Re: [CODE4LIB] MARC 21 and MODS

2009-01-29 Thread Jon Phipps
.nd.edu] On Behalf Of >> Tim Cornwell >> Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 8:46 AM >> To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU >> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] MARC 21 and MODS >> >> >> ... >> >> >>> As a starting point in exploring semantic web type

Re: [CODE4LIB] MARC 21 and MODS

2009-01-29 Thread Diane I. Hillmann
8:46 AM To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] MARC 21 and MODS ... As a starting point in exploring semantic web types of technologies we are establishing a registry for controlled values used in various standards-- MARC, MODS, PREMIS. See the text at: http://id.loc.gov In th

Re: [CODE4LIB] MARC 21 and MODS

2009-01-29 Thread Han, Yan
alf Of Tim Cornwell Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 8:46 AM To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] MARC 21 and MODS ... > > As a starting point in exploring semantic web types of > technologies we are establishing a registry for controlled > values used in various standard

Re: [CODE4LIB] MARC 21 and MODS

2009-01-29 Thread Tim Cornwell
... > > As a starting point in exploring semantic web types of > technologies we are establishing a registry for controlled > values used in various standards-- MARC, MODS, PREMIS. See > the text at: > http://id.loc.gov > In the meantime we have a prototype at: > http://www.loc.gov:8081/stand

Re: [CODE4LIB] MARC 21 and MODS

2009-01-29 Thread Alexander Johannesen
Hi there, On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 15:55, Rebecca S Guenther wrote: > Yes, better late than never (we're a small office and stretched thin). You're not *that* small, no? :) > Also we want to explore MARC/RDF. We also have to keep in mind > that MARC is also used by non-AACR2 users (and when RDA

Re: [CODE4LIB] MARC 21 and MODS

2009-01-29 Thread Rebecca S Guenther
>>> Alexander Johannesen 1/28/2009 2:53 PM >>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 20:29, Rebecca S Guenther wrote: >> We are also working on modeling MODS as RDF-- some >> work has already been done on this. >That is good news, albeit a little late and certainly a little slow. >But I hear good things about

Re: [CODE4LIB] MARC 21 and MODS

2009-01-28 Thread Alexander Johannesen
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 20:29, Rebecca S Guenther wrote: > It is interesting though that a study of different metadata > formats at Los Alamos National Labs a few years ago > concluded that MARCXML was the richest and most robust. > http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september06/goldsmith/09goldsmith.html

[CODE4LIB] MARC 21 and MODS

2009-01-28 Thread Rebecca S Guenther
In response to some of the recent posts on this list (some excerpted below)... People often confuse what is required by the MARC 21 syntax with what is in the element set and with what content rules are applied to populate the elements (I saw some of this confusion in the various posts on this t