[CODE4LIB] test of mr. serials
This is at test, and hopefully the only test of the Mr. Serials Process against my Code4Lib mailing list archive. Delete me. —Eric
[CODE4LIB] Test message, please disregard
I am debugging my listserv subscription. This is a test message. Please disregard. Will Martin
[CODE4LIB] test message
This is a test message. This is only a test of the Emergency Test Messaging Service. This is only a message. In case of a real emergency you would be instructed to Contact your nearest Code4Lib subscriber. This is only test message. — Eric “Test Message” Morgan
[CODE4LIB] test
This is a test. Please ignore.
Re: [CODE4LIB] test
A vacuum nature does abhor. On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Peter Schlumpf pschlu...@earthlink.netwrote: This is a test. Please ignore.
Re: [CODE4LIB] test
Quoth the raven, Nevermore! -Original Message- From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Andreas Orphanides Sent: Monday, May 06, 2013 9:50 AM To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] test A vacuum nature does abhor. On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Peter Schlumpf pschlu...@earthlink.netwrote: This is a test. Please ignore.
Re: [CODE4LIB] test
Schofield - I was gonna say that! I'll just show myself to the door. On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Michael Schofield mschofi...@nova.eduwrote: Quoth the raven, Nevermore! -Original Message- From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Andreas Orphanides Sent: Monday, May 06, 2013 9:50 AM To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] test A vacuum nature does abhor. On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Peter Schlumpf pschlu...@earthlink.net wrote: This is a test. Please ignore. -- Jason Paul Michel User Experience Librarian Miami University Libraries 513.529.3935 miche...@muohio.edu @jpmichel https://twitter.com/jpmichel
Re: [CODE4LIB] test
I've never seen this before On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 6:57 AM, Michel, Jason miche...@miamioh.edu wrote: Schofield - I was gonna say that! I'll just show myself to the door. On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Michael Schofield mschofi...@nova.edu wrote: Quoth the raven, Nevermore! -Original Message- From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Andreas Orphanides Sent: Monday, May 06, 2013 9:50 AM To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] test A vacuum nature does abhor. On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Peter Schlumpf pschlu...@earthlink.net wrote: This is a test. Please ignore. -- Jason Paul Michel User Experience Librarian Miami University Libraries 513.529.3935 miche...@muohio.edu @jpmichel https://twitter.com/jpmichel
Re: [CODE4LIB] test
I would not want to be a bore by beating this dead horse some more and rhyming couplets are a chore so code4lib, I do implore in lieu of internet furore let's revert to threads of yore or patching bugs, or hacking core or gitignoring .DS_Store or begging zoia more, more, @more or beering at the liquor store -- Aw, screw it. This is fun. --ay On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Mark Pernotto mark.perno...@gmail.comwrote: I've never seen this before On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 6:57 AM, Michel, Jason miche...@miamioh.edu wrote: Schofield - I was gonna say that! I'll just show myself to the door. On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Michael Schofield mschofi...@nova.edu wrote: Quoth the raven, Nevermore! -Original Message- From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Andreas Orphanides Sent: Monday, May 06, 2013 9:50 AM To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] test A vacuum nature does abhor. On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Peter Schlumpf pschlu...@earthlink.net wrote: This is a test. Please ignore. -- Jason Paul Michel User Experience Librarian Miami University Libraries 513.529.3935 miche...@muohio.edu @jpmichel https://twitter.com/jpmichel
[CODE4LIB] Test dataset for evaluation of automatic classification of research documents according to FAST and DDC
Hi all, I am working on developing a software system designed to analyze the content of research documents (e.g., research papers, articles, etc.) archived in scientific repositories (e.g., http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/ , http://arxiv.org/ ) and automatically classify them according to FAST and DDC. In order to objectively qualify the performance of the system, a collection of research documents which have been manually classified according to the DDC and been assigned FAST subject heading would be required. I was wondering if anyone is aware of such dataset existing online. Regards, Arash
Re: [CODE4LIB] Test dataset for evaluation of automatic classification of research documents according to FAST and DDC
You might want to check out the BASE system from Bielefeld, Germany (http://www.base-search.net), which have access to a lot of OA sources, and implemented an classification system (metadata+fulltext) for DDC themselves on a semi-automatic generated training corpus across all disciplines (might also be useful as a benchmark). They reported last year, that ~1,4% of their OA metadata had manually assigned subject classification on it . Regards, Rene Am 29.06.2012 um 15:29 schrieb Arash.Joorabchi: Hi all, I am working on developing a software system designed to analyze the content of research documents (e.g., research papers, articles, etc.) archived in scientific repositories (e.g., http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/ , http://arxiv.org/ ) and automatically classify them according to FAST and DDC. In order to objectively qualify the performance of the system, a collection of research documents which have been manually classified according to the DDC and been assigned FAST subject heading would be required. I was wondering if anyone is aware of such dataset existing online. Regards, Arash
Re: [CODE4LIB] Test dataset for evaluation of automatic classification of research documents according to FAST and DDC
Not sure if this is what you want, but the FAST dataset is available online from OCLC. http://www.oclc.org/research/activities/fast/download.htm Nathan On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Arash.Joorabchi arash.joorab...@ul.iewrote: Hi all, I am working on developing a software system designed to analyze the content of research documents (e.g., research papers, articles, etc.) archived in scientific repositories (e.g., http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/ , http://arxiv.org/ ) and automatically classify them according to FAST and DDC. In order to objectively qualify the performance of the system, a collection of research documents which have been manually classified according to the DDC and been assigned FAST subject heading would be required. I was wondering if anyone is aware of such dataset existing online. Regards, Arash
[CODE4LIB] Test
The Code4lib list server has a bug. When I send an email to the list, it gets forwarded to the members of the list with my email address in the FROM header. Email to OCLC goes through Postini and Postini clearly recognizes that an email originating from ND.EDU is not email from OCLC and rejects it. This means not only that other OCLC employees never see my posts, but also the list server counts those rejected emails and after some threshold the members who reject those emails get unsubscribed from the list. I've whined about this in the past. I've also raised it as an issue within OCLC and our email folks are going to work with the LSoft folks (the maker of the list server) to solve the problem. As a first step, I'm sending this message to the list. There will probably be a few more. I beg your patience. Ralph
