[mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of
karim boughida
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2012 5:09 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] U of Baltimore, Final Usability Report, link
resolvers --
MIA?
Hi Tom,
Top players are EDS, Primo and Summonthe only reason I see encore
Of
karim boughida
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2012 5:09 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] U of Baltimore, Final Usability Report, link
resolvers --
MIA?
Hi Tom,
Top players are EDS, Primo and Summonthe only reason I see encore
in the
mix is if you have
of Baltimore, Final Usability Report, link
resolvers --
MIA?
Hi Tom,
Top players are EDS, Primo and Summonthe only reason I see encore in
the
mix is if you have other III products which is not the case of Ubalt
library. They
have now worldcat? Encore vs Summon is an easy win for summon
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] U of Baltimore, Final Usability Report, link resolvers
-- MIA?
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 9:06 AM, Cindy Harper char...@colgate.edu wrote:
I was going to comment that some of the Encore shortcomings mentioned in
the PDf do seem to be addressed in current Encore versions
: Re: [CODE4LIB] U of Baltimore, Final Usability Report, link resolvers
-- MIA?
Solr has a feature to make spelling suggestions based on the actual terms in
the corpus... but it's hardly a panacea. A straightforward naive
implementation of the Solr feature, on top of a large library catalog
[rossfsin...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 9:37 AM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] U of Baltimore, Final Usability Report, link
resolvers -- MIA?
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 9:06 AM, Cindy Harper char...@colgate.edu wrote:
I was going to comment that some
Yes, there were (we used 360 Link during the testing). This is one of the
reasons we turned on 1-Click about 6 months ago and have been fairly
pleased with the results.
-emily
--
Date:Tue, 4 Sep 2012 10:58:28 -0400
From:Jimmy Ghaphery jghap...@vcu.edu
We've also gone with one-click for the reasons outlined in the NCSU report.
Tim
On 9/5/12 9:04 AM, Emily Lynema emily_lyn...@ncsu.edu wrote:
Yes, there were (we used 360 Link during the testing). This is one of the
reasons we turned on 1-Click about 6 months ago and have been fairly
pleased
On 9/5/2012 9:04 AM, Emily Lynema wrote:
Yes, there were (we used 360 Link during the testing). This is one of the
reasons we turned on 1-Click about 6 months ago and have been fairly
pleased with the results.
What does turn on 1-Click mean with regard to Summon?
This has turned into a
1-Click doesn't really have anything to do with Summon. But it has to do
with the link resolver. The thing about Summon (as opposed to other tools
sometimes used as a starting point for users) is that it does not locally
provide any access to full-text.
When we first implemented Summon back in
Ah, thanks.
If you are thinking of using Summon with a different link resolver,
you'd have to see if they provide a similar pass-through type service. I
*think* that SFX does.
SFX indeed does, but I think on the same basis as 360Link -- turn it on
or off globally.
Umlaut, the open
@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of
karim boughida
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2012 5:09 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] U of Baltimore, Final Usability Report, link
resolvers --
MIA?
Hi Tom,
Top players are EDS, Primo and Summonthe only reason I see encore in the
mix
Hi helpful code4lib community, at one point there was a report online at:
http://student-iat.ubalt.edu/students/kerber_n/idia642/Final_Usability_Report.pdf
David Walker tells me the report at that location included findings
about SFX and/or other link resolvers.
I'm really interested in
It's like a google search challenge! Looks like they changed their student
home link patterns...
http://home.ubalt.edu/nicole.kerber/idia642/Final_Usability_Report.pdf
Thanks,
matt
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu wrote:
Hi helpful code4lib community, at
On Sep 4, 2012, at 10:48 AM, Matthew LeVan wrote:
It's like a google search challenge! Looks like they changed their student
home link patterns...
http://home.ubalt.edu/nicole.kerber/idia642/Final_Usability_Report.pdf
That's a challenge?
Also the NC State study on Summon is worth mentioning. If memory serves
there was consistent issues with the last mile in getting to the resource.
http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/userstudies/studies/2010summon
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Matthew LeVan levan.matt...@gmail.comwrote:
It's like a
Ha, I'm terrible at google searching apparently, thanks Matt and Joe, I
believe that is what I was looking for. code4lib++
On 9/4/2012 10:48 AM, Matthew LeVan wrote:
It's like a google search challenge! Looks like they changed their student
home link patterns...
Hi All,
Initially EDS, Primo, Summon, and Encore were considered but only
Encore and Summon were tested. Do we know why?
Thanks
Karim Boughida
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu wrote:
Hi helpful code4lib community, at one point there was a report online at:
Yes, I'm curious to know too! Due to database/resource matching or coverage
perhaps (anyone's guess).
Tom
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 7:50 AM, karim boughida kbough...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Initially EDS, Primo, Summon, and Encore were considered but only
Encore and Summon were tested. Do we
@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of
karim boughida
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2012 3:51 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] U of Baltimore, Final Usability Report, link
resolvers --
MIA?
Hi All,
Initially EDS, Primo, Summon, and Encore were considered but only Encore
Hi Tom,
Top players are EDS, Primo and Summonthe only reason I see encore
in the mix is if you have other III products which is not the case of
Ubalt library. They have now worldcat? Encore vs Summon is an easy win
for summon.
Let's wait for Jonathan LeBreton (Thanks BTW).
Karim Boughida
On
21 matches
Mail list logo
