Re: [CODE4LIB] conf presenters: a kind request

2013-02-05 Thread Wilhelmina Randtke
If your university or any local professional groups have brown bag lunches
with presentations, or anything informal and about the same amount of time
as the conference presentation, then you can ask the group if you can do a
dry run there.

-Wilhelmina Randtke


On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Joe Hourcle
onei...@grace.nascom.nasa.govwrote:

 On Feb 4, 2013, at 11:25 AM, Bill Dueber wrote:

 [trimmed (and agreed with all of that)]

  As Jonathan said: this is a great, great audience. We're all forgiving,
  we're all interested, we're all eager to lean new things and figure out
 how
  to apply them to our own situations. We love to hear about your
 successes.
  We *love* to hear about failures that include a way for us to avoid them,
  and you're going to be well-received no matter what because a bunch of
  people voted to hear you!

 I'd actually be interested in people's complaints about bad presentations;
 I've been keeping notes for years, with the intention of making a
 presentation on giving better presentations.  (but it's much harder than
 it sounds, as I plan on making all of the mistakes during the presentation)


  On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu
 wrote:
 
  We are all very excited about the conference next week, to speak to our
  peers and to hear what our peers have to say!
 
  I would like to suggest that those presenting be considerate to your
  audience, and actually prepare your talk in advance!

 [trimmed]

  Just practice it once in advance (even the night before, as a last
  resort!), and it'll go great!


 I did one of those 'Ignite' talks this year; because it's auto-
 advancing slides, I went over it multiple times.  My recommendation
 is that you try to get various co-workers as guinea pigs.  I even
 subjected one of my neighbors to it, even though he wasn't necessarily
 part of the intended audience.

 They gave me a lot of feed back -- asking for clarification on bits,
 we realized I could trim down a couple of slides, giving me more
 slides to expand other bits.  I still screwed up the presentation,
 but it would have been much worse if I hadn't practiced.

 My local ASIST chapter used to run 'preview' events before the
 annual meeting, where the local folks presenting at annual were
 invited to give their talks.  If nothing else, it forced you to
 have it done a couple of weeks early, but more importantly, it
 gave me a chance to have a similar audience to what would be
 at the main meeting ... one of my talks bombed hard;  it was on
 standards  protocols for scientific data, and I hadn't considered
 just how bad a talk that's 50% acronyms would go over.  I was
 able to change how I presented the material so it wasn't quite
 so painful the second time around.

 There's only been once when practicing in advanced made for a worse
 presentation ... and that's because when I finished, PowerPoint asked
 me if I wanted to save the timings ... what ever you do, do *not*
 tell it yes.  Because then it'll auto-advance your slides, so when
 you skip over one slide during the practice, it'll not let you
 have it up during the real talk.

 (There's a setting to turn off use of timings ... and the audience
 laughed when I kept scolding the computer, but it still felt
 horrible when I was up there)

 And it's important that you *must* practice in front of other
 people.  How fast you think it's going to take you, or how fast
 it takes you talking to yourself is nothing like talking in
 front of other people.

 ...

 So, all of that being said, some of the things I've made a note
 of over the years.  (it's incomplete, as I've still take notes
 by hand, and there are more items on the back pages of the
 various memo books I've had over the years)

 * Get there before the session, and test your presentation on the
   same hardware as it's going to be presented from.  This is
   especially important if you're a Mac user, and presenting from
   a PC, or visa-versa.  Look for odd fonts, images that didn't
   load, videos, abnormal gamma, bad font sizes (may result in
   missing test), missing characters, incorrect justification, etc.

 * If you're going to be presenting from your own machine, still
   test it out, to make sure that you have all of the necessary
   adaptors, that you know what needs to be done to switch the
   monitor, that the machine detects the projector at a reasonable
   size and the gamma's adjusted correctly.  (and have it loaded
   in advance; you're wasting enough time switching machines).
   And start switching machines while the last presenter's doing
   QA ... and if you lose 5 min because of switching, prepare
   to cut your talk short, force the following presenters to lose
   time)

 * Have a backup plan, with the presentation stashed on a website
   that you've memorized the URL to, *and* on a USB stick.
   (website is safer vs. virus transfer, only use the USB stick
   if there's no internet)  And put the file at the top level of

Re: [CODE4LIB] conf presenters: a kind request

2013-02-05 Thread Joe Hourcle
On Feb 5, 2013, at 9:42 AM, Wilhelmina Randtke wrote:

 If your university or any local professional groups have brown bag lunches
 with presentations, or anything informal and about the same amount of time
 as the conference presentation, then you can ask the group if you can do a
 dry run there.

And if you want to get critiques on the manner of presentation, rather
than the content, you might consider checking to see if there's a
Toastmasters group in your area:

http://www.toastmasters.org/

(there are some dues associated with the club, though ... but for those
with a fear of public speaking, they can help you through it)

-Joe


[CODE4LIB] conf presenters: a kind request

2013-02-04 Thread Jonathan Rochkind
We are all very excited about the conference next week, to speak to our 
peers and to hear what our peers have to say!


I would like to suggest that those presenting be considerate to your 
audience, and actually prepare your talk in advance!


You may think you can get away with making some slides that morning 
during someone elses talk and winging it; nobody will notice right? Or 
they wont' care if they do?


From past years, I can say that for me at least, yeah, I can often tell 
who hasn't actually prepared their talk. And I'll consider it 
disrespectful to the time of the audience, who voted for your talk and 
then got on airplanes to come see it, and you didn't spend the time to 
plan it advance and make it as high quality for them as you could.


I don't mean to make people nervous about public speaking. The code4lib 
audience is a very kind and generous audience, they are a good audience. 
It'll go great! Just maybe repay their generosity by actually preparing 
your talk in advance, you know?  Do your best, it'll go great!


If you aren't sure how to do this, the one thing you can probably do to 
prepare (maybe this is obvious) is practice your presentation in 
advance, with a timer, just once.  In front of a friend or just by 
yourself. Did you finish on time, and get at least half of what was 
important in? Then you're done preparing, that was it!  Yes, if you're 
going to have slides, this means making your slides or notes/outline in 
advance so you can practice your delivery just once!


Just practice it once in advance (even the night before, as a last 
resort!), and it'll go great!


Jonathan


Re: [CODE4LIB] conf presenters: a kind request

2013-02-04 Thread Bill Dueber
I'm gonna add to this briefly, and probably a bit less tactfully than
Jonathan :-)

   - My number-one complaint about past presentations: Don't have slides we
   can't read. You probably can't read this, but... isn't a helpful thing to
   hear during a presentation. Make it legible, or figure out a different way
   to present the information. A kick-ass poster or UML diagram or flowchart
   or whatever isn't kick-ass when we can't read it. It's just an
   uninformative blur.  [Note: this doesn't mean you shouldn't include the
   kick-ass poster when you upload your slides. Please do!]
   - Make sure your content fits well in the time allotted. You're not
   there to get through as much as possible. You're there to best use our
   collective time to make the argument that what you're doing is
   important/impressive/worth knowing, and to convey *as much of the
   interesting bits as you can without rushing*. The goal isn't for you to
   get lots of words out of your mouth; the goal is for us to understand them.
   If you absolutely can't cut it down to a point where you're not rushing,
   then you haven't done the hard work of distilling out the interesting bits,
   and you should get on that right away.
   - On the flip side, don't present for 8mn and leave plenty of time for
   questions. Odds are your'e not saying anything interesting enough to
   elicit questions in those 8 minutes. If you really only have 8mn of
   content, well, you shouldn't have proposed a talk. But odds are you *do*
   have interesting things to say, and may want to chat with your colleagues
   to figure out exactly what that is.
   - Don't make the 3.38 million messages on creating a non-threatening
   environment be for naught. Please.

As Jonathan said: this is a great, great audience. We're all forgiving,
we're all interested, we're all eager to lean new things and figure out how
to apply them to our own situations. We love to hear about your successes.
We *love* to hear about failures that include a way for us to avoid them,
and you're going to be well-received no matter what because a bunch of
people voted to hear you!





On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu wrote:

 We are all very excited about the conference next week, to speak to our
 peers and to hear what our peers have to say!

 I would like to suggest that those presenting be considerate to your
 audience, and actually prepare your talk in advance!

 You may think you can get away with making some slides that morning during
 someone elses talk and winging it; nobody will notice right? Or they wont'
 care if they do?

 From past years, I can say that for me at least, yeah, I can often tell
 who hasn't actually prepared their talk. And I'll consider it disrespectful
 to the time of the audience, who voted for your talk and then got on
 airplanes to come see it, and you didn't spend the time to plan it advance
 and make it as high quality for them as you could.

 I don't mean to make people nervous about public speaking. The code4lib
 audience is a very kind and generous audience, they are a good audience.
 It'll go great! Just maybe repay their generosity by actually preparing
 your talk in advance, you know?  Do your best, it'll go great!

 If you aren't sure how to do this, the one thing you can probably do to
 prepare (maybe this is obvious) is practice your presentation in advance,
 with a timer, just once.  In front of a friend or just by yourself. Did you
 finish on time, and get at least half of what was important in? Then you're
 done preparing, that was it!  Yes, if you're going to have slides, this
 means making your slides or notes/outline in advance so you can practice
 your delivery just once!

 Just practice it once in advance (even the night before, as a last
 resort!), and it'll go great!

 Jonathan




-- 
Bill Dueber
Library Systems Programmer
University of Michigan Library


Re: [CODE4LIB] conf presenters: a kind request

2013-02-04 Thread Joe Hourcle
On Feb 4, 2013, at 11:25 AM, Bill Dueber wrote:

[trimmed (and agreed with all of that)]

 As Jonathan said: this is a great, great audience. We're all forgiving,
 we're all interested, we're all eager to lean new things and figure out how
 to apply them to our own situations. We love to hear about your successes.
 We *love* to hear about failures that include a way for us to avoid them,
 and you're going to be well-received no matter what because a bunch of
 people voted to hear you!

I'd actually be interested in people's complaints about bad presentations;
I've been keeping notes for years, with the intention of making a
presentation on giving better presentations.  (but it's much harder than
it sounds, as I plan on making all of the mistakes during the presentation)


 On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu wrote:
 
 We are all very excited about the conference next week, to speak to our
 peers and to hear what our peers have to say!
 
 I would like to suggest that those presenting be considerate to your
 audience, and actually prepare your talk in advance!

[trimmed]

 Just practice it once in advance (even the night before, as a last
 resort!), and it'll go great!


I did one of those 'Ignite' talks this year; because it's auto-
advancing slides, I went over it multiple times.  My recommendation
is that you try to get various co-workers as guinea pigs.  I even
subjected one of my neighbors to it, even though he wasn't necessarily
part of the intended audience.

They gave me a lot of feed back -- asking for clarification on bits,
we realized I could trim down a couple of slides, giving me more
slides to expand other bits.  I still screwed up the presentation,
but it would have been much worse if I hadn't practiced.

My local ASIST chapter used to run 'preview' events before the
annual meeting, where the local folks presenting at annual were
invited to give their talks.  If nothing else, it forced you to
have it done a couple of weeks early, but more importantly, it
gave me a chance to have a similar audience to what would be
at the main meeting ... one of my talks bombed hard;  it was on
standards  protocols for scientific data, and I hadn't considered
just how bad a talk that's 50% acronyms would go over.  I was
able to change how I presented the material so it wasn't quite
so painful the second time around.

There's only been once when practicing in advanced made for a worse
presentation ... and that's because when I finished, PowerPoint asked
me if I wanted to save the timings ... what ever you do, do *not*
tell it yes.  Because then it'll auto-advance your slides, so when
you skip over one slide during the practice, it'll not let you
have it up during the real talk.

(There's a setting to turn off use of timings ... and the audience
laughed when I kept scolding the computer, but it still felt
horrible when I was up there)

And it's important that you *must* practice in front of other
people.  How fast you think it's going to take you, or how fast
it takes you talking to yourself is nothing like talking in
front of other people.

...

So, all of that being said, some of the things I've made a note
of over the years.  (it's incomplete, as I've still take notes
by hand, and there are more items on the back pages of the 
various memo books I've had over the years)

* Get there before the session, and test your presentation on the
  same hardware as it's going to be presented from.  This is
  especially important if you're a Mac user, and presenting from
  a PC, or visa-versa.  Look for odd fonts, images that didn't
  load, videos, abnormal gamma, bad font sizes (may result in
  missing test), missing characters, incorrect justification, etc.

* If you're going to be presenting from your own machine, still
  test it out, to make sure that you have all of the necessary
  adaptors, that you know what needs to be done to switch the
  monitor, that the machine detects the projector at a reasonable
  size and the gamma's adjusted correctly.  (and have it loaded
  in advance; you're wasting enough time switching machines).
  And start switching machines while the last presenter's doing
  QA ... and if you lose 5 min because of switching, prepare
  to cut your talk short, force the following presenters to lose
  time)

* Have a backup plan, with the presentation stashed on a website
  that you've memorized the URL to, *and* on a USB stick.
  (website is safer vs. virus transfer, only use the USB stick
  if there's no internet)  And put the file at the top level of
  the USB stick, not buried 12 folders deep.

* If they have those clip on microphones, put it on your label
  on the same side as the screen is to you.  (so whenever you
  turn to look at the screen, it still picks up your voice)

* If you have a stationary mic, you have to actually stay near
  it or it doesn't work.

* Hand-held mics suck unless you're used to them, as most of us
  aren't used to holding our hand up