Re: [CODE4LIB] LCSH and Linked Data [cataloging]

2011-04-18 Thread Eric Lease Morgan
On Apr 17, 2011, at 10:58 AM, Bill Dueber wrote:

 OK, so I've been trying to follow all of this, and have to say, I'm finding
 it all very interesting. I want to give a special shout-out to the cataloger
 who have joined in; I (and, I think, much of code4lib) need this kind of
 input on a much more regular basis than we've been getting it.


I concur. It is nice to have the balance of traditional cataloging mixed with 
21st Century hacking. At the same time, it behooves some of us Code4Libbers to 
be a part of hardcore mailing lists like AUTOCAT. Think Hillmann's talk at the 
most recent conference.

-- 
Eric Needs To Practice What He Preaches Morgan
University of Notre Dame


Re: [CODE4LIB] LCSH and Linked Data [cataloging]

2011-04-18 Thread Diane I. Hillmann
 Oh jeez, I'm not sure I'd suggest AutoCat.  Even I can't bear that. 
 But the RDA-L list has a fair amount of discussion that still dusts 
off the traditional issues and tries to figure out what sill matters.


Diane Hillmann


On Apr 17, 2011, at 10:58 AM, Bill Dueber wrote:


OK, so I've been trying to follow all of this, and have to say, I'm finding
it all very interesting. I want to give a special shout-out to the cataloger
who have joined in; I (and, I think, much of code4lib) need this kind of
input on a much more regular basis than we've been getting it.


I concur. It is nice to have the balance of traditional cataloging mixed with 
21st Century hacking. At the same time, it behooves some of us Code4Libbers to 
be a part of hardcore mailing lists like AUTOCAT. Think Hillmann's talk at the 
most recent conference.