Hi Clay,
I completely agree with everything you just wrote, especially about
Atom + APP being more than just a technology for blogs. APP is a
great lightweight alternative to WebDAV, and promising for all sorts
of data transfer. The fact that it has developer groundswell is a
huge plus.
Peter wrote:
Also, re: blog mirroring, I highly recommend the current discussions
floating aroung the blogosphere regarding distributed source control (Git,
Mercurial, etc.). It's a fundamental paradigm shift from centralized
control to distributed control that points the way toward the future
Hi Jakob-
Yes, I think you are correct that it is a bit much to think that a
distributed archiving model is a bit much for libraries to even consider
now, but I do think there are useful insights to be gained here.
As it stands now, linux developers using Git can carry around the entire
change
not, for instance, and entire library catalog? If I could check out the
library catalog onto my computer use whatever tools I wished to search,
Peter,
You might be interested in Art Rhyno's experiment. Here's Jon Udell's summary:
Art Rhyno’s science project
Art Rhyno’s title is Systems
Very interesting! I will check it out
-Peter
On Thu, 25 Oct 2007, Jason Stirnaman wrote:
not, for instance, and entire library catalog? If I could check out the
library catalog onto my computer use whatever tools I wished to search,
Peter,
You might be interested in Art Rhyno's
This conversation about Atom is, I think, really an important one to have.
As well designed and thought out as protocols standards such as OAI-PMH,
METS (and the budding OAI-ORE spec) are, they don't have that viral
technology attribute of utter simplicity. Sure there are trade-offs, but
the
Hi Peter,
I completely agree with everything you just wrote, especially about
Atom + APP being more than just a technology for blogs. APP is a
great lightweight alternative to WebDAV, and promising for all sorts
of data transfer. The fact that it has developer groundswell is a
huge plus.
Hi Ed,
You wrote:
I completely agree. When developing software it's really important to
focus on the cleanest/clearest solution, rather than getting bogged
down in edge cases and the comments from nay sayers. I hope that my
response didn't come across that way.
:-)
A couple follow on
Ed Summers wrote:
Thanks for posting this Jakob. I was just reading RFC 5005 on the
train yesterday (literally) and the parallels between it and OAI-PMH
struck me as well. It's not quite clear to me how deleted records
would be handled with an atom archive feed. But I guess one could
assume if
On 10/22/07, Jakob Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I doubt that archiving weblogs is that complicated [1]! You need a
harvester (partly implemented in many Feed-Reader), an archive (you
could start with just saving validated ATOM-Files), an index (Solr?) and
a reader (also already implemented in
On 10/19/07, Ed Summers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stuart Weibel has written [1] about the subject of blog archiving in
the past. And I remember hearing Jon Udell and Dan Chudnov talk about
it [2].
Dan also wrote about blog mirroring, which may be applicable, here:
Thanks for posting this Jakob. I was just reading RFC 5005 on the
train yesterday (literally) and the parallels between it and OAI-PMH
struck me as well. It's not quite clear to me how deleted records
would be handled with an atom archive feed. But I guess one could
assume if the identifier is no
12 matches
Mail list logo
