On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 12:00 AM, Tim Spalding t...@librarything.com wrote:
While the new draft is written in a much friendlier tone, and even has
some improvements, it also takes away concrete rights that libraries
had in the earlier drafts, including the right to consider fully
theirs
Quoting Ed Summers e...@pobox.com:
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 12:00 AM, Tim Spalding t...@librarything.com wrote:
While the new draft is written in a much friendlier tone, and even has
some improvements, it also takes away concrete rights that libraries
had in the earlier drafts, including the
I'm trying to get a handle on the new policy as compared to the old policy, and
what it really means. All in all, it seems much more vague than the first
draft, no longer trying to be an obligatory legal contract like the first
draft was -- in this way more similar to the old 1987 policy.
If
Quoting Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu:
If specific rights were taken out, this kind of makes sense --
becuase if the (first draft) policy says you CAN transfer your
original cataloging and non-OCLC records without permission, the
implication (or was it explicit?) was that you can
Version 6 of the Google Books Bibliography is now available
from Digital Scholarship.
http://digital-scholarship.org/gbsb/gbsb.htm
This bibliography presents over 310 selected
English-language articles and other works that are useful in
understanding Google Books. It primarily focuses on the
