Koha Gruppo Italiano is pleased to announce that you can follow the conference
Italian lectures on semantic web and Linked Data: practical examples for
libraries via a streaming on
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZN9gEM0RmqE
starting from May 7th, 2014 9:00 AM (CET). Mostly in Italian.
The full
Thanks, Stefano. The time zone difference makes this pretty much
impossible for some of us. Will the talks be recorded for later viewing?
kc
On 5/6/14, 2:09 AM, Stefano Bargioni wrote:
Koha Gruppo Italiano is pleased to announce that you can follow the conference
Italian lectures on semantic
Metadata Librarian II
Cadence Group
Greenbelt, Maryland
Cadence Group seeks a self-motivated, detail-oriented, and innovative
individual for a full-time Metadata Librarian position. The successful
candidate will have experience creating and maintaining metadata, a solid
knowledge of established
Thanks Drew!
I have to admit I haven't had much time to sort through resources yet but am
definitely adding these to the list.
Arwen
-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Andrew
Gordon
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2014 12:05 PM
To:
No.
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Dan Chudnov daniel.chud...@gmail.comwrote:
Is it time to reconsider: should we start a separate list for Job:
postings? code4lib-jobs, perhaps?
-Dan
--
Sent from my GMail account.
No
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Devon dec...@gmail.com wrote:
No.
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Dan Chudnov daniel.chud...@gmail.comwrote:
Is it time to reconsider: should we start a separate list for Job:
postings? code4lib-jobs, perhaps?
-Dan
--
Sent from my GMail
This comes up all the time, and always it's no. For anyone who
doesn't like the job postings, use email filters.
-Wilhelmina
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Dan Chudnov daniel.chud...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it time to reconsider: should we start a separate list for Job:
postings?
Associate Consultant, bepress Consulting Services
bepress
Berkeley
We are looking for an associate consultant to support the students, faculty
and scholars who we serve with our online solutions.
_Responsibilities_
* Collaborating with university faculty and librarians to launch new
Thanks to everyone for the conversation re: barriers to open metadata. Your
feedback is really helpful!
Laura
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 7:27 AM, Karen Coyle li...@kcoyle.net wrote:
On 4/30/14, 9:19 PM, Chad Nelson wrote:
If libraries aren't willing to put in the the effort to make their own
Not to be a jerk about this, but why is the answer always No? There seem to
be more posts on this list relating to job openings than there are relating to
code discussions. Are job postings a part why this list was originally created?
If so, I'll stop now.
Then again, perhaps as a group we
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Richard Sarvas richard.sar...@lib.uconn.edu
wrote:
Not to be a jerk about this, but why is the answer always No? There seem
to be more posts on this list relating to job openings than there are
relating to code discussions. Are job postings a part why this list
No.
Junior Tidal
Assistant Professor
Web Services and Multimedia Librarian
New York City College of Technology, CUNY
300 Jay Street, Rm A434
Brooklyn, NY 11201
718.260.5481
http://library.citytech.cuny.edu
Dan Chudnov daniel.chud...@gmail.com 5/6/2014 12:34 PM
Is it time to reconsider:
No
-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Edward
M. Corrado
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2014 12:38 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] separate list for jobs
No
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Devon dec...@gmail.com
I also vote NO. I want so see first hand what the marketable skills are
that I should be acquiring. I can always delete the ones that are way above my
head, but at least I've some idea what terms to look up!
JJ
-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries
No.
The sender is j...@code4lib.org, so that makes email filters super easy ;-).
- Original Message -
From: Dan Chudnov daniel.chud...@gmail.com
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2014 12:34:31 PM
Subject: [CODE4LIB] separate list for jobs
Is it time to reconsider:
I agree as well - I've always been taught to always keep your eye on the
job market, even if you are gainfully and happily employed. You also never
know when a friend or colleague may be a good fit for a job you see on C4L.
So, I enjoy the job posts and if you don't want to read them, the
There is another benefit in addition to, skills should I cultivate. There
is a follow-the-money factor. Declaring I'm for Linked Data is one thing.
Putting Linked Data in a job title is something far more significant.
Since code4lib is not always boast4lib-ish, it would be too great a loss to
not
what jobs emails? I haven't seen one of those since I started on this list
=P
I agree that a simple filter works perfectly well, and the lower number of
mailing list people have to subscribe to, the better
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Kate Kosturski librariankate7...@gmail.com
wrote:
I
Lead System Administrator
ProQuest
Seattle, Wa
As a **Principal System Administrator** at ProQuest, you will be an integral
part of a highly focused team responsible for maintaining and supporting
multi-tiered applications that enable librarians, academic researchers, and
vendors to
Sr. Program Manager - Operations
ProQuest
Seattle, Wa
Are you passionate about technology?
Can you juggle multiple projects while herding cats?
Does working with multiple teams to resolve issues in an agile work
environment excite you?
Then we're interest in talking to you!
We're
DevOps Engineer
ProQuest
Mountain View, CA
We're looking for a **DevOps Enginee**r who will be focusing on Linux and IP
networking. You'll be working with a great team supporting
an enterprise SaaS environment. You'll have the ability to
work on projects that include supporting greenfield
Associate Head, Academic Technology
North Carolina State University
Raleigh
**NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES**
VACANCY ANNOUNCEMENT
Associate Head, Academic Technology (New Position)
The NCSU Libraries has a well-earned reputation for creating adventurous
library spaces and
Very well then, carry on with the job postings.
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Steve
Meyer
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2014 1:34 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] separate list for jobs
There is another
How do you manage to filter out those who feel their job is worthy of cross
posting without using jobs@code4lib I've yet to get around to making a smarter
filter to deal with those.
Carrick Rogers
Revs Infrastructure Developer
210 Meyer Library, Stanford, CA
carri...@stanford.edu
-
smime.p7m
Description: S/MIME encrypted message
Sr. Architect DevOps
ProQuest
Ann Arbor, MI
ProQuest is seeking a** Senior Architect - DevOps**
This person is responsible for software/platform infrastructure and
deployment. At ProQuest we need to create a strong DevOps
team to lead our configuration management and release platform. You
On 05/07/2014 04:59 AM, Richard Sarvas wrote:
Not to be a jerk about this, but why is the answer always No? There seem to
be more posts on this list relating to job openings than there are relating to code
discussions. Are job postings a part why this list was originally created? If so, I'll
How do you manage to filter out those who feel their job is worthy of
cross posting without using jobs@code4lib ?
To me this is a strong argument for keeping the Code4Lib job posting
as-is. For the postings that come through http://jobs.code4lib.org/ ,
people can filter with 100% accuracy. If
Actually, I am not complaining. I am just wondering why I am receiving so may
job postings on a list serve that I though was supposed to be relating to
Code4Lib conferences and coding in library environments. Had the list been
called Code4LibJobs I suspect I never would have asked the question
mostly because every time this topic comes up people simply respond No
without explaining why.
Since I was one of the first to respond with a bare no, let me explain
why.
Dan didn't seed the discussion in any way. He asked a yes or no question -
is it time to reconsider a jobs only list.
I rarely post anything to this list because honestly I'm not qualified in
most cases. For this, however, I'm qualified. While I didn't see the
initial question, I've figured it through its replies.
Some of those responses have been pretty disheartening. While most of what
goes through this
I vote no the separation, even though I am a high school student I still enjoy
reading the postings and seeing what jobs are out there, people with solid jobs
likely agree with me 100%, plus it lets me know what type of degree(s) I may
need in this field!
Riley Childs
Junior
IT Admin
email:
Suggestion: What if we had a daily digest? Instead of a blast evrytime a new
job is posted why not do a daily digest of all posted jobs? Or we could say
after there have been 12 jobs posted send a digest with those 12 jobs?
Riley Childs
Junior
IT Admin
email: rchi...@cucawarriors.com
office: +1
Riley,
That sounds like a good idea.
+1 from me.
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Riley Childs rchi...@cucawarriors.comwrote:
Suggestion: What if we had a daily digest? Instead of a blast evrytime a
new job is posted why not do a daily digest of all posted jobs? Or we could
say after there
On May 6, 2014, at 12:34 PM, Dan Chudnov wrote:
Is it time to reconsider: should we start a separate list for Job:
postings? code4lib-jobs, perhaps?
I think the real question here is if we should have a separate list for
discussing if we need a separate list for jobs. I propose
It's not conversation though, it's more like broadcast. Surely I don't have to
explain on this particular list why this channel is not the perfect broadcast
outlet.
Further, it's quite distinct subject matter.
Let me not generalise about librarians, but don't these ideas resonate?:
*
Ha ha---yes! exactly.
On 5/6/14, 6:13 PM, Joe Hourcle onei...@grace.nascom.nasa.gov wrote:
On May 6, 2014, at 12:34 PM, Dan Chudnov wrote:
Is it time to reconsider: should we start a separate list for Job:
postings? code4lib-jobs, perhaps?
I think the real question here is if we should have
37 matches
Mail list logo
