How does this compare to Zetoc at Mimas, which also provides RSS feeds
for journal ToCs?
Rob
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009, Boheemen, Peter van wrote:
This is great !!! But don't forget the API !
Peter
-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of
I'll do my best to clarify the differences between Zetoc and ticTOCs, as best
as I understand them:
Zetoc covers about 20,000 journals, including journals that are print-only, or
that exist online but do not provide their own RSS feeds
ticTOCs covers about 12,000, limited to journals that
Thanks Terry, a really good comparison!
One more that I came up with, in thinking about this slightly further
... ticTOCs is open to the public whereas ZETOC requires an
institutional login to access the data. A big plus on ticTOCs' side!
Rob
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009, Bucknell, Terry wrote:
I knew there was something I forgot to mention!
Terry
-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of Dr R.
Sanderson
Sent: 12 February 2009 11:58
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] ticTOCs makes its data available to
I was one of the developers and primary maintainer for severals years
for a TOC services at Cornell that was created about 5 years ago. The
UI is pretty dated but it still is used quite a bit although it does
note produce an RSS feed. It's only available to Cornell patrons
because it's
I hadn't known about Zetoc either! How did I miss that?
They both seem very useful.
One of the tricks with using ticTOCs, is that the RSS feeds (provided by
the publisher) may include links to article full text that may or may
not be accessible to any given institution's patrons, depending
Doh, is Zetoc not free? Nevermind my excitement about it in that case. :)
Jonathan
Dr R. Sanderson wrote:
Thanks Terry, a really good comparison!
One more that I came up with, in thinking about this slightly further
... ticTOCs is open to the public whereas ZETOC requires an
institutional
MARC was registered a long time ago.
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2220.html
Some of the text is a bit dated and could stand some updating.
Patrick is right that an XML schema such as MODS or MARCXML would be text/xml.
Rebecca
Rebecca S. Guenther
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Cloutman, David
dclout...@co.marin.ca.us wrote:
The results were pretty lopsided:
Unnamed: 8
Zend: 11
CakePHP: 4
Symfony: 4
Code Igniter: 2
Interestingly, these numbers match up pretty well with what Google
Trends shows for 2008:
I also notice that doing a search on amazon.com gives me the following
counts on books devoted to the frameworks you found. I did an advanced
search for php as a keyword and the framework name in the title. Zend
results for other Zend products (PHP cert training and Zend Studio) were
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 21:43, Rebecca S Guenther r...@loc.gov wrote:
Patrick is right that an XML schema such as MODS or MARCXML would be text/xml.
I would strongly advise against text/xml, as it is an oxymoron (text
is not XML XML is not text even if it is delivered through a text
protocol),
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of
Alexander Johannesen
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 4:00 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] MIME Type for MARC, Mods, etc.?
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 21:43, Rebecca S Guenther r...@loc.gov wrote:
Didn't we finish having this conversation last week? We talked about all
this stuff being brought up now last week.
Andrew, for why marc+xml is appropriate, see RFC 3023.
I am completely confident that application/marc+xml would be the right
type to register for (eg) MARC XML , and that until
Cloutman, David wrote:
This morning I was curious to see how the battle for domination between
PHP frameworks was shaping up, and which one was most economically
sensible for a developer with limited time to learn. I thought I'd share
my results with the list, as this may be of interest to some
If your institution uses EZproxy then you can of course link to ticTOCs via
EZproxy and you should find that full-text articles are then available to your
patrons (where entitled of course). That's what we do at Liverpool.
If your institution has configured a LibX toolbar and the publisher's
Interesting link.
I've played with Symfony, and like what I see. I even own the Apress
book. I'm certainly not saying Zend is better than framework X. My
question is, will knowing it give you an edge in an interview for a PHP
job v. something else? That I'm not so certain about. What is pretty
Bucknell, Terry wrote:
If your institution uses EZproxy then you can of course link to ticTOCs via
EZproxy and you should find that full-text articles are then available to your
patrons (where entitled of course). That's what we do at Liverpool.
It's the where entitled that is the sticking
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 22:32, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu wrote:
Didn't we finish having this conversation last week? We talked about all
this stuff being brought up now last week.
We did indeed, and your summary is better than what my retort could
have been; spot on.
I guess it's hard
Actually, re-reading some of the RFCs, I would clarify one thing.
It seems like using unregistered x- MIME type is discouraged, and
instead you are encouraged to use what is (claimed to be) a very quick
and easy and painless process of registering vnd. types. So I'd
encourage LC to
Hello, this thread was recently brought to my attention. (And then it took
longer than it should have to get subscribed to this list. And I haven't
seen an archive so I don't know if there has been any discussion beyond 2/4.
Anyway )
We (LC) decided a year ago to register mime types for
Alexander Johannesen wrote:
One question we haven't asked is if we really need a MIME type for MARCXML. :)
PPS: Yes, it has been asked, and it's pretty obvious to me that we do.
Because I write lots of software that will be fetching MARCXML from the
web, and needs to know what it's got.
On 2/11/09 5:11 PM, Bucknell, Terry t.d.buckn...@liverpool.ac.uk wrote:
We are working on creating APIs to let groups like the code4lib community
extract our data in more flexible ways, but it has been pointed out to us -
see
22 matches
Mail list logo