eader
The latter has the advantage of being an existing way of doing it, but I wonder
how fiddly it might be to implement, while a simple file in a known location
might be easier. Anyway, thoughts appreciated - and alternatives to these of
course. One obvious alternative that I keep coming back to
thinking, maybe we should
just use a web crawler and ignore OAI-PMH but I guess this was we maybe get the
best of both worlds).
Thanks again (and of course further thoughts welcome)
Owen
Owen Stephens
Owen Stephens Consulting
Web: http://www.ostephens.com
Email: o...@ostephens.com
Telephone: 01
On 24 Feb 2012, at 16:52, Ian Ibbotson wrote:
> Sorry.. late to the discussion...
>
> Isn't this a little apples and oranges?
>
> Surely robots.txt exists because many static resources are served directly
> from a tree structured filesystem?
>
> (Nearly) all OAI requests are responded to by spe
On 24 Feb 2012, at 18:20, Joe Hourcle wrote:
> On Feb 24, 2012, at 9:25 AM, Kyle Banerjee wrote:
> I see it like the people who request that their pages not be cached elsewhere
> -- they want to make their object 'discoverable', but they want to control
> the access to those objects -- so it's o
at both web crawlers, and any other mechanisms like
OAI-PMH can follow
I realise these may not be achievable, but just my thoughts
Owen
Owen Stephens
Owen Stephens Consulting
Web: http://www.ostephens.com
Email: o...@ostephens.com
Telephone: 0121 288 6936
On 25 Feb 2012, at 22:18, Peter Noerr
On 24 Feb 2012, at 18:20, Joe Hourcle wrote:
>
> I see it like the people who request that their pages not be cached elsewhere
> -- they want to make their object 'discoverable', but they want to control
> the access to those objects -- so it's one thing for a search engine to get a
> copy, but
e two wrongs don't make a right, it seems to us that if
repositories are not preventing Google (or others - for example notably
CiteSeerX is in the business of crawling repositories
http://csxstatic.ist.psu.edu/about/crawler) crawling/indexing/caching their
content, then we hope that a n
On 27 Feb 2012, at 13:31, Diane Hillmann wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 5:25 AM, Owen Stephens wrote:
>
>>
> providers provide such intermediate pages (arxiv.org, for instance). The
> other issue driving providers towards intermediate pages is that it allows
> them
question of the indexing of library catalogues by
search engines.
Thanks again to all who have contributed to the discussion - very useful
Owen
Owen Stephens
Owen Stephens Consulting
Web: http://www.ostephens.com
Email: o...@ostephens.com
Telephone: 0121 288 6936
On 1 Mar 2012, at 11:42, Ed Summer
embargoed papers (as per Raffaele's suggestion); how to deal with
>multi-part resources etc. Anything coming out of the project would, of course,
>be just one projects recommendations for JISC to consider not more than that.
Cheers,
Owen
Owen Stephens
Owen Stephens Consulting
Web:
ng supported by DevCSI (http://devcsi.ukoln.ac.uk/about/)
I hope some of you can make it
Owen
--
Owen Stephens Consulting
http://ostephens.com
e: o...@ostephens.com
t: 0121 288 6936
skype: owen.stephens
es.
> Though
> mapping from an IP address to its owner is not the same as listing IP
> ranges associated with an organization (many include multiple discontiguous
> CIDR ranges), I note that some of this information is also public via the
> BGP-advertised IP-prefixes for an institutio
https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/5RH8KH8
Thanks and best wishes
Owen
Owen Stephens
Owen Stephens Consulting
Web: http://www.ostephens.com
Email: o...@ostephens.com
Telephone: 0121 288 6936
On 3 Aug 2012, at 15:56, Joseph Montibello
wrote:
> search, you could probably do worse than to install Blacklight. It
> probably doesn't really meet the "simple" criteria - there's a lot more to
> it than I could talk about. But getting it out of the box, turned on, and
> searching against a f
The JISC funded CLOCK project did some thinking around cataloguing processes
and tracking changes to statements and/or records - e.g.
http://clock.blogs.lincoln.ac.uk/2012/05/23/its-a-model-and-its-looking-good/
Not solutions of course, but hopefully of interest
Owen
Owen Stephens
Owen
s%20upload/ica12Final00423.pd
f
Owen
Owen Stephens
Owen Stephens Consulting
Web: http://www.ostephens.com
Email: o...@ostephens.com
Telephone: 0121 288 6936
s it that the code4lib list doesn't satisfy
that people would like to see from a UK based list?
Owen
Owen Stephens
Owen Stephens Consulting
Web: http://www.ostephens.com
Email: o...@ostephens.com
Telephone: 0121 288 6936
On 8 Oct 2012, at 09:14, Richard Wallis wrote:
&
No idea if this is useful, but just to note that RefWorks also has an API in
case that offers any more options to you in terms of pushing the data around
http://rwt.refworks.com/rwapireference/
Owen
Owen Stephens
Owen Stephens Consulting
Web: http://www.ostephens.com
Email: o...@ostephens.com
run
sets of rules across data sets from specific sources. We should be making
progress on this in the next couple of months.
Hope that's helpful
Owen
Owen Stephens
Owen Stephens Consulting
Web: http://www.ostephens.com
Email: o...@ostephens.com
Telephone: 0121 288 6936
On 16 Oct 2012, a
Are there any examples of data in this format in the wild we can look at?
Also given KBART and ONIX for Serials Online Holdings have NISO involvement, is
there any view on how these two activities complement each other?
Thanks,
Owen
Owen Stephens
Owen Stephens Consulting
Web: http
t the moment the question of
uptake/compliance is the bigger issue.
Owen
Owen Stephens
Owen Stephens Consulting
Web: http://www.ostephens.com
Email: o...@ostephens.com
Telephone: 0121 288 6936
On 17 Oct 2012, at 14:48, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
> I've always been a fan of ONIX for SOH, a
>
> This leads to three follow-up questions.
>
> First, is there software to translate/normalize existing vendor lists from
> vendors that have not yet adopted either of these standards into these
> formats? I'm thinking of a collection of adapters or converters, perhaps.
> Each would likely cons
recommender API based
on the data http://copac.ac.uk/innovations/activity-data/?page_id=227
Owen
Owen Stephens
Owen Stephens Consulting
Web: http://www.ostephens.com
Email: o...@ostephens.com
Telephone: 0121 288 6936
On 26 Oct 2012, at 23:04, Jimmy Ghaphery wrote:
> Are there any ot
According to the MARC spec, 035 doesn't support '9' as a valid indicator. My
very uneducated guess would be the invalid indicator is causing the underlying
system not to index it?
Owen Stephens
Owen Stephens Consulting
Web: http://www.ostephens.com
Email: o...@ostephens.com
Tele
Thanks Karen - probably should have known that! That's the nice thing about
MARC - always some new thing to cope with :)
Owen
Owen Stephens
Owen Stephens Consulting
Web: http://www.ostephens.com
Email: o...@ostephens.com
Telephone: 0121 288 6936
On 6 Nov 2012, at 19:37, Karen Coyle
ists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-schemabibex/ or wiki
http://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/wiki/Main_Page
Owen
Owen Stephens
Owen Stephens Consulting
Web: http://www.ostephens.com
Email: o...@ostephens.com
Telephone: 0121 288 6936
On 21 Nov 2012, at 07:37, Dave Caroline wrote:
&g
of the question is 'what metadata should
be included in the OpenURL to give it the best chance of working with a link
resolver'?
Owen Stephens
Owen Stephens Consulting
Web: http://www.ostephens.com
Email: o...@ostephens.com
Telephone: 0121 288 6936
On 20 Nov 2012, at 19:39, Da
Failure rate on resolving DOIs via CrossRef is high enough that I'd argue for
belt && braces
Owen
Owen Stephens
Owen Stephens Consulting
Web: http://www.ostephens.com
Email: o...@ostephens.com
Telephone: 0121 288 6936
On 21 Nov 2012, at 15:08, "Young,Jeff (OR)" wrote:
el?
Owen
Owen Stephens
Owen Stephens Consulting
Web: http://www.ostephens.com
Email: o...@ostephens.com
Telephone: 0121 288 6936
On 29 Nov 2012, at 22:51, William Denton wrote:
> On 29 November 2012, Cary Gordon wrote:
>
>> Obviously, we need to offer trainings on how to get funding to
I'm not familiar with what XMP RDF/XML looks like but it might be worth using
an RDF parser rather than using XSLT?
Graphite (http://graphite.ecs.soton.ac.uk/) is pretty easy to use if you are
comfortable with PHP
Owen
On 14 Jan 2013, at 19:09, Kyle Banerjee wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at
Owen Stephens
Owen Stephens Consulting
Web: http://www.ostephens.com
Email: o...@ostephens.com
Telephone: 0121 288 6936
> On 12 Apr 2016, at 16:05, Tom Cramer wrote:
>
> The IJNet article is particularly interesting—thanks for posting this.
> Excerpts like the one below make me wo
101 - 131 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
