Re: [CODE4LIB] Minimal bibliographic record as filename

2013-05-23 Thread Kevin Hawkins
I agree with Bryan's caution against relying on publisher's use of 
ISBNs.  You can't even rely on the ebook having an ISBN different from 
that used by the print edition (or one of the print editions).


There is nothing like ISSN-L for ISBNs.  You could use the "What Work?" 
LibraryThing API:


http://www.librarything.com/wiki/index.php/LibraryThing_APIs

--Kevin

On 2:59 PM, Joel Marchesoni wrote:

I like the idea of a master ISBN (one number to rule them all? Sorry, too easy) 
but I think failing that I'd stick with the Ebook's ISBN. Any search on it will 
give a user the title and author of the work. Plus, it gives you a unique 
number for each item.

Joel

-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Michael 
Lackhoff
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 02:30
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Minimal bibliographic record as filename

On 21.05.2013 20:14 Eric Lease Morgan wrote:


The convention I have always used included the first word of the author's last 
name, the first (non-stop) word of the title, and an integer (accession number):

   plato-republic-105.epub


It has the advantage of being short but I would like a bit more info, at least 
publication year and a longer part of the title and the/a ISBN.
Perhaps I will just make something up myself.

Since I would also like to include the ISBN, is there such a thing like a "main" or 
"master" ISBN in case a work has more than one of them? I am looking for something like 
the ISSN-L, but of course for books instead of journals. Something like the reverse of the xISBN 
service: 'many to one' instead of 'one to many'.
If there is nothing like that I might just use the first one given in the book.

-Michael


Re: [CODE4LIB] Minimal bibliographic record as filename

2013-05-22 Thread Michael Lackhoff
On 22.05.2013 16:45 Bryan Baldus wrote:

> On Wednesday, May 22, 2013 8:01 AM, Joel Marchesoni wrote:
>> I like the idea of a master ISBN (one number to rule them all?
>> Sorry, too easy) but I think failing that I'd stick with the
[...]
> As far as I know, there is not
> "such a thing like a "main" or "master" ISBN" [1].

The idea was to have a part for humans (title, author, year) to get an
idea about the book (even if it is not as well known as Platos Republic)
and some sort of identifier that makes it easy to get more info about
the book (the full record).
This should still be possible though as I see more clearly after your
responses not in a strict sense.

Thanks for sharing your thoughts
-Michael

p.s.: By the way, I had an additional use case in mind. I have the idea
to mirror my personal printed book collection in the file system with a
folder for every shelf with subfolders for every book, named similarly
as outlined in this thread and then put everything I can get about my
books into these folders: MARC-XML record, cover image, scanned/OCRed
table of content where available...
The idea is that a simple file search/grep would be enough to find
stuff. Perhaps a bit odd but I am fond of usable low tech solutions ;-)


Re: [CODE4LIB] Minimal bibliographic record as filename

2013-05-22 Thread Bryan Baldus
On Wednesday, May 22, 2013 8:01 AM, Joel Marchesoni wrote:
>I like the idea of a master ISBN (one number to rule them all? Sorry, too 
>easy) but I think failing that I'd stick with the Ebook's ISBN. Any search on 
>it will give a user the title and author of the work. Plus, it gives you a 
>unique number for each item.

Are publishers better about how they use ISBNs on electronic resources than 
they are on books? Because an ISBN, while theoretically unique when applied as 
intended, is certainly not always unique in practice (where publishers reuse 
ISBNs for subsequent editions, and even sometimes for completely different 
books). That said, if you are including an ISBN in the name (for resources 
which have ISBNs), then I'd agree that the one that applies to the e-book 
version(s) should be used rather than the one(s) that should apply to the print 
version(s). As far as I know, there is not "such a thing like a "main" or 
"master" ISBN" [1].

###

[1] Wednesday, May 22, 2013 02:30, Michael Lackhoff

Thank you for your time,

Bryan Baldus
Senior Cataloger
Quality Books Inc.
The Best of America's Independent Presses
1-800-323-4241x402
bryan.bal...@quality-books.com


Re: [CODE4LIB] Minimal bibliographic record as filename

2013-05-22 Thread Joel Marchesoni
I like the idea of a master ISBN (one number to rule them all? Sorry, too easy) 
but I think failing that I'd stick with the Ebook's ISBN. Any search on it will 
give a user the title and author of the work. Plus, it gives you a unique 
number for each item.

Joel

-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Michael 
Lackhoff
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 02:30
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Minimal bibliographic record as filename

On 21.05.2013 20:14 Eric Lease Morgan wrote:

> The convention I have always used included the first word of the author's 
> last name, the first (non-stop) word of the title, and an integer (accession 
> number):
> 
>   plato-republic-105.epub

It has the advantage of being short but I would like a bit more info, at least 
publication year and a longer part of the title and the/a ISBN.
Perhaps I will just make something up myself.

Since I would also like to include the ISBN, is there such a thing like a 
"main" or "master" ISBN in case a work has more than one of them? I am looking 
for something like the ISSN-L, but of course for books instead of journals. 
Something like the reverse of the xISBN service: 'many to one' instead of 'one 
to many'.
If there is nothing like that I might just use the first one given in the book.

-Michael


Re: [CODE4LIB] Minimal bibliographic record as filename

2013-05-21 Thread Michael Lackhoff
On 21.05.2013 20:14 Eric Lease Morgan wrote:

> The convention I have always used included the first word of the author's 
> last name, the first (non-stop) word of the title, and an integer (accession 
> number):
> 
>   plato-republic-105.epub

It has the advantage of being short but I would like a bit more info, at
least publication year and a longer part of the title and the/a ISBN.
Perhaps I will just make something up myself.

Since I would also like to include the ISBN, is there such a thing like
a "main" or "master" ISBN in case a work has more than one of them? I am
looking for something like the ISSN-L, but of course for books instead
of journals. Something like the reverse of the xISBN service: 'many to
one' instead of 'one to many'.
If there is nothing like that I might just use the first one given in
the book.

-Michael


Re: [CODE4LIB] Minimal bibliographic record as filename

2013-05-21 Thread Eric Lease Morgan
> Is the integer just a sequential count of all items or is it specific to
> the name title pair?

It is a unique integer (sequential count), and possibly a key for some sort. 
--ELM


Re: [CODE4LIB] Minimal bibliographic record as filename

2013-05-21 Thread Kevin S. Clarke
Is the integer just a sequential count of all items or is it specific to
the name title pair?

Kevin
On May 21, 2013 2:14 PM, "Eric Lease Morgan"  wrote:

> On May 21, 2013, at 2:10 PM, Michael Lackhoff  wrote:
>
> > Ebooks as you get them have very different naming schemes and I would
> > like to rename them according to a common naming convention which should
> > include some important bibliographic data like publication year, title
> > (up to what length?), ISBN (which one? ISBN10, ISBN13, the "better
> > known" ISBN of the printed version or the one of the electronic
> > version?), perhaps publisher and author(s) (how many?).
>
> The convention I have always used included the first word of the author's
> last name, the first (non-stop) word of the title, and an integer
> (accession number):
>
>   plato-republic-105.epub
>
> --
> Eric Morgan
>


Re: [CODE4LIB] Minimal bibliographic record as filename

2013-05-21 Thread Eric Lease Morgan
On May 21, 2013, at 2:10 PM, Michael Lackhoff  wrote:

> Ebooks as you get them have very different naming schemes and I would
> like to rename them according to a common naming convention which should
> include some important bibliographic data like publication year, title
> (up to what length?), ISBN (which one? ISBN10, ISBN13, the "better
> known" ISBN of the printed version or the one of the electronic
> version?), perhaps publisher and author(s) (how many?).

The convention I have always used included the first word of the author's last 
name, the first (non-stop) word of the title, and an integer (accession number):

  plato-republic-105.epub

--
Eric Morgan


[CODE4LIB] Minimal bibliographic record as filename

2013-05-21 Thread Michael Lackhoff
Ebooks as you get them have very different naming schemes and I would
like to rename them according to a common naming convention which should
include some important bibliographic data like publication year, title
(up to what length?), ISBN (which one? ISBN10, ISBN13, the "better
known" ISBN of the printed version or the one of the electronic
version?), perhaps publisher and author(s) (how many?).

As you can see I have some idea but even more question marks. Are there
any templates out there I could use or adapt?
Ideally I would write a script to rename the books, so it should cover
most real world cases in a sensible way, so it contains the essential
data without getting too long.

Any ideas?

-Michael