aff/Violeta-Ilik
From: Code for Libraries [CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] on behalf of Karen Coyle
[li...@kcoyle.net]
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2014 4:58 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] linked data and open access
Off the top o
behalf of Brent Hanner
[behan...@mediumaevum.com]
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2014 6:11 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] linked data and open access
There are deeper issues at work here than just the kind of obvious surface
issues.
One of the reason Europe embraced rdf triples an
>
>
> Well, that raises an important question -- whether an 'end user use', or
> other use, do people have examples of neat/important/useful things done
> with linked data in Europe, especially that would have been harder or less
> likely without the data being modelled/distributed as linked data?
rent Hanner
[behan...@mediumaevum.com]
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2014 6:11 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] linked data and open access
There are deeper issues at work here than just the kind of obvious surface
issues.
One of the reason Europe embraced rdf triples and linked da
There are deeper issues at work here than just the kind of obvious surface
issues.
One of the reason Europe embraced rdf triples and linked data was timing. The
EU was forming its centralized information institutions the same time the idea
of linked data to solve certain problem came about. S
On Dec 19, 2014, at 12:28 PM, Kyle Banerjee wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 7:57 AM, Joe Hourcle
> wrote:
>
>>
>> I can't comment on the linked data side of things so much, but in
>> following all of the comments from the US's push for opening up access to
>> federally funded research, I'd hav
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 7:57 AM, Joe Hourcle
wrote:
>
> I can't comment on the linked data side of things so much, but in
> following all of the comments from the US's push for opening up access to
> federally funded research, I'd have to say that capitalism and
> protectionist attitudes from 'pu
Yep, yep, and yep.
Plus I'd add that the lack of centralization of library direction (read:
states) is also a hindrance here. Having national leadership would be
great. Being smaller also wouldn't hurt.
kc
On 12/19/14 6:48 AM, Eric Lease Morgan wrote:
I don’t know about y’all, but it seems
On Dec 19, 2014, at 9:48 AM, Eric Lease Morgan wrote:
> I don’t know about y’all, but it seems to me that things like linked data and
> open access are larger trends in Europe than here in the United States. Is
> there are larger commitment to sharing in Europe when compared to the United
> Sta
: Code for Libraries on behalf of Debra Shapiro
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 10:18 AM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] linked data and open access
Yes, I absolutely agree Eric - I am not sure if it is because we have no
National Library - it might just be because of the US
Yes, I absolutely agree Eric - I am not sure if it is because we have no
National Library - it might just be because of the US notions of individuality
and freedom of commerce - as a country, we just won't tell anyone what to do,
even if it’s to be open.
LIBER open data agreement:
http://liber
I don’t know about y’all, but it seems to me that things like linked data and
open access are larger trends in Europe than here in the United States. Is
there are larger commitment to sharing in Europe when compared to the United
States? If so, is this a factor based on the nonexistence of a nat
12 matches
Mail list logo
