Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy
On 1/26/15 10:06 AM, Mark A. Matienzo wrote: Thanks, Galen. I'm solidly +1 on this, and I would be very happy to hear if there were some sort of mechanism in place for the 2015 conference. I do realize that this might add to the burden of the host committee, so I'd be happy to help make this happen. Would this be an acceptable solution? I purchase these (will work out details for number with local cmte) prior to my arrival. http://www.staples.com/Avery-5795-Round-1-4-inch-Diameter-Color-Coding-Labels-Assorted-Colors/product_298182 I can leave these with the registration desk. (Based on the picture there) it looks like it has the red, yellow, green colours. During registration users can pick their preferred colour and affix those to their name badges. Admittedly not as visible as a lanyard but we have to start some place. Cheers, ./fxk Mark -- Q: What is printed on the bottom of beer bottles in Minnesota? A: Open other end.
Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy
Thanks, Galen. I'm solidly +1 on this, and I would be very happy to hear if there were some sort of mechanism in place for the 2015 conference. I do realize that this might add to the burden of the host committee, so I'd be happy to help make this happen. Mark
Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy
One potential problem with ribbons is that there may be ribbon-fans who also don't want to be photographed, and a blank ribbon in the midst of a sea of others might get lost. One option might be to choose a bright color (red might be a good mnemonic) and have participants who don't want to be photoed put it on the SIDE of their badge -- the special location would be a good indicator that the ribbon has importance and would make it stand out. We'd need to ensure that everyone got the message about what the ribbon meant, though. On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Becky Yoose b.yo...@gmail.com wrote: Francis, Another thing you could do is to buy blank ribbons; see http://www.pcnametag.com/4-x-1-5-8-custom-name-badge-ribbon-blank-item-sscusb for an example. These would be more visible, at least, though the green might conflict with the darker green First timer badge ribbons I have for the conference. Thanks, Becky On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Francis Kayiwa kay...@pobox.com wrote: On 1/26/15 10:06 AM, Mark A. Matienzo wrote: Thanks, Galen. I'm solidly +1 on this, and I would be very happy to hear if there were some sort of mechanism in place for the 2015 conference. I do realize that this might add to the burden of the host committee, so I'd be happy to help make this happen. Would this be an acceptable solution? I purchase these (will work out details for number with local cmte) prior to my arrival. http://www.staples.com/Avery-5795-Round-1-4-inch-Diameter- Color-Coding-Labels-Assorted-Colors/product_298182 I can leave these with the registration desk. (Based on the picture there) it looks like it has the red, yellow, green colours. During registration users can pick their preferred colour and affix those to their name badges. Admittedly not as visible as a lanyard but we have to start some place. Cheers, ./fxk Mark -- Q: What is printed on the bottom of beer bottles in Minnesota? A: Open other end.
Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy
Francis, Another thing you could do is to buy blank ribbons; see http://www.pcnametag.com/4-x-1-5-8-custom-name-badge-ribbon-blank-item-sscusb for an example. These would be more visible, at least, though the green might conflict with the darker green First timer badge ribbons I have for the conference. Thanks, Becky On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Francis Kayiwa kay...@pobox.com wrote: On 1/26/15 10:06 AM, Mark A. Matienzo wrote: Thanks, Galen. I'm solidly +1 on this, and I would be very happy to hear if there were some sort of mechanism in place for the 2015 conference. I do realize that this might add to the burden of the host committee, so I'd be happy to help make this happen. Would this be an acceptable solution? I purchase these (will work out details for number with local cmte) prior to my arrival. http://www.staples.com/Avery-5795-Round-1-4-inch-Diameter- Color-Coding-Labels-Assorted-Colors/product_298182 I can leave these with the registration desk. (Based on the picture there) it looks like it has the red, yellow, green colours. During registration users can pick their preferred colour and affix those to their name badges. Admittedly not as visible as a lanyard but we have to start some place. Cheers, ./fxk Mark -- Q: What is printed on the bottom of beer bottles in Minnesota? A: Open other end.
[CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy
Hi, I would like to propose that C4L adopt a policy requiring that consent be explicitly given to be photographed or recorded, along the lines of a policy adopted by the Evergreen Project. [1] Evergreen's policy was adapted from AdaCamp's photography policy. A blog post from Ada Initiative outlines their reasons for adopting the policy [2], but to summarize, some people simply dislike being photographed, while for others, being photographed without their consent or knowledge could expose them to personal danger (e.g., from stalkers). Consequently, it is possible that some folks who would otherwise be interested in going to Code4Lib may be unable or unwilling to attend absent a policy that allows them to opt into being photographed. Whether or not that is currently the case, I have heard from people who have expressed discomfort with being photographed. In the past, such policies have been implemented via use of colored (and patterned) lanyards. If such a policy is adopted, it may be impractical to source such lanyards in time for the 2015 conference, but alternatives such as stickers may be doable. But regardless of whether a photography policy is adopted, I would encourage attendees to ask for consent before taking photographs. [1] http://evergreen-ils.org/conference/photography-policy/ [2] https://adainitiative.org/2013/07/another-way-to-attract-women-to-conferences-photography-policies/ Regards, Galen -- Galen Charlton Manager of Implementation Equinox Software, Inc. / The Open Source Experts email: g...@esilibrary.com direct: +1 770-709-5581 cell: +1 404-984-4366 skype: gmcharlt web:http://www.esilibrary.com/ Supporting Koha and Evergreen: http://koha-community.org http://evergreen-ils.org
Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy
Hi, On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Galen Charlton g...@esilibrary.com wrote: For folks' consideration, here is a draft of the policy, which is based on the Evergreen and AdaCamp policies and adapted to C4L's needs and the feedback so far in this thread: https://gist.github.com/gmcharlt/8546dcb0ce2af580a476 Also, I would be remiss if I did not acknowledge that Kathy Lussier spearheaded the adoption of the Evergreen Project's policy. Regards, Galen -- Galen Charlton Manager of Implementation Equinox Software, Inc. / The Open Source Experts email: g...@esilibrary.com direct: +1 770-709-5581 cell: +1 404-984-4366 skype: gmcharlt web:http://www.esilibrary.com/ Supporting Koha and Evergreen: http://koha-community.org http://evergreen-ils.org
Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy
I think that requiring explicit permission from presenters is overly burdensome for the crew that is struggling to get the recordings up. I think that speakers and presenters should be informed that all presentations may be recorded and made available to the public unless they inform the conference committee that they do not want to be recorded before their presentation begins. If they object, the video crew will refrain from capturing their presentation. If we do screen capture again, it is possible that presenter could have the option of allowing us to record their voice and screen. Cary On Jan 26, 2015, at 10:58 AM, Andreas Orphanides akorp...@ncsu.edu wrote: We would definitely want to both give notice to the presenters that the plan is to record and to get consent (or dissent) ahead of time, so that we can plan AV appropriately if someone does not want to be broadcast. It would be awful to broadcast someone who didn't consent to it; nor would we want to have to disrupt things in progress to adjust for an unexpected dissent that should/could have been expected. On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Tara Robertson trobert...@langara.bc.ca wrote: I love this conversation. WRT presenters, I think it's good to be explicit that the plan is to stream and record. It would be good practice to have presenters sign a consent form agreeing to this. Tara On 26/01/2015 10:42 AM, Andreas Orphanides wrote: Sounds like we've got an established practice in place, then. Awesome. Wouldn't hurt for us to clarify any policy we decide on to state that presenters are welcome to not consent to webcast. On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:41 PM, William Denton w...@pobox.com wrote: On 26 January 2015, Andreas Orphanides wrote: Not to complicate things: shall (or *how shall*) we accommodate requests from presenters who might have a no photo preference vis-a-vis conference webcast? A few years ago a speaker didn't want to be filmed, and someone turned off the camera and put a paper bag over it for the duration. Bill -- William Denton ↔ Toronto, Canada ↔ https://www.miskatonic.org/ -- Tara Robertson Accessibility Librarian, CAPER-BC http://caperbc.ca/ T 604.323.5254 F 604.323.5954 trobert...@langara.bc.ca mailto:Tara%20Robertson%20% 3ctrobert...@langara.bc.ca%3E Langara. http://www.langara.bc.ca 100 West 49th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Y 2Z6
Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy
What more would be required than just putting a sheet of paper in front of the lens while filming? Honestly curious. Sarah Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 12:00:05 -0800 From: listu...@chillco.com Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU I think that requiring explicit permission from presenters is overly burdensome for the crew that is struggling to get the recordings up. I think that speakers and presenters should be informed that all presentations may be recorded and made available to the public unless they inform the conference committee that they do not want to be recorded before their presentation begins. If they object, the video crew will refrain from capturing their presentation. If we do screen capture again, it is possible that presenter could have the option of allowing us to record their voice and screen. Cary On Jan 26, 2015, at 10:58 AM, Andreas Orphanides akorp...@ncsu.edu wrote: We would definitely want to both give notice to the presenters that the plan is to record and to get consent (or dissent) ahead of time, so that we can plan AV appropriately if someone does not want to be broadcast. It would be awful to broadcast someone who didn't consent to it; nor would we want to have to disrupt things in progress to adjust for an unexpected dissent that should/could have been expected. On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Tara Robertson trobert...@langara.bc.ca wrote: I love this conversation. WRT presenters, I think it's good to be explicit that the plan is to stream and record. It would be good practice to have presenters sign a consent form agreeing to this. Tara On 26/01/2015 10:42 AM, Andreas Orphanides wrote: Sounds like we've got an established practice in place, then. Awesome. Wouldn't hurt for us to clarify any policy we decide on to state that presenters are welcome to not consent to webcast. On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:41 PM, William Denton w...@pobox.com wrote: On 26 January 2015, Andreas Orphanides wrote: Not to complicate things: shall (or *how shall*) we accommodate requests from presenters who might have a no photo preference vis-a-vis conference webcast? A few years ago a speaker didn't want to be filmed, and someone turned off the camera and put a paper bag over it for the duration. Bill -- William Denton ↔ Toronto, Canada ↔ https://www.miskatonic.org/ -- Tara Robertson Accessibility Librarian, CAPER-BC http://caperbc.ca/ T 604.323.5254 F 604.323.5954 trobert...@langara.bc.ca mailto:Tara%20Robertson%20% 3ctrobert...@langara.bc.ca%3E Langara. http://www.langara.bc.ca 100 West 49th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Y 2Z6
Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy
Not to complicate things: shall (or *how shall*) we accommodate requests from presenters who might have a no photo preference vis-a-vis conference webcast? Is webcasting incompatible with the photo policy? Do presenters tacitly consent to being filmed/broadcast as presenters? On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Mark A. Matienzo mark.matie...@gmail.com wrote: host_committee++ Re: policy, it seems like the AdaCamp policies are a good match to follow (e.g. http://montreal.adacamp.org/policies/#photo). It appears Evergreen has a policy based on AdaCamp's policy, with more detailed guidelines: http://evergreen-ils.org/conference/photography-policy/ Mark On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Tom Johnson johnson.tom+code4...@gmail.com wrote: This conversation moved fast! The host committee is purchasing colored lanyards (red, yellow, green) which can be used as photography consent indicators. Maybe someone can help us nail down a good policy and approach for communicating it? - Tom On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Sarah Shealy sarah.she...@outlook.com wrote: I see your point, nothing is 100% effective. Especially anywhere more than 4 or 5 people gather. I would think the first year of implementation would be more of a 'let everyone know' type deal. And the MC can also point out any changes in policy (not just this one) during breaks. However, with the lanyards/whatnot, the instances of unwanted photographs should go down. If you don't wear a badge/lanyard/etc you won't really have to worry about it. I'd suggest we have an addition to the policy that basically reads We understand that many people will not know about this policy, and on a first incident someone taking an unwanted photograph is told about the policy. Afterwards, the case(s) will be handled as determined by x. There should also be a part that says If the lanyard/badge/whatnot is not clearly visible, the picture taker should be informed of the issue and remove the image from the phone/camera. No one can control what happens to participants outside of the venue, unfortunately, but hopefully other Code4Libbers would still abide by the policy. This isn't meant to restrict your freedom or get people in trouble. It's to protect those who feel they need protection. I wouldn't use a lanyard/badge/whatnot personally (if voluntary - if you have to choose a color on registration, obviously I would), but I'm not going to make others feel as though they're in the wrong for choosing to do it. Did all of that make sense? Sarah Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 08:52:18 -0800 From: kyle.baner...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 6:58 AM, Galen Charlton g...@esilibrary.com wrote: I would like to propose that C4L adopt a policy requiring that consent be explicitly given to be photographed or recorded, along the lines of a policy adopted by the Evergreen Project. [1] As a practical matter, this is functionally equivalent to prohibiting photography except for arranged photos which will need something simple (like pictures of cameras and mikes with slashes through them posted throughout the venue) to communicate the policy. Differential badges, lanyards, etc will not always be visible, and not all people will notice them, be aware of what they mean, or can be assumed to be familiar with a written policy. On an aside note, a lot of activity occurs outside the official venues and it is in these areas where people might be most vulnerable to unwanted photos. kyle
Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy
On 26 January 2015, Andreas Orphanides wrote: Not to complicate things: shall (or *how shall*) we accommodate requests from presenters who might have a no photo preference vis-a-vis conference webcast? A few years ago a speaker didn't want to be filmed, and someone turned off the camera and put a paper bag over it for the duration. Bill -- William Denton ↔ Toronto, Canada ↔ https://www.miskatonic.org/
Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy
I think this is all good stuff too, but my old Hippy soul cringes at unnecessary paperwork. A consent form means nothing. Situations change. Even a well-intended agreement sometimes needs to be reneged on. I think it's just best that the presenters understand what the best hopes for their presentation are, that they express what their actual plans are and the hosts need to be flexible enough to accommodate changes. Ralph -Original Message- From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Tara Robertson Sent: Monday, January 26, 2015 1:56 PM To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU Subject: Re: Conference photography policy I love this conversation. WRT presenters, I think it's good to be explicit that the plan is to stream and record. It would be good practice to have presenters sign a consent form agreeing to this. Tara On 26/01/2015 10:42 AM, Andreas Orphanides wrote: Sounds like we've got an established practice in place, then. Awesome. Wouldn't hurt for us to clarify any policy we decide on to state that presenters are welcome to not consent to webcast. On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:41 PM, William Denton w...@pobox.com wrote: On 26 January 2015, Andreas Orphanides wrote: Not to complicate things: shall (or *how shall*) we accommodate requests from presenters who might have a no photo preference vis-a-vis conference webcast? A few years ago a speaker didn't want to be filmed, and someone turned off the camera and put a paper bag over it for the duration. Bill -- William Denton ↔ Toronto, Canada ↔ https://www.miskatonic.org/ -- Tara Robertson Accessibility Librarian, CAPER-BC http://caperbc.ca/ T 604.323.5254 F 604.323.5954 trobert...@langara.bc.ca mailto:tara%20robertson%20%3ctrobert...@langara.bc.ca%3E Langara. http://www.langara.bc.ca 100 West 49th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Y 2Z6
Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy
Sounds like we've got an established practice in place, then. Awesome. Wouldn't hurt for us to clarify any policy we decide on to state that presenters are welcome to not consent to webcast. On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:41 PM, William Denton w...@pobox.com wrote: On 26 January 2015, Andreas Orphanides wrote: Not to complicate things: shall (or *how shall*) we accommodate requests from presenters who might have a no photo preference vis-a-vis conference webcast? A few years ago a speaker didn't want to be filmed, and someone turned off the camera and put a paper bag over it for the duration. Bill -- William Denton ↔ Toronto, Canada ↔ https://www.miskatonic.org/
Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy
We would definitely want to both give notice to the presenters that the plan is to record and to get consent (or dissent) ahead of time, so that we can plan AV appropriately if someone does not want to be broadcast. It would be awful to broadcast someone who didn't consent to it; nor would we want to have to disrupt things in progress to adjust for an unexpected dissent that should/could have been expected. On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Tara Robertson trobert...@langara.bc.ca wrote: I love this conversation. WRT presenters, I think it's good to be explicit that the plan is to stream and record. It would be good practice to have presenters sign a consent form agreeing to this. Tara On 26/01/2015 10:42 AM, Andreas Orphanides wrote: Sounds like we've got an established practice in place, then. Awesome. Wouldn't hurt for us to clarify any policy we decide on to state that presenters are welcome to not consent to webcast. On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:41 PM, William Denton w...@pobox.com wrote: On 26 January 2015, Andreas Orphanides wrote: Not to complicate things: shall (or *how shall*) we accommodate requests from presenters who might have a no photo preference vis-a-vis conference webcast? A few years ago a speaker didn't want to be filmed, and someone turned off the camera and put a paper bag over it for the duration. Bill -- William Denton ↔ Toronto, Canada ↔ https://www.miskatonic.org/ -- Tara Robertson Accessibility Librarian, CAPER-BC http://caperbc.ca/ T 604.323.5254 F 604.323.5954 trobert...@langara.bc.ca mailto:Tara%20Robertson%20% 3ctrobert...@langara.bc.ca%3E Langara. http://www.langara.bc.ca 100 West 49th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Y 2Z6
Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy
Hi, On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Tom Johnson johnson.tom+code4...@gmail.com wrote: Maybe someone can help us nail down a good policy and approach for communicating it? For folks' consideration, here is a draft of the policy, which is based on the Evergreen and AdaCamp policies and adapted to C4L's needs and the feedback so far in this thread: https://gist.github.com/gmcharlt/8546dcb0ce2af580a476 Regards, Galen -- Galen Charlton Manager of Implementation Equinox Software, Inc. / The Open Source Experts email: g...@esilibrary.com direct: +1 770-709-5581 cell: +1 404-984-4366 skype: gmcharlt web:http://www.esilibrary.com/ Supporting Koha and Evergreen: http://koha-community.org http://evergreen-ils.org
Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy
I love this conversation. WRT presenters, I think it's good to be explicit that the plan is to stream and record. It would be good practice to have presenters sign a consent form agreeing to this. Tara On 26/01/2015 10:42 AM, Andreas Orphanides wrote: Sounds like we've got an established practice in place, then. Awesome. Wouldn't hurt for us to clarify any policy we decide on to state that presenters are welcome to not consent to webcast. On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:41 PM, William Denton w...@pobox.com wrote: On 26 January 2015, Andreas Orphanides wrote: Not to complicate things: shall (or *how shall*) we accommodate requests from presenters who might have a no photo preference vis-a-vis conference webcast? A few years ago a speaker didn't want to be filmed, and someone turned off the camera and put a paper bag over it for the duration. Bill -- William Denton ↔ Toronto, Canada ↔ https://www.miskatonic.org/ -- Tara Robertson Accessibility Librarian, CAPER-BC http://caperbc.ca/ T 604.323.5254 F 604.323.5954 trobert...@langara.bc.ca mailto:tara%20robertson%20%3ctrobert...@langara.bc.ca%3E Langara. http://www.langara.bc.ca 100 West 49th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Y 2Z6
Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy
host_committee++ Re: policy, it seems like the AdaCamp policies are a good match to follow (e.g. http://montreal.adacamp.org/policies/#photo). It appears Evergreen has a policy based on AdaCamp's policy, with more detailed guidelines: http://evergreen-ils.org/conference/photography-policy/ Mark On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Tom Johnson johnson.tom+code4...@gmail.com wrote: This conversation moved fast! The host committee is purchasing colored lanyards (red, yellow, green) which can be used as photography consent indicators. Maybe someone can help us nail down a good policy and approach for communicating it? - Tom On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Sarah Shealy sarah.she...@outlook.com wrote: I see your point, nothing is 100% effective. Especially anywhere more than 4 or 5 people gather. I would think the first year of implementation would be more of a 'let everyone know' type deal. And the MC can also point out any changes in policy (not just this one) during breaks. However, with the lanyards/whatnot, the instances of unwanted photographs should go down. If you don't wear a badge/lanyard/etc you won't really have to worry about it. I'd suggest we have an addition to the policy that basically reads We understand that many people will not know about this policy, and on a first incident someone taking an unwanted photograph is told about the policy. Afterwards, the case(s) will be handled as determined by x. There should also be a part that says If the lanyard/badge/whatnot is not clearly visible, the picture taker should be informed of the issue and remove the image from the phone/camera. No one can control what happens to participants outside of the venue, unfortunately, but hopefully other Code4Libbers would still abide by the policy. This isn't meant to restrict your freedom or get people in trouble. It's to protect those who feel they need protection. I wouldn't use a lanyard/badge/whatnot personally (if voluntary - if you have to choose a color on registration, obviously I would), but I'm not going to make others feel as though they're in the wrong for choosing to do it. Did all of that make sense? Sarah Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 08:52:18 -0800 From: kyle.baner...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 6:58 AM, Galen Charlton g...@esilibrary.com wrote: I would like to propose that C4L adopt a policy requiring that consent be explicitly given to be photographed or recorded, along the lines of a policy adopted by the Evergreen Project. [1] As a practical matter, this is functionally equivalent to prohibiting photography except for arranged photos which will need something simple (like pictures of cameras and mikes with slashes through them posted throughout the venue) to communicate the policy. Differential badges, lanyards, etc will not always be visible, and not all people will notice them, be aware of what they mean, or can be assumed to be familiar with a written policy. On an aside note, a lot of activity occurs outside the official venues and it is in these areas where people might be most vulnerable to unwanted photos. kyle
Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy
Hi, On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Tom Johnson johnson.tom+code4...@gmail.com wrote: Maybe someone can help us nail down a good policy and approach for communicating it? Besides putting the final version of the policy on the conference website, I think mentioning it (and for that matter, the general code of conduct) during the announcements and housekeeping periods each morning would be a good way to do it. For next year, it could be included on the registration website, and if the conference does speaker agreements, they could include an opt-in for photography and recording. Regards, Galen -- Galen Charlton Manager of Implementation Equinox Software, Inc. / The Open Source Experts email: g...@esilibrary.com direct: +1 770-709-5581 cell: +1 404-984-4366 skype: gmcharlt web:http://www.esilibrary.com/ Supporting Koha and Evergreen: http://koha-community.org http://evergreen-ils.org
Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy
This conversation moved fast! The host committee is purchasing colored lanyards (red, yellow, green) which can be used as photography consent indicators. Maybe someone can help us nail down a good policy and approach for communicating it? - Tom On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Sarah Shealy sarah.she...@outlook.com wrote: I see your point, nothing is 100% effective. Especially anywhere more than 4 or 5 people gather. I would think the first year of implementation would be more of a 'let everyone know' type deal. And the MC can also point out any changes in policy (not just this one) during breaks. However, with the lanyards/whatnot, the instances of unwanted photographs should go down. If you don't wear a badge/lanyard/etc you won't really have to worry about it. I'd suggest we have an addition to the policy that basically reads We understand that many people will not know about this policy, and on a first incident someone taking an unwanted photograph is told about the policy. Afterwards, the case(s) will be handled as determined by x. There should also be a part that says If the lanyard/badge/whatnot is not clearly visible, the picture taker should be informed of the issue and remove the image from the phone/camera. No one can control what happens to participants outside of the venue, unfortunately, but hopefully other Code4Libbers would still abide by the policy. This isn't meant to restrict your freedom or get people in trouble. It's to protect those who feel they need protection. I wouldn't use a lanyard/badge/whatnot personally (if voluntary - if you have to choose a color on registration, obviously I would), but I'm not going to make others feel as though they're in the wrong for choosing to do it. Did all of that make sense? Sarah Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 08:52:18 -0800 From: kyle.baner...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 6:58 AM, Galen Charlton g...@esilibrary.com wrote: I would like to propose that C4L adopt a policy requiring that consent be explicitly given to be photographed or recorded, along the lines of a policy adopted by the Evergreen Project. [1] As a practical matter, this is functionally equivalent to prohibiting photography except for arranged photos which will need something simple (like pictures of cameras and mikes with slashes through them posted throughout the venue) to communicate the policy. Differential badges, lanyards, etc will not always be visible, and not all people will notice them, be aware of what they mean, or can be assumed to be familiar with a written policy. On an aside note, a lot of activity occurs outside the official venues and it is in these areas where people might be most vulnerable to unwanted photos. kyle
Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 6:58 AM, Galen Charlton g...@esilibrary.com wrote: I would like to propose that C4L adopt a policy requiring that consent be explicitly given to be photographed or recorded, along the lines of a policy adopted by the Evergreen Project. [1] As a practical matter, this is functionally equivalent to prohibiting photography except for arranged photos which will need something simple (like pictures of cameras and mikes with slashes through them posted throughout the venue) to communicate the policy. Differential badges, lanyards, etc will not always be visible, and not all people will notice them, be aware of what they mean, or can be assumed to be familiar with a written policy. On an aside note, a lot of activity occurs outside the official venues and it is in these areas where people might be most vulnerable to unwanted photos. kyle
Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy
I see your point, nothing is 100% effective. Especially anywhere more than 4 or 5 people gather. I would think the first year of implementation would be more of a 'let everyone know' type deal. And the MC can also point out any changes in policy (not just this one) during breaks. However, with the lanyards/whatnot, the instances of unwanted photographs should go down. If you don't wear a badge/lanyard/etc you won't really have to worry about it. I'd suggest we have an addition to the policy that basically reads We understand that many people will not know about this policy, and on a first incident someone taking an unwanted photograph is told about the policy. Afterwards, the case(s) will be handled as determined by x. There should also be a part that says If the lanyard/badge/whatnot is not clearly visible, the picture taker should be informed of the issue and remove the image from the phone/camera. No one can control what happens to participants outside of the venue, unfortunately, but hopefully other Code4Libbers would still abide by the policy. This isn't meant to restrict your freedom or get people in trouble. It's to protect those who feel they need protection. I wouldn't use a lanyard/badge/whatnot personally (if voluntary - if you have to choose a color on registration, obviously I would), but I'm not going to make others feel as though they're in the wrong for choosing to do it. Did all of that make sense? Sarah Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 08:52:18 -0800 From: kyle.baner...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 6:58 AM, Galen Charlton g...@esilibrary.com wrote: I would like to propose that C4L adopt a policy requiring that consent be explicitly given to be photographed or recorded, along the lines of a policy adopted by the Evergreen Project. [1] As a practical matter, this is functionally equivalent to prohibiting photography except for arranged photos which will need something simple (like pictures of cameras and mikes with slashes through them posted throughout the venue) to communicate the policy. Differential badges, lanyards, etc will not always be visible, and not all people will notice them, be aware of what they mean, or can be assumed to be familiar with a written policy. On an aside note, a lot of activity occurs outside the official venues and it is in these areas where people might be most vulnerable to unwanted photos. kyle
Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy
In order to keep some presenters from being streamed and others not would require the presentation line up (including whether ALL of the presenters who are included on an individual presentation) to be made available to the filming crew in advance, for that line up not to change (for example, to run behind schedule), it would require quite a bit of babysitting of the piece of paper to make sure it was to hand at the time it's needed... I'm sure there's more that I don't know. Because the broadcast is live, it's really NOT as simple as sticking up a piece of paper when someone comes on who doesn't want to be filmed because ONCE you've inadvertently filmed someone the cat is out of the bag - their image is out there for the world to see - it requires a bit of planning and thought (as I imagine) before the person is standing there getting filmed. Cary and Riley (others) film C4L for fun and for free and may () want to actually do stuff other than juggling pieces of paper (like take a restroom break, perhaps?). I believe Cary's and Riley's assessment that this is burdensome cos I can just imagine how this would be if *I* had to do it. Both have way more experience with this than me (er... I have none), but still, as I understand it, this is more than they feel comfortable taking on. (Haven't you watched them - they actually DO bring some production values to this, too.) Christina Salazar Systems Librarian John Spoor Broome Library California State University, Channel Islands 805/437-3198 -Original Message- From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Sarah Shealy Sent: Monday, January 26, 2015 12:07 PM To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy What more would be required than just putting a sheet of paper in front of the lens while filming? Honestly curious. Sarah Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 12:00:05 -0800 From: listu...@chillco.com Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU I think that requiring explicit permission from presenters is overly burdensome for the crew that is struggling to get the recordings up. I think that speakers and presenters should be informed that all presentations may be recorded and made available to the public unless they inform the conference committee that they do not want to be recorded before their presentation begins. If they object, the video crew will refrain from capturing their presentation. If we do screen capture again, it is possible that presenter could have the option of allowing us to record their voice and screen. Cary On Jan 26, 2015, at 10:58 AM, Andreas Orphanides akorp...@ncsu.edu wrote: We would definitely want to both give notice to the presenters that the plan is to record and to get consent (or dissent) ahead of time, so that we can plan AV appropriately if someone does not want to be broadcast. It would be awful to broadcast someone who didn't consent to it; nor would we want to have to disrupt things in progress to adjust for an unexpected dissent that should/could have been expected. On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Tara Robertson trobert...@langara.bc.ca wrote: I love this conversation. WRT presenters, I think it's good to be explicit that the plan is to stream and record. It would be good practice to have presenters sign a consent form agreeing to this. Tara On 26/01/2015 10:42 AM, Andreas Orphanides wrote: Sounds like we've got an established practice in place, then. Awesome. Wouldn't hurt for us to clarify any policy we decide on to state that presenters are welcome to not consent to webcast. On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:41 PM, William Denton w...@pobox.com wrote: On 26 January 2015, Andreas Orphanides wrote: Not to complicate things: shall (or *how shall*) we accommodate requests from presenters who might have a no photo preference vis-a-vis conference webcast? A few years ago a speaker didn't want to be filmed, and someone turned off the camera and put a paper bag over it for the duration. Bill -- William Denton ↔ Toronto, Canada ↔ https://www.miskatonic.org/ -- Tara Robertson Accessibility Librarian, CAPER-BC http://caperbc.ca/ T 604.323.5254 F 604.323.5954 trobert...@langara.bc.ca mailto:Tara%20Robertson%20% 3ctrobert...@langara.bc.ca%3E Langara. http://www.langara.bc.ca 100 West 49th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Y 2Z6
Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy
I will not be there this year (coincided with a scholarship opportunity) , but I think the best option may be to establish a time frame where the conf will not be streamed (eg day 2 afternoon) that way we can say this group of presenters will not be filmed. //Riley Sent from my Windows Phone -- Riley Childs Senior Charlotte United Christian Academy Library Services Administrator IT Services Administrator (704) 537-0331x101 (704) 497-2086 rileychilds.net @rowdychildren I use Lync (select External Contact on any XMPP chat client) CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and any files transmitted with it are the property of Charlotte United Christian Academy. This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain confidential information that is privileged and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not one of the named original recipients or have received this e-mail in error, please permanently delete the original and any copy of any e-mail and any printout thereof. Thank you for your compliance. This email is also subject to copyright. No part of it nor any attachments may be reproduced, adapted, forwarded or transmitted without the written consent of the copyright ow...@cucawarriors.com From: Salazar, Christinamailto:christina.sala...@csuci.edu Sent: 1/26/2015 4:44 PM To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDUmailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy In order to keep some presenters from being streamed and others not would require the presentation line up (including whether ALL of the presenters who are included on an individual presentation) to be made available to the filming crew in advance, for that line up not to change (for example, to run behind schedule), it would require quite a bit of babysitting of the piece of paper to make sure it was to hand at the time it's needed... I'm sure there's more that I don't know. Because the broadcast is live, it's really NOT as simple as sticking up a piece of paper when someone comes on who doesn't want to be filmed because ONCE you've inadvertently filmed someone the cat is out of the bag - their image is out there for the world to see - it requires a bit of planning and thought (as I imagine) before the person is standing there getting filmed. Cary and Riley (others) film C4L for fun and for free and may () want to actually do stuff other than juggling pieces of paper (like take a restroom break, perhaps?). I believe Cary's and Riley's assessment that this is burdensome cos I can just imagine how this would be if *I* had to do it. Both have way more experience with this than me (er... I have none), but still, as I understand it, this is more than they feel comfortable taking on. (Haven't you watched them - they actually DO bring some production values to this, too.) Christina Salazar Systems Librarian John Spoor Broome Library California State University, Channel Islands 805/437-3198 -Original Message- From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Sarah Shealy Sent: Monday, January 26, 2015 12:07 PM To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy What more would be required than just putting a sheet of paper in front of the lens while filming? Honestly curious. Sarah Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 12:00:05 -0800 From: listu...@chillco.com Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU I think that requiring explicit permission from presenters is overly burdensome for the crew that is struggling to get the recordings up. I think that speakers and presenters should be informed that all presentations may be recorded and made available to the public unless they inform the conference committee that they do not want to be recorded before their presentation begins. If they object, the video crew will refrain from capturing their presentation. If we do screen capture again, it is possible that presenter could have the option of allowing us to record their voice and screen. Cary On Jan 26, 2015, at 10:58 AM, Andreas Orphanides akorp...@ncsu.edu wrote: We would definitely want to both give notice to the presenters that the plan is to record and to get consent (or dissent) ahead of time, so that we can plan AV appropriately if someone does not want to be broadcast. It would be awful to broadcast someone who didn't consent to it; nor would we want to have to disrupt things in progress to adjust for an unexpected dissent that should/could have been expected. On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Tara Robertson trobert...@langara.bc.ca wrote: I love this conversation. WRT presenters, I think it's good to be explicit that the plan is to stream and record. It would be good practice to have presenters sign a consent form agreeing
Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy
I never said I didn't believe them - I asked a question. I don't have any experience with this and was asking for more information. No need to go on the defensive. Also, Tara has agreed to take over that responsibility, so no is forcing Cary/Riley to do anything they're uncomfortable with. Sarah Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 21:43:45 + From: christina.sala...@csuci.edu Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU In order to keep some presenters from being streamed and others not would require the presentation line up (including whether ALL of the presenters who are included on an individual presentation) to be made available to the filming crew in advance, for that line up not to change (for example, to run behind schedule), it would require quite a bit of babysitting of the piece of paper to make sure it was to hand at the time it's needed... I'm sure there's more that I don't know. Because the broadcast is live, it's really NOT as simple as sticking up a piece of paper when someone comes on who doesn't want to be filmed because ONCE you've inadvertently filmed someone the cat is out of the bag - their image is out there for the world to see - it requires a bit of planning and thought (as I imagine) before the person is standing there getting filmed. Cary and Riley (others) film C4L for fun and for free and may () want to actually do stuff other than juggling pieces of paper (like take a restroom break, perhaps?). I believe Cary's and Riley's assessment that this is burdensome cos I can just imagine how this would be if *I* had to do it. Both have way more experience with this than me (er... I have none), but still, as I understand it, this is more than they feel comfortable taking on. (Haven't you watched them - they actually DO bring some production values to this, too.) Christina Salazar Systems Librarian John Spoor Broome Library California State University, Channel Islands 805/437-3198 -Original Message- From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Sarah Shealy Sent: Monday, January 26, 2015 12:07 PM To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy What more would be required than just putting a sheet of paper in front of the lens while filming? Honestly curious. Sarah Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 12:00:05 -0800 From: listu...@chillco.com Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU I think that requiring explicit permission from presenters is overly burdensome for the crew that is struggling to get the recordings up. I think that speakers and presenters should be informed that all presentations may be recorded and made available to the public unless they inform the conference committee that they do not want to be recorded before their presentation begins. If they object, the video crew will refrain from capturing their presentation. If we do screen capture again, it is possible that presenter could have the option of allowing us to record their voice and screen. Cary On Jan 26, 2015, at 10:58 AM, Andreas Orphanides akorp...@ncsu.edu wrote: We would definitely want to both give notice to the presenters that the plan is to record and to get consent (or dissent) ahead of time, so that we can plan AV appropriately if someone does not want to be broadcast. It would be awful to broadcast someone who didn't consent to it; nor would we want to have to disrupt things in progress to adjust for an unexpected dissent that should/could have been expected. On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Tara Robertson trobert...@langara.bc.ca wrote: I love this conversation. WRT presenters, I think it's good to be explicit that the plan is to stream and record. It would be good practice to have presenters sign a consent form agreeing to this. Tara On 26/01/2015 10:42 AM, Andreas Orphanides wrote: Sounds like we've got an established practice in place, then. Awesome. Wouldn't hurt for us to clarify any policy we decide on to state that presenters are welcome to not consent to webcast. On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:41 PM, William Denton w...@pobox.com wrote: On 26 January 2015, Andreas Orphanides wrote: Not to complicate things: shall (or *how shall*) we accommodate requests from presenters who might have a no photo preference vis-a-vis conference webcast? A few years ago a speaker didn't want to be filmed, and someone turned off the camera and put a paper bag over it for the duration. Bill -- William Denton ↔ Toronto, Canada ↔ https://www.miskatonic.org/ -- Tara Robertson Accessibility Librarian, CAPER-BC http://caperbc.ca/ T 604.323.5254 F
Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy
If it's too burdensome for the livestream crew, I'd be happy to volunteer to work with the program committee and streaming committee to make it happen. I'd be willing to adapt the plain English consent sheet we used for Access and the International Evergreen conference. I think it's important for communication to be clear about where the video will be streamed and archived. As a presenter I'm definately more mindful about what I'm saying if I know it's going to be published to the web. I think informed consent is important. Tara On 26/01/2015 12:00 PM, Cary Gordon wrote: I think that requiring explicit permission from presenters is overly burdensome for the crew that is struggling to get the recordings up. I think that speakers and presenters should be informed that all presentations may be recorded and made available to the public unless they inform the conference committee that they do not want to be recorded before their presentation begins. If they object, the video crew will refrain from capturing their presentation. If we do screen capture again, it is possible that presenter could have the option of allowing us to record their voice and screen. Cary On Jan 26, 2015, at 10:58 AM, Andreas Orphanides akorp...@ncsu.edu wrote: We would definitely want to both give notice to the presenters that the plan is to record and to get consent (or dissent) ahead of time, so that we can plan AV appropriately if someone does not want to be broadcast. It would be awful to broadcast someone who didn't consent to it; nor would we want to have to disrupt things in progress to adjust for an unexpected dissent that should/could have been expected. On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Tara Robertson trobert...@langara.bc.ca wrote: I love this conversation. WRT presenters, I think it's good to be explicit that the plan is to stream and record. It would be good practice to have presenters sign a consent form agreeing to this. Tara On 26/01/2015 10:42 AM, Andreas Orphanides wrote: Sounds like we've got an established practice in place, then. Awesome. Wouldn't hurt for us to clarify any policy we decide on to state that presenters are welcome to not consent to webcast. On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:41 PM, William Denton w...@pobox.com wrote: On 26 January 2015, Andreas Orphanides wrote: Not to complicate things: shall (or *how shall*) we accommodate requests from presenters who might have a no photo preference vis-a-vis conference webcast? A few years ago a speaker didn't want to be filmed, and someone turned off the camera and put a paper bag over it for the duration. Bill -- William Denton ↔ Toronto, Canada ↔ https://www.miskatonic.org/ -- Tara Robertson Accessibility Librarian, CAPER-BC http://caperbc.ca/ T 604.323.5254 F 604.323.5954 trobert...@langara.bc.ca mailto:Tara%20Robertson%20% 3ctrobert...@langara.bc.ca%3E Langara. http://www.langara.bc.ca 100 West 49th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Y 2Z6 -- Tara Robertson Accessibility Librarian, CAPER-BC http://caperbc.ca/ T 604.323.5254 F 604.323.5954 trobert...@langara.bc.ca mailto:tara%20robertson%20%3ctrobert...@langara.bc.ca%3E Langara. http://www.langara.bc.ca 100 West 49th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Y 2Z6
Re: [CODE4LIB] Code4LibCon video (Was: Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy)
A streaming rotation might be an idea, it would be nice to have a morning crew/afternoon crew. -- Riley Childs Senior IT Manager Library Services Administrator Charlotte United Christian Academy office: +1 (704) 537-0331 x101 mobile: +1 (704) 497-2086 web: rileychilds.net twitter: @RowdyChildren Checkout our new Online Library Catalog: catalog.cucawarriors.com From: Code for Libraries CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU on behalf of Cary Gordon listu...@chillco.com Sent: Monday, January 26, 2015 7:38 PM To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Code4LibCon video (Was: Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy) Correction: We need a Mac, as my encoder is Thunderbolt. I will try to rebuild my MacBook Pro, if I gat a chance. On Jan 26, 2015, at 4:36 PM, Cary Gordon listu...@chillco.com wrote: Just to be clear, I am providing equipment and will set it up, but I do not believe that we have a streaming crew at this time. Riley and I spent almost every moment of the last Con doing this, so while I am willing to teach and help, I am not going to be the video guy again. We also need a decent computer. I am most familiar with Macs, but a PC will do. Linux is not an option. Thanks, Cary On Jan 26, 2015, at 4:26 PM, Ranti Junus ranti.ju...@gmail.com mailto:ranti.ju...@gmail.com wrote: I agree that streaming crew should be free from doing the paperwork. Tara has volunteered to be the paperwork person and I'm volunteering to help her out. I think streaming crew, Tara, and I can discuss separately on things that are need to be done or information we should provide (e.g. list of those who opt-out, their talk schedule, etc.) to the streaming crew. thanks, ranti. On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 7:07 PM, Cary Gordon listu...@chillco.com mailto:listu...@chillco.com wrote: To be clear, what I said or tried to say is that the streaming crew needs to know if he presenter does not wish to be shown, or if they do not want their presentation shown before they start presenting. At least one full minute before would be great. They can take our word that we will honor their wishes. I think that it is fair to say that nobody involved with the video wants anything to do with paperwork, and if anyone has the time and energy to do that, their time would be better spent actually working on the video crew, which at this point is virtually nonexistent. Every presenter should know that we will be putting up video of their session or talk on our YouTube channel with a CC license, unless they demure. We should have a small sign to that effect at the podium, as well. -- Cary Gordon The Cherry Hill Company http://chillco.com http://chillco.com/ -- Bulk mail. Postage paid.
Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy
Thank you, Tara and Ranti for taking this on. I'm sure even many speakers who have no problem being filmed will appreciate being notified and given the opportunity to opt in/out. - Tom On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Ranti Junus ranti.ju...@gmail.com wrote: I agree that streaming crew should be free from doing the paperwork. Tara has volunteered to be the paperwork person and I'm volunteering to help her out. I think streaming crew, Tara, and I can discuss separately on things that are need to be done or information we should provide (e.g. list of those who opt-out, their talk schedule, etc.) to the streaming crew. thanks, ranti. On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 7:07 PM, Cary Gordon listu...@chillco.com wrote: To be clear, what I said or tried to say is that the streaming crew needs to know if he presenter does not wish to be shown, or if they do not want their presentation shown before they start presenting. At least one full minute before would be great. They can take our word that we will honor their wishes. I think that it is fair to say that nobody involved with the video wants anything to do with paperwork, and if anyone has the time and energy to do that, their time would be better spent actually working on the video crew, which at this point is virtually nonexistent. Every presenter should know that we will be putting up video of their session or talk on our YouTube channel with a CC license, unless they demure. We should have a small sign to that effect at the podium, as well. -- Cary Gordon The Cherry Hill Company http://chillco.com -- Bulk mail. Postage paid.
Re: [CODE4LIB] Code4LibCon video (Was: Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy)
I can supply a Macbook. Thanks Cary, for your offer to bring equipment. My hope is that someone will step forward to coordinate the stream; it should be something that we can bring volunteers on board for if we can arrange for a morning/handoff/afternoon cycle, rather than a multi-day commitment. - Tom On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Cary Gordon listu...@chillco.com wrote: Correction: We need a Mac, as my encoder is Thunderbolt. I will try to rebuild my MacBook Pro, if I gat a chance. On Jan 26, 2015, at 4:36 PM, Cary Gordon listu...@chillco.com wrote: Just to be clear, I am providing equipment and will set it up, but I do not believe that we have a streaming crew at this time. Riley and I spent almost every moment of the last Con doing this, so while I am willing to teach and help, I am not going to be the video guy again. We also need a decent computer. I am most familiar with Macs, but a PC will do. Linux is not an option. Thanks, Cary On Jan 26, 2015, at 4:26 PM, Ranti Junus ranti.ju...@gmail.com mailto:ranti.ju...@gmail.com wrote: I agree that streaming crew should be free from doing the paperwork. Tara has volunteered to be the paperwork person and I'm volunteering to help her out. I think streaming crew, Tara, and I can discuss separately on things that are need to be done or information we should provide (e.g. list of those who opt-out, their talk schedule, etc.) to the streaming crew. thanks, ranti. On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 7:07 PM, Cary Gordon listu...@chillco.com mailto:listu...@chillco.com wrote: To be clear, what I said or tried to say is that the streaming crew needs to know if he presenter does not wish to be shown, or if they do not want their presentation shown before they start presenting. At least one full minute before would be great. They can take our word that we will honor their wishes. I think that it is fair to say that nobody involved with the video wants anything to do with paperwork, and if anyone has the time and energy to do that, their time would be better spent actually working on the video crew, which at this point is virtually nonexistent. Every presenter should know that we will be putting up video of their session or talk on our YouTube channel with a CC license, unless they demure. We should have a small sign to that effect at the podium, as well. -- Cary Gordon The Cherry Hill Company http://chillco.com http://chillco.com/ -- Bulk mail. Postage paid.
Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy
I think it is pretty straightforward. [] I am ok with my image, audio, and presentation being broadcast and archived (default) [] I am not ok with my image being brodcasted, but will allow audio and slides [] none of the above This needs to be opt out, not opt in. We are beating a dead horse at this point and complicating matters. //Riley Sent from my Windows Phone -- Riley Childs Senior Charlotte United Christian Academy Library Services Administrator IT Services Administrator (704) 537-0331x101 (704) 497-2086 rileychilds.net @rowdychildren I use Lync (select External Contact on any XMPP chat client) CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and any files transmitted with it are the property of Charlotte United Christian Academy. This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain confidential information that is privileged and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not one of the named original recipients or have received this e-mail in error, please permanently delete the original and any copy of any e-mail and any printout thereof. Thank you for your compliance. This email is also subject to copyright. No part of it nor any attachments may be reproduced, adapted, forwarded or transmitted without the written consent of the copyright ow...@cucawarriors.com From: Tara Robertsonmailto:trobert...@langara.bc.ca Sent: 1/26/2015 9:34 PM To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDUmailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy I don't imagine that many, if any, people will opt out. But I think the process is important: How do you say yes when you don't know what you're agreeing to? And how do you know if you have the option to opt out, unless asked? Thanks everyone, Tara On 2015-01-26, 5:17 PM, Tom Johnson wrote: Thank you, Tara and Ranti for taking this on. I'm sure even many speakers who have no problem being filmed will appreciate being notified and given the opportunity to opt in/out. - Tom On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Ranti Junus ranti.ju...@gmail.com wrote: I agree that streaming crew should be free from doing the paperwork. Tara has volunteered to be the paperwork person and I'm volunteering to help her out. I think streaming crew, Tara, and I can discuss separately on things that are need to be done or information we should provide (e.g. list of those who opt-out, their talk schedule, etc.) to the streaming crew. thanks, ranti. On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 7:07 PM, Cary Gordon listu...@chillco.com wrote: To be clear, what I said or tried to say is that the streaming crew needs to know if he presenter does not wish to be shown, or if they do not want their presentation shown before they start presenting. At least one full minute before would be great. They can take our word that we will honor their wishes. I think that it is fair to say that nobody involved with the video wants anything to do with paperwork, and if anyone has the time and energy to do that, their time would be better spent actually working on the video crew, which at this point is virtually nonexistent. Every presenter should know that we will be putting up video of their session or talk on our YouTube channel with a CC license, unless they demure. We should have a small sign to that effect at the podium, as well. -- Cary Gordon The Cherry Hill Company http://chillco.com -- Bulk mail. Postage paid.
Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy
I don't imagine that many, if any, people will opt out. But I think the process is important: How do you say yes when you don't know what you're agreeing to? And how do you know if you have the option to opt out, unless asked? Thanks everyone, Tara On 2015-01-26, 5:17 PM, Tom Johnson wrote: Thank you, Tara and Ranti for taking this on. I'm sure even many speakers who have no problem being filmed will appreciate being notified and given the opportunity to opt in/out. - Tom On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Ranti Junus ranti.ju...@gmail.com wrote: I agree that streaming crew should be free from doing the paperwork. Tara has volunteered to be the paperwork person and I'm volunteering to help her out. I think streaming crew, Tara, and I can discuss separately on things that are need to be done or information we should provide (e.g. list of those who opt-out, their talk schedule, etc.) to the streaming crew. thanks, ranti. On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 7:07 PM, Cary Gordon listu...@chillco.com wrote: To be clear, what I said or tried to say is that the streaming crew needs to know if he presenter does not wish to be shown, or if they do not want their presentation shown before they start presenting. At least one full minute before would be great. They can take our word that we will honor their wishes. I think that it is fair to say that nobody involved with the video wants anything to do with paperwork, and if anyone has the time and energy to do that, their time would be better spent actually working on the video crew, which at this point is virtually nonexistent. Every presenter should know that we will be putting up video of their session or talk on our YouTube channel with a CC license, unless they demure. We should have a small sign to that effect at the podium, as well. -- Cary Gordon The Cherry Hill Company http://chillco.com -- Bulk mail. Postage paid.
Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy
To be clear, what I said or tried to say is that the streaming crew needs to know if he presenter does not wish to be shown, or if they do not want their presentation shown before they start presenting. At least one full minute before would be great. They can take our word that we will honor their wishes. I think that it is fair to say that nobody involved with the video wants anything to do with paperwork, and if anyone has the time and energy to do that, their time would be better spent actually working on the video crew, which at this point is virtually nonexistent. Every presenter should know that we will be putting up video of their session or talk on our YouTube channel with a CC license, unless they demure. We should have a small sign to that effect at the podium, as well. On Monday, January 26, 2015, Schwartz, Raymond schwart...@wpunj.edu wrote: I would agree with Cary. An Opt-Out policy would be more workable for presenters. As you all know, I have been taking many photos over the years at this conference (see the 6 albums from 2008 to 2013 at https://www.flickr.com/photos/schwartzray/collections/72157604027074852/https://www.flickr.com/photos/schwartzray/collections/72157604027074852/). Though I still take candid photos, (BTW Andromeda has ask to use this one for her keynote https://www.flickr.com/photos/schwartzray/4393750460/in/set-72157623395853351https://www.flickr.com/photos/schwartzray/4393750460/in/set-72157623395853351), generally these days I take candids of people I am somewhat 'acquainted' with. Only on two occasions I do recall that the person photographed later asked to delete/or not take the pic-which of course I did. For photographers, color coded lanyards would be easier to spot. And if any were accidentally caught in a frame, it could be deleted or the portion blacked out. /Ray From: Code for Libraries [CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU javascript:;] on behalf of Cary Gordon [listu...@chillco.com javascript:;] Sent: Monday, January 26, 2015 3:00 PM To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU javascript:; Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy I think that requiring explicit permission from presenters is overly burdensome for the crew that is struggling to get the recordings up. I think that speakers and presenters should be informed that all presentations may be recorded and made available to the public unless they inform the conference committee that they do not want to be recorded before their presentation begins. If they object, the video crew will refrain from capturing their presentation. If we do screen capture again, it is possible that presenter could have the option of allowing us to record their voice and screen. Cary On Jan 26, 2015, at 10:58 AM, Andreas Orphanides akorp...@ncsu.edu javascript:; wrote: We would definitely want to both give notice to the presenters that the plan is to record and to get consent (or dissent) ahead of time, so that we can plan AV appropriately if someone does not want to be broadcast. It would be awful to broadcast someone who didn't consent to it; nor would we want to have to disrupt things in progress to adjust for an unexpected dissent that should/could have been expected. On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Tara Robertson trobert...@langara.bc.ca javascript:; wrote: I love this conversation. WRT presenters, I think it's good to be explicit that the plan is to stream and record. It would be good practice to have presenters sign a consent form agreeing to this. Tara On 26/01/2015 10:42 AM, Andreas Orphanides wrote: Sounds like we've got an established practice in place, then. Awesome. Wouldn't hurt for us to clarify any policy we decide on to state that presenters are welcome to not consent to webcast. On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:41 PM, William Denton w...@pobox.com javascript:; wrote: On 26 January 2015, Andreas Orphanides wrote: Not to complicate things: shall (or *how shall*) we accommodate requests from presenters who might have a no photo preference vis-a-vis conference webcast? A few years ago a speaker didn't want to be filmed, and someone turned off the camera and put a paper bag over it for the duration. Bill -- William Denton ↔ Toronto, Canada ↔ https://www.miskatonic.org/ -- Tara Robertson Accessibility Librarian, CAPER-BC http://caperbc.ca/ T 604.323.5254 F 604.323.5954 trobert...@langara.bc.ca javascript:; mailto:Tara%20Robertson%20% javascript:; 3ctrobert...@langara.bc.ca javascript:;%3E Langara. http://www.langara.bc.ca 100 West 49th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Y 2Z6 -- Cary Gordon The Cherry Hill Company http://chillco.com
Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy
I agree that streaming crew should be free from doing the paperwork. Tara has volunteered to be the paperwork person and I'm volunteering to help her out. I think streaming crew, Tara, and I can discuss separately on things that are need to be done or information we should provide (e.g. list of those who opt-out, their talk schedule, etc.) to the streaming crew. thanks, ranti. On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 7:07 PM, Cary Gordon listu...@chillco.com wrote: To be clear, what I said or tried to say is that the streaming crew needs to know if he presenter does not wish to be shown, or if they do not want their presentation shown before they start presenting. At least one full minute before would be great. They can take our word that we will honor their wishes. I think that it is fair to say that nobody involved with the video wants anything to do with paperwork, and if anyone has the time and energy to do that, their time would be better spent actually working on the video crew, which at this point is virtually nonexistent. Every presenter should know that we will be putting up video of their session or talk on our YouTube channel with a CC license, unless they demure. We should have a small sign to that effect at the podium, as well. -- Cary Gordon The Cherry Hill Company http://chillco.com -- Bulk mail. Postage paid.
[CODE4LIB] Code4LibCon video (Was: Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy)
Just to be clear, I am providing equipment and will set it up, but I do not believe that we have a streaming crew at this time. Riley and I spent almost every moment of the last Con doing this, so while I am willing to teach and help, I am not going to be the video guy again. We also need a decent computer. I am most familiar with Macs, but a PC will do. Linux is not an option. Thanks, Cary On Jan 26, 2015, at 4:26 PM, Ranti Junus ranti.ju...@gmail.com wrote: I agree that streaming crew should be free from doing the paperwork. Tara has volunteered to be the paperwork person and I'm volunteering to help her out. I think streaming crew, Tara, and I can discuss separately on things that are need to be done or information we should provide (e.g. list of those who opt-out, their talk schedule, etc.) to the streaming crew. thanks, ranti. On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 7:07 PM, Cary Gordon listu...@chillco.com mailto:listu...@chillco.com wrote: To be clear, what I said or tried to say is that the streaming crew needs to know if he presenter does not wish to be shown, or if they do not want their presentation shown before they start presenting. At least one full minute before would be great. They can take our word that we will honor their wishes. I think that it is fair to say that nobody involved with the video wants anything to do with paperwork, and if anyone has the time and energy to do that, their time would be better spent actually working on the video crew, which at this point is virtually nonexistent. Every presenter should know that we will be putting up video of their session or talk on our YouTube channel with a CC license, unless they demure. We should have a small sign to that effect at the podium, as well. -- Cary Gordon The Cherry Hill Company http://chillco.com -- Bulk mail. Postage paid.
Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy
I would agree with Cary. An Opt-Out policy would be more workable for presenters. As you all know, I have been taking many photos over the years at this conference (see the 6 albums from 2008 to 2013 at https://www.flickr.com/photos/schwartzray/collections/72157604027074852/https://www.flickr.com/photos/schwartzray/collections/72157604027074852/). Though I still take candid photos, (BTW Andromeda has ask to use this one for her keynote https://www.flickr.com/photos/schwartzray/4393750460/in/set-72157623395853351https://www.flickr.com/photos/schwartzray/4393750460/in/set-72157623395853351), generally these days I take candids of people I am somewhat 'acquainted' with. Only on two occasions I do recall that the person photographed later asked to delete/or not take the pic-which of course I did. For photographers, color coded lanyards would be easier to spot. And if any were accidentally caught in a frame, it could be deleted or the portion blacked out. /Ray From: Code for Libraries [CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] on behalf of Cary Gordon [listu...@chillco.com] Sent: Monday, January 26, 2015 3:00 PM To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy I think that requiring explicit permission from presenters is overly burdensome for the crew that is struggling to get the recordings up. I think that speakers and presenters should be informed that all presentations may be recorded and made available to the public unless they inform the conference committee that they do not want to be recorded before their presentation begins. If they object, the video crew will refrain from capturing their presentation. If we do screen capture again, it is possible that presenter could have the option of allowing us to record their voice and screen. Cary On Jan 26, 2015, at 10:58 AM, Andreas Orphanides akorp...@ncsu.edu wrote: We would definitely want to both give notice to the presenters that the plan is to record and to get consent (or dissent) ahead of time, so that we can plan AV appropriately if someone does not want to be broadcast. It would be awful to broadcast someone who didn't consent to it; nor would we want to have to disrupt things in progress to adjust for an unexpected dissent that should/could have been expected. On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Tara Robertson trobert...@langara.bc.ca wrote: I love this conversation. WRT presenters, I think it's good to be explicit that the plan is to stream and record. It would be good practice to have presenters sign a consent form agreeing to this. Tara On 26/01/2015 10:42 AM, Andreas Orphanides wrote: Sounds like we've got an established practice in place, then. Awesome. Wouldn't hurt for us to clarify any policy we decide on to state that presenters are welcome to not consent to webcast. On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:41 PM, William Denton w...@pobox.com wrote: On 26 January 2015, Andreas Orphanides wrote: Not to complicate things: shall (or *how shall*) we accommodate requests from presenters who might have a no photo preference vis-a-vis conference webcast? A few years ago a speaker didn't want to be filmed, and someone turned off the camera and put a paper bag over it for the duration. Bill -- William Denton ↔ Toronto, Canada ↔ https://www.miskatonic.org/ -- Tara Robertson Accessibility Librarian, CAPER-BC http://caperbc.ca/ T 604.323.5254 F 604.323.5954 trobert...@langara.bc.ca mailto:Tara%20Robertson%20% 3ctrobert...@langara.bc.ca%3E Langara. http://www.langara.bc.ca 100 West 49th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Y 2Z6
Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy
Hi Cary, I appreciate the work you do to make the streaming happen. I'm trying to better understand the burden--what would you need to make this work for you? If you were given the schedule with the names of people who did *not* consent to be streamed highlighted would that work? Cheers, Tara On 26/01/2015 12:00 PM, Cary Gordon wrote: I think that requiring explicit permission from presenters is overly burdensome for the crew that is struggling to get the recordings up. I think that speakers and presenters should be informed that all presentations may be recorded and made available to the public unless they inform the conference committee that they do not want to be recorded before their presentation begins. If they object, the video crew will refrain from capturing their presentation. If we do screen capture again, it is possible that presenter could have the option of allowing us to record their voice and screen. Cary On Jan 26, 2015, at 10:58 AM, Andreas Orphanides akorp...@ncsu.edu wrote: We would definitely want to both give notice to the presenters that the plan is to record and to get consent (or dissent) ahead of time, so that we can plan AV appropriately if someone does not want to be broadcast. It would be awful to broadcast someone who didn't consent to it; nor would we want to have to disrupt things in progress to adjust for an unexpected dissent that should/could have been expected. On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Tara Robertson trobert...@langara.bc.ca wrote: I love this conversation. WRT presenters, I think it's good to be explicit that the plan is to stream and record. It would be good practice to have presenters sign a consent form agreeing to this. Tara On 26/01/2015 10:42 AM, Andreas Orphanides wrote: Sounds like we've got an established practice in place, then. Awesome. Wouldn't hurt for us to clarify any policy we decide on to state that presenters are welcome to not consent to webcast. On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:41 PM, William Denton w...@pobox.com wrote: On 26 January 2015, Andreas Orphanides wrote: Not to complicate things: shall (or *how shall*) we accommodate requests from presenters who might have a no photo preference vis-a-vis conference webcast? A few years ago a speaker didn't want to be filmed, and someone turned off the camera and put a paper bag over it for the duration. Bill -- William Denton ↔ Toronto, Canada ↔ https://www.miskatonic.org/ -- Tara Robertson Accessibility Librarian, CAPER-BC http://caperbc.ca/ T 604.323.5254 F 604.323.5954 trobert...@langara.bc.ca mailto:Tara%20Robertson%20% 3ctrobert...@langara.bc.ca%3E Langara. http://www.langara.bc.ca 100 West 49th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Y 2Z6 -- Tara Robertson Accessibility Librarian, CAPER-BC http://caperbc.ca/ T 604.323.5254 F 604.323.5954 trobert...@langara.bc.ca mailto:tara%20robertson%20%3ctrobert...@langara.bc.ca%3E Langara. http://www.langara.bc.ca 100 West 49th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Y 2Z6
Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy
On 1/26/15 4:43 PM, Salazar, Christina wrote: In order to keep some presenters from being streamed and others not would require the presentation line up (including whether ALL of the presenters who are included on an individual presentation) to be made available to the filming crew in advance, for that line up not to change (for example, to run behind schedule), it would require quite a bit of babysitting of the piece of paper to make sure it was to hand at the time it's needed... I'm sure there's more that I don't know. Because the broadcast is live, it's really NOT as simple as sticking up a piece of paper when someone comes on who doesn't want to be filmed because ONCE you've inadvertently filmed someone the cat is out of the bag - their image is out there for the world to see - it requires a bit of planning and thought (as I imagine) before the person is standing there getting filmed. Cary and Riley (others) film C4L for fun and for free and may () want to actually do stuff other than juggling pieces of paper (like take a restroom break, perhaps?). I believe Cary's and Riley's assessment that this is burdensome cos I can just imagine how this would be if *I* had to do it. Both have way more experience with this than me (er... I have none), but still, as I understand it, this is more than they feel comfortable taking on. (Haven't you watched them - they actually DO bring some production values to this, too.) Hey Christina. FWIW I did the recording in 2013. Yeah it is a slog that I swore away from. So in that regard you are absolutely correct. That said, with a minimal planning sticking a paper ought to do the job. Unless I'm missing the bleeding obvious. Perhaps not for Lightning Talks but for prepared talks almost certainly. Let's say our Tuesday line up is Moe, Larry and Curly. Larry has no interest in being photographed. Unlike Lightning talks which have everyone standing right in front of the stage or dais you can (working with Larry tell him to avoid the front of the room) Tara has volunteered to do this type thing. As soon as Moe is done we go dark. Until Larry has completely gone of stage... or a close approximation of that. Yes it is work. Tara's volunteered to do this I think she should be taken up on it. (Hi Tara) ./fxk -- Mediocrity finds safety in standardization. -- Frederick Crane
Re: [CODE4LIB] Code4LibCon video (Was: Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy)
Correction: We need a Mac, as my encoder is Thunderbolt. I will try to rebuild my MacBook Pro, if I gat a chance. On Jan 26, 2015, at 4:36 PM, Cary Gordon listu...@chillco.com wrote: Just to be clear, I am providing equipment and will set it up, but I do not believe that we have a streaming crew at this time. Riley and I spent almost every moment of the last Con doing this, so while I am willing to teach and help, I am not going to be the video guy again. We also need a decent computer. I am most familiar with Macs, but a PC will do. Linux is not an option. Thanks, Cary On Jan 26, 2015, at 4:26 PM, Ranti Junus ranti.ju...@gmail.com mailto:ranti.ju...@gmail.com wrote: I agree that streaming crew should be free from doing the paperwork. Tara has volunteered to be the paperwork person and I'm volunteering to help her out. I think streaming crew, Tara, and I can discuss separately on things that are need to be done or information we should provide (e.g. list of those who opt-out, their talk schedule, etc.) to the streaming crew. thanks, ranti. On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 7:07 PM, Cary Gordon listu...@chillco.com mailto:listu...@chillco.com wrote: To be clear, what I said or tried to say is that the streaming crew needs to know if he presenter does not wish to be shown, or if they do not want their presentation shown before they start presenting. At least one full minute before would be great. They can take our word that we will honor their wishes. I think that it is fair to say that nobody involved with the video wants anything to do with paperwork, and if anyone has the time and energy to do that, their time would be better spent actually working on the video crew, which at this point is virtually nonexistent. Every presenter should know that we will be putting up video of their session or talk on our YouTube channel with a CC license, unless they demure. We should have a small sign to that effect at the podium, as well. -- Cary Gordon The Cherry Hill Company http://chillco.com http://chillco.com/ -- Bulk mail. Postage paid.
Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy
I agree, it would be difficult to make some presentations anonymous and others not, it is really an on or off deal. //Riley Sent from my Windows Phone -- Riley Childs Senior Charlotte United Christian Academy Library Services Administrator IT Services Administrator (704) 537-0331x101 (704) 497-2086 rileychilds.net @rowdychildren I use Lync (select External Contact on any XMPP chat client) CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and any files transmitted with it are the property of Charlotte United Christian Academy. This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain confidential information that is privileged and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not one of the named original recipients or have received this e-mail in error, please permanently delete the original and any copy of any e-mail and any printout thereof. Thank you for your compliance. This email is also subject to copyright. No part of it nor any attachments may be reproduced, adapted, forwarded or transmitted without the written consent of the copyright ow...@cucawarriors.com From: Tara Robertsonmailto:trobert...@langara.bc.ca Sent: 1/26/2015 3:35 PM To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDUmailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy If it's too burdensome for the livestream crew, I'd be happy to volunteer to work with the program committee and streaming committee to make it happen. I'd be willing to adapt the plain English consent sheet we used for Access and the International Evergreen conference. I think it's important for communication to be clear about where the video will be streamed and archived. As a presenter I'm definately more mindful about what I'm saying if I know it's going to be published to the web. I think informed consent is important. Tara On 26/01/2015 12:00 PM, Cary Gordon wrote: I think that requiring explicit permission from presenters is overly burdensome for the crew that is struggling to get the recordings up. I think that speakers and presenters should be informed that all presentations may be recorded and made available to the public unless they inform the conference committee that they do not want to be recorded before their presentation begins. If they object, the video crew will refrain from capturing their presentation. If we do screen capture again, it is possible that presenter could have the option of allowing us to record their voice and screen. Cary On Jan 26, 2015, at 10:58 AM, Andreas Orphanides akorp...@ncsu.edu wrote: We would definitely want to both give notice to the presenters that the plan is to record and to get consent (or dissent) ahead of time, so that we can plan AV appropriately if someone does not want to be broadcast. It would be awful to broadcast someone who didn't consent to it; nor would we want to have to disrupt things in progress to adjust for an unexpected dissent that should/could have been expected. On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Tara Robertson trobert...@langara.bc.ca wrote: I love this conversation. WRT presenters, I think it's good to be explicit that the plan is to stream and record. It would be good practice to have presenters sign a consent form agreeing to this. Tara On 26/01/2015 10:42 AM, Andreas Orphanides wrote: Sounds like we've got an established practice in place, then. Awesome. Wouldn't hurt for us to clarify any policy we decide on to state that presenters are welcome to not consent to webcast. On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:41 PM, William Denton w...@pobox.com wrote: On 26 January 2015, Andreas Orphanides wrote: Not to complicate things: shall (or *how shall*) we accommodate requests from presenters who might have a no photo preference vis-a-vis conference webcast? A few years ago a speaker didn't want to be filmed, and someone turned off the camera and put a paper bag over it for the duration. Bill -- William Denton ↔ Toronto, Canada ↔ https://www.miskatonic.org/ -- Tara Robertson Accessibility Librarian, CAPER-BC http://caperbc.ca/ T 604.323.5254 F 604.323.5954 trobert...@langara.bc.ca mailto:Tara%20Robertson%20% 3ctrobert...@langara.bc.ca%3E Langara. http://www.langara.bc.ca 100 West 49th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Y 2Z6 -- Tara Robertson Accessibility Librarian, CAPER-BC http://caperbc.ca/ T 604.323.5254 F 604.323.5954 trobert...@langara.bc.ca mailto:tara%20robertson%20%3ctrobert...@langara.bc.ca%3E Langara. http://www.langara.bc.ca 100 West 49th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Y 2Z6
