The server does have trac installed and a project is/was using it. So
if we need to add more projects just let me know, and/or whomever
wants to be the point for trac.
On Apr 2, 2008, at 12:50 PM, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
Good point, agreed. But we've got what we've got, and what we've got
can
w
hi all,
in case you want to restore trac - presumably with subversion
repositories - i'd volunteer to admin these apps.
i guess i'm rather unknown, but looking at
https://dev.livingreviews.org/projects/ and
https://dev.livingreviews.org/projects/epubtk/
and https://dev.livingreviews.org/projects/ep
Good point, agreed. But we've got what we've got, and what we've got can
work better if we don't rely on Ryan (who has another job) only to admin
it. Even if we had an agreed moratorium on ever adding anything else, I
still think we need to deal with a way to get other code4lib volunteers
to have
Oops, if I said "Jeff" I meant Jeremy/"jaf" of course. Somehow "jaf"
turned to "jeff" in my typing fingers, after typing Ryan's actual first
name. :) Jeremy Frumkin.
Jonathan
On 3/21/08 8:13 AM, "Jonathan Rochkind" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So as many of you know, OSU is now hosting the cod
While I have no comment on this particular issue (since nobody wants
me adminning *anything*), I would like to propose that before we set
up any new services/applications on code4lib.org, we talk about
whether or not any of the existing applications have functionality
that could suffice.
I guess m
Okay, so new plan for access to code4lib server, since nobody stepped up
to want to be an app admin junta. :) Subject to approval by Ryan and
Jeff, of course. Recall that Ryan and Jeff at OSU say they are ready to
grant shell access to code4libbers, but weren't sure how to figure out
_who_ to gr
I thought it had cosmic mileage myself...
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Karen Coyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I did, but I assumed I am missing some inside knowledge that would make
> it non-comic.
>
> kc
>
> Rob Styles wrote:
> > On 21 Mar 2008, at 16:23, Kevin S. Clarke wrote:
> >> Y
I did, but I assumed I am missing some inside knowledge that would make
it non-comic.
kc
Rob Styles wrote:
On 21 Mar 2008, at 16:23, Kevin S. Clarke wrote:
You and someone else could
run the planet
did nobody think the idea that jrochkind and someone else "running the
planet" has some comic
"I don't want the world, I just want your half."
--Jonathan Rochkind, 2008
more or less
-Ross.
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 8:09 AM, Rob Styles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 21 Mar 2008, at 16:23, Kevin S. Clarke wrote:
> > You and someone else could
> > run the planet
>
> did nobody think the
On 21 Mar 2008, at 16:23, Kevin S. Clarke wrote:
You and someone else could
run the planet
did nobody think the idea that jrochkind and someone else "running the
planet" has some comic mileage?
rob
Yeah, I've been talking to Ryan and Jeremy on this too, but perhaps they
can chime in. What we're talking about should be within the realm of
possibility on the OSU hosted server, I think. They've got it fairly
isolated from the rest of the OSU stuff, I think.
Ryan Ordway, as part of his job at
On Fri, 21 Mar 2008, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
I think that by allowing a larger group of people in, we get more done
and have _better_ services. But there's definitely a balancing act,
between stability and more hands. I don't want to see it balanced too
much toward stability 'guarantees' thou
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 12:16 PM, Jonathan Rochkind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So maybe that's the answer right there. We find 2-3 people to take
> _primary_ app-level responsibility for code4lib.org (ryan ordway still
> has primary OS-level responsibility), and they are the junta. If someone
I think that by allowing a larger group of people in, we get more done
and have _better_ services. But there's definitely a balancing act,
between stability and more hands. I don't want to see it balanced too
much toward stability 'guarantees' though. Letting in people we trust to
know what they
I agree in as much as I think there needs to be a clear avenue for new
people to get involved...and not just knowing the right person to ask
at the right time of day on IRC.
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Roy Tennant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think this is yet another example of the group
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 11:13 AM, Jonathan Rochkind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pre-OSU hosting, code4lib
> was hosted by a defined group of code4libbers who chipped in for hosting
> fees, and were the only ones who had shell access. If you wanted shell
> access, as I understand it, you'd have
I think this is yet another example of the group maturing to the point of
needing a tad more structure. One way we can provide this is to elect a
board that manages administrative stuff like this. But to do that we'd
probably need some bylaws, even if not formally part of a 501c3 process. The
bylaw
Speaking of the *.code4lib.org domain .. if there's a code4lib
service you'd like to offer on your own server and want it at the
code4lib domain let me know and I'll add an ARECORD for you to
DNS.
So as many of you know, OSU is now hosting the code4lib.org server, with
the various code4lib community apps running on it. Jeremy Frumkin's
group hosts it, and Ryan Ordway does the heavy sysadmin lifting.
They're now ready to start granting other people shell access to the
machine to manage/admi
19 matches
Mail list logo
