There is actually already a OJS sandbox installation on Code4Lib.
Jonathan Rochkind appears to be getting things organized so if anyone
really wants to help you should probably talk to him.
Eby
On 4/16/07, Bigwood, David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When considering tools, the PKP (Public Knowled
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007, Ryan Eby wrote:
Perhaps we could start by putting together a few "anthology" issues
similar to what was planned as the lulu/print anthologies that Dchud
started organizing?
Methinks pbinkley gets/takes the credit/blame for starting and organizing
and starting organizing, a
When considering tools, the PKP (Public Knowledge Project) in Canada has
an open-source toolkit for publishing a journal. It includes tools for
submission, peer-review, editing and publishing.
Sincerely,
David Bigwood
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lunar and Planetary Institute
: CODE4LIB@listserv.nd.edu
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Code4Lib journal idea revival?
Rather than create something new, is it worth looking at ways to align this
need with existing infrastructure at Ariadne, D-Lib, etc?
Maybe even get some of those evil vendors to underwrite some of the costs,
in t
If your interested then pop on channel or let me know. I threw
together a OJS sandbox for jrochkind to play with on the code4lib
site.
Eby
On 4/12/07, Eric Lease Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Apr 11, 2007, at 10:01 AM, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
> I think such a journal could play a reall
On Apr 11, 2007, at 10:01 AM, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
I think such a journal could play a really important role, currently
lacking, in the library community
I would like to participate in the creation of code4LibJour, or
whatever. For a limited period of time I would be willing to spend
On 4/11/07, Ryan Eby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Perhaps we could start by putting together a few "anthology" issues
similar to what was planned as the lulu/print anthologies that Dchud
started organizing? While planet and code4lib can act as it, I think
it would work best with the issue-like syst
Perhaps we could start by putting together a few "anthology" issues
similar to what was planned as the lulu/print anthologies that Dchud
started organizing? While planet and code4lib can act as it, I think
it would work best with the issue-like system similar to a journal.
Eby
On 4/11/07, Jonath
Here's the original thread of 02/2006 for anyone who's interested:
http://www.mail-archive.com/code4lib@listserv.nd.edu/msg00235.html
eby
On 4/11/07, Jonathan Rochkind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think it was this past summer that there was some energy on starting a
'Code4Lib journal', that s
I agree wholeheartedly with James on the technical
recommendation to continue using Drupal and supporting OJS. We have
to walk the talk in terms of supporting Open
Access/Data/Source. Since modes of scholarly communication are
evolving under our noses I also really like the idea of trying
somet
What I would envision is something occupying a space in between a
traditional print journal and the diffuse collection of blog entries and
IRC chats etc. that makes up our communities current communications.
It should be much easier, take much less time, to write an article for
"Code4Lib Journal"
Since code4lib is running drupal, wouldn't it make sense to leverage
that platform and use their e-journal module
(http://drupal.org/project/ejournal), an outgrowth of open journal
system (http://pkp.sfu.ca/?q=ojs)?
BTW, I'm all for a code4lib journal; but in many ways, I see the
code4lib site as
ally see
a huge need to align ourselves with another journal or organization, but
if others see benefit, that is fine with me.
Edward
> Original message
>>Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 11:13:58 -0400
>>From: Ryan Eby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB
Well I don't think there was any real interest in having a journal on
the level of an actual publisher. It seemed more on the alignment of
something like First Monday but with even less structure/schedule.
From what I remember, which may be wrong, it was more of a collection
of community output
Original message
>Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 11:13:58 -0400
>From: Ryan Eby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Code4Lib journal idea revival?
>To: CODE4LIB@listserv.nd.edu
>
>I think there was also a plan for an anthology that could be wrapped
>into th
Rather than create something new, is it worth looking at ways to align this
need with existing infrastructure at Ariadne, D-Lib, etc?
Maybe even get some of those evil vendors to underwrite some of the costs,
in the name of nurturing market innovation, etc?
Or is the need actually already filled/
See
http://www.emeraldinsight.com/info/products_services/new_journals/guidelines.jsp
for how to propose a new journal with Emerald. A more traditional, though good,
publisher..
See
http://www.doaj.org/doaj?func=subject&cpid=129
You all might look at this listing of open access journals in L
I think there was also a plan for an anthology that could be wrapped
into the first few issues. I'm not sure if that project fizzled or not
either. The woes of a volunteer force with little free time.
I also think Open Journal System was debated for use, as a few people
on irc are hacking away on
You might want to listen to this podcast on Open Access journals - it might
give you some ideas on how to handle a project like this.
http://www.web2learning.net/archives/941
Nicole
On 4/11/07, Jonathan Rochkind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think it was this past summer that there was some en
I think it was this past summer that there was some energy on starting a
'Code4Lib journal', that seems to have died out.
I think such a journal could play a really important role, currently
lacking, in the library community. Currently there are a bunch of people
working on similar projects who d
20 matches
Mail list logo
