Position Title: Analyst Programmer Intermediate
Type of Position: Regular Staff
Department Library
Duties: Reporting to the Web Services Librarian, the Analyst Programmer
develops, maintains, and troubleshoots web based applications in support of
University
Hi Andy,
LITA's peer-reviewed quarterly journal, is online and accessible to all
LITA members. Issues older than six months are open to all.
I can't say as I understand how restricting access to the articles benefits the
authors, LITA members, or the general public. Just out of curiosity,
Has anyone figured out a URL platform for the new Ulrich's platform at
https://ulrichsweb.serialssolutions.com
https://ulrichsweb.serialssolutions.com/, that allows direct linking
(aka deep linking) to a particular known ISSN record?
For use, for instance, with the SFX ulrich's target?
Someone recently on this list was saying something about ways to embed
facets in for instance Atom feeds.
I was reminded of that, because checking out an Atom feed from Google
Books Data API, in Internet Explorer... Internet Explorer displays
'facet' type restrictions for it, under a heading
-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf
Of
Jonathan Rochkind
[I agree that simply copying the Solr API for a standard like SRU is
not
the way to go -- Solr is an application that supports various
low-level
things that are not
I do not think Solr facets are over-engineered. Trying to hack away to
make Solr facets act kind of sort of like traditional browse search,
I'm using all the features that are there, and wish they had a few more
features -- in some ways they are 'under-engineered'.
I just think Solr facet
That's pretty cool, but I had to fire up Parallels on my Mac to see it in MSIE.
For those that may not have Windows readily available, this is what it looks
like:
http://twitpic.com/45r6sn
Peter
On Mar 3, 2011, at 1:51 PM, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
Someone recently on this list was saying
So that seems to just be using the atom:category element, which is
clever, but it wouldn't give you facet counts for the total results
set (just for the returned page).
It's possible to have categories across the entire result set (they'd
be at the feed level, rather than the entry level), but
