Re: [CODE4LIB] Durability of PDFs

2009-06-15 Thread Benjamin O'Steen
There are items/options that can be used within a given PDF that will
drastically affect how likely it is that the PDF will still be readable.

* Inclusion of 3D applets or any Adobe Acrobat specific features
I have seen PDFs with 3D chemical applets embedded somehow into the PDF
using a plugin. The longevity of this addon depends entirely on how long
the company/team that made the plugin, wants to support it.

* DRM of any kind - password-protected, print-disabled, etc
These features make it hard, verging on the legally impossible to
migrate the PDF to a newer format or read it on newer versions of
Acrobat or other PDF viewers. (Legally impossible, as circumventing this
would incur the wrath of the DMCA)

* Any other odd features.

There is a profile, which doesn't allow you to add any of the above, and
it is often referred to as PDF/A (A for Archival format)

The easiest way to create these at the moment, is to use OpenOffice 3
and choose the Save As PDF and tick the PDF/A option.

As for not becoming unreadable.. well, this all depends on age (and so
the version) of the PDF, and your current viewing software. I have
already had situations where older PDFs cannot be viewed correctly in
newer readers (majority of these were due to older 'print-ready' pdfs
with colour-information held within)

And this doesn't include the various issues that can arise from fonts
not being included or present on the client's system, 'print' fonts that
compress letters in interesting ways (fi - single character, but a
non-unicode one), images that do not display, incomplete PDFs due to bad
exports that silently fail, etc.

My advice is to keep the source files alongside, especially if they are
in (la)tex or HTML. Text is always parsable.

Ben

On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 11:37 +0100, Mike Taylor wrote:
 Dear CODE4LIB colleagues,
 
 In one of my alternative incarnations, I am a zoological taxonomist.
 One of the big issues for taxonomy right now is whether to accept as
 nomenclaturally valid papers that are published only in electronic
 form, i.e. not printed on paper by a publisher.
 
 In a discussion of this matter, a colleague has claimed:
 
  [PDF files will not become unreadable] in the next 30-40 years.
  Possibly not in the 20 years that will follow. After that, when only
  30-year and older documents are in the PDF format, the danger will
  increase that this information will not be readable any more. It is
  generally considered as quite unlikely that PDF will be readable in
  100 years.
 
 I would appreciate any comments that anyone on this list has on the
 likelihood that PDF will be unreadable in 100 years.
 
 Many thanks,
 
  _/|_  ___
 /o ) \/  Mike Taylorm...@indexdata.comhttp://www.miketaylor.org.uk
 )_v__/\  Can't someone act COMPLETELY OUT OF CHARACTER without arousing
suspicion? -- Bob the Angry Flower, www.angryflower.com


[CODE4LIB] Position available, Project Analyst, Oxford University (kw's: semantic web, linked data)

2008-10-14 Thread Benjamin O'Steen
In a nutshell, we are building a system to capture the research
information infrastructure: linking people, departments, grants,
funders, articles, theses, books and data together. 

(Technical information: using RDF and a mix of published and homegrown
ontologies, and using an objectstore to act as a serialised, archival
base for the information. Evidence, context and provenance will be a
strong focus.)

 Forwarded Message 
 From: Sally Rumsey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: BRII job ad

 OXFORD UNIVERSITY LIBRARY SERVICES, Systems and E-Research Service
 (SERS)
 
 Building the Research Information Infrastructure (BRII) Project
 
 BRII Project Analyst
 
 Oxford
 
 Grade 7: Salary £27,466 - £33,780 p.a.
 
 Full time, fixed term to March 2010
 
  
 
 ORA (Oxford University Research Archive) the repository for Oxford
 research outputs and Oxford Medical Sciences Division Research
 Database Service have joined forces to create an innovative solution
 for research information management. The JISC-funded project to create
 this new system, BRII, will forge connections between researchers,
 grants, projects and publications. It will provide web-based services
 to disseminate and reuse this information in new contexts and for new
 purposes.
 
  
 
 We are seeking a project analyst who has excellent demonstrable
 communication skills, both written and oral, who will liaise between
 BRII project staff including software developers, and members of staff
 in academic and administrative departments across the University. You
 will be able to communicate the purpose and design of the project,
 technical developments and plans to non-technical end users.
 
  
 
 Working as part of a small team, your duties will include running
 stakeholder and user analyses, synthesising the findings and
 translating them into requirements to be used by technical developers.
 You will consult with end users, be involved with running testing and
 with dissemination of the project.
 
  
 
 Further details and application form are available from OULS
 Personnel: tel 01865 277622, or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] From
 17th October further details and an application form available from
 www.ox.ac.uk/about_the_university/jobs/index.html. The revised closing
 date for applications is 5pm on Friday 7th November 2008. 
 
  
 
 Please quote reference BL8088
 
  
 
 The University of Oxford is an equal opportunities employer
 
 _
 
 Sally Rumsey
 
 ORA Service  Development Manager
 
 Oxford University Library Services
 
 University of Oxford
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 01865 283860