Re: [CODE4LIB] Durability of PDFs

2009-07-01 Thread Lars Aronsson
Benjamin O'Steen wrote: The easiest way to create these at the moment, is to use OpenOffice 3 and choose the Save As PDF and tick the PDF/A option. Is there some free software that can verify if a given PDF file really is a valid PDF/A file? If I want users to upload their documents to an

[CODE4LIB] Durability of PDFs

2009-06-15 Thread Mike Taylor
Dear CODE4LIB colleagues, In one of my alternative incarnations, I am a zoological taxonomist. One of the big issues for taxonomy right now is whether to accept as nomenclaturally valid papers that are published only in electronic form, i.e. not printed on paper by a publisher. In a discussion

Re: [CODE4LIB] Durability of PDFs

2009-06-15 Thread Benjamin O'Steen
There are items/options that can be used within a given PDF that will drastically affect how likely it is that the PDF will still be readable. * Inclusion of 3D applets or any Adobe Acrobat specific features I have seen PDFs with 3D chemical applets embedded somehow into the PDF using a

Re: [CODE4LIB] Durability of PDFs

2009-06-15 Thread K.G. Schneider
In one of my alternative incarnations, I am a zoological taxonomist. One of the big issues for taxonomy right now is whether to accept as nomenclaturally valid papers that are published only in electronic form, i.e. not printed on paper by a publisher. In a discussion of this matter, a

Re: [CODE4LIB] Durability of PDFs

2009-06-15 Thread Mike Taylor
K.G. Schneider writes: [PDF files will not become unreadable] in the next 30-40 years. Possibly not in the 20 years that will follow. After that, when only 30-year and older documents are in the PDF format, the danger will increase that this information will not be readable any

Re: [CODE4LIB] Durability of PDFs

2009-06-15 Thread Thomas Dowling
On 06/15/2009 07:45 AM, K.G. Schneider wrote: Setting aside the paper/electronic argument, in terms of canonical files for documents intended for long-term preservation, PDF seems a very weak choice. Whether or not the actual files will last 100 years (I assume that we mean that they won't

Re: [CODE4LIB] Durability of PDFs

2009-06-15 Thread Toke Eskildsen
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 12:37 +0200, Mike Taylor wrote: I would appreciate any comments that anyone on this list has on the likelihood that PDF will be unreadable in 100 years. The problem with projections such as these are that we have very little empiric evidence to build on. The classic

Re: [CODE4LIB] Durability of PDFs

2009-06-15 Thread Jonathan Rochkind
mobile # do...@uta.edu # http://rocky.uta.edu/doran/ -Original Message- From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of Jonathan Rochkind Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 9:13 AM To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Durability of PDFs The bet

Re: [CODE4LIB] Durability of PDFs

2009-06-15 Thread Ben O'Steen
[mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of Jonathan Rochkind Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 9:13 AM To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Durability of PDFs The bet is that PDFs are so popular that _someone_ (the archival community if no-one else, but probably someone else