/ideas on how I might go ab
45056
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 847 672-9609
> 847 894-3911 cell
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Godmar Back
> Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 8:35 AM
> To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
> Subj
_records_scriblio_net
>
> Then run a script using your favorite MARC parsing library (mine
> currently is pymarc):
>
> from pymarc import MARCReader
>
> for record in MARCReader(file('part01.dat')):
> if record['020'] and record['020']['
Hi,
here's a pointer to follow up on the earlier discussion on how to
integrate Google books viewability API into closed legacy systems that
allow only limited control regarding what is being output, such as
III's Millennium system. Compared to other solutions, no JavaScript
programming is require
Hi,
to examine the usability of Google's book viewability API when lookup
is done via ISBN, we did some experiments, the results of which I'd
like to share. [1]
For 1000 randomly drawn ISBN from 3,192,809 ISBN extracted from a
snapshot of LoC's records [2], Google Books returned results for 852
I
ogle's given reason]: It doesn't allow Google to tailor the
> > results to the end-users location (determined by IP).
> >
> > Including an x-forwarded-for header _may_ get around #2 or #3. Including
> > an x-forwarded-for header should probably be conside
rver-side in general, but I'm still
> nervous about doing this, and wish that Google would just plain say they
> allow server-side calls.
>
>
>
>
>
> Godmar Back wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > here's a pointer to follow up on the earlier discussion on
ps: the distribution of the full text availability for the sample
considered was as follows:
No preview: 797 (93.5%)
Partial preview: 53 (6.2%)
Full text: 2 (0.2%)
- Godmar
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 6:09 PM, Godmar Back <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> to examine the usabil
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 8:24 PM, Tim Spalding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 0.2% full text? Yowch!
>
> Do academic libraries with full-text versions of the book on their
> shelves really want to point people to no-preview pages on Google.
In the example I show on the slides to which I pointed, the
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 11:02 PM, Michelle Watson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is there something in the code that prevents the link from being
> offered unless it goes to at least a partial preview (which I take to
> mean scanned pages), or have I just been lucky in my searching? I
> can't c
Mark,
I'll answer this one on list, but let's take discussion that is
specifically related to GBS classes off-list since you're asking
questions about this particular software --- I had sent the first
email to Code4Lib because I felt that our method of integrating the
Google Book viewability API i
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Dr R. Sanderson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Like what? The current API seems to be concerned with search. Search
> is what SRU does well. If it was concerned with harvest, I (and I'm
> sure many others) would have instead suggested OAI-PMH.
>
No, the API p
Hi,
may I tap the collective wisdom of this list?
Is anybody using III's Encore system and happens to know if there is a
deep-linking syntax, either documented or inferred, for it?
Thanks.
- Godmar
Generally, you won't find a credible site that would allow you to
upload unvetted binaries of adapted versions of low-volume software.
The obvious risks are just too high.
My recommendation would be a personal webpage, hosted on a site that's
associated with a real-world institution, and a real-wo
101 - 139 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
