at http://groups.google.com/group/memento-dev/.
On behalf of the Memento team:
Herbert Van de Sompel - Los Alamos National Laboratory
Michael L. Nelson - Old Dominion University
Robert Sanderson - Los Alamos National Laboratory
Depends on the sort of features required, in particular the access
patterns, and the hardware it's going to run on.
In my experience, NoSQL systems (for example apache's Cassandra) have
extremely good distribution properties over multiple machines, much
better than SQL databases. Essentially,
Exposing the records as Linked Data, rather than just plain old XML
would be an interesting demonstration of how the library world can
generate and, more importantly, curate massive amounts of data. They
could then be linked to and from by other resources/services -- for
example linking a copy of
Dear all,
The Open Annotation Collaboration (OAC) project is pleased to announce
an open call for statements of interest in participating in the Using
the OAC Model for Annotation Interoperability Workshop. The workshop
will be held 24-25 March 20011 in Chicago, IL and will provide an in-
depth
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 1:28 PM, BRIAN TINGLE brian.tingle.cdlib.org@
gmail.com wrote:
graph processing stack on top of a graph database resonates with me more
than RDF store with SPARQL access but I guess they are
basically/functionally saying the same thing? Maybe the graph database
way
That is (still) incorrect.
A single schema may contain multiple namespaces, and there isn't a
unique identifier for a schema. For example, any simple Dublin Core
based syntax must have at least two Namespaces, Dublin Core and the
wrapper element. SchemaLocation is not unique as there can be many
Forwarded:
The Open Annotation Collaboration (OAC) project is pleased to announce
a Request For Proposal to collaborate with OAC researchers for
building implementations of the OAC data model and ontology. The OAC
is seeking to collaborate with scholars and/or librarians currently
using and/or
-- Forwarded message --
From: Christine McWebb cmcw...@uwaterloo.ca
Date: Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 7:36 AM
Subject: [dm-l] Postdoctoral Fellowship at MARGOT, University of Waterloo
To: d...@uleth.ca
University of Waterloo – Mellon Postdoctoral Fellowship in Digital Humanities
With
Our work on Memento comes to mind, of course.
http://www.mementoweb.org/
And in particular, regarding the second point, our papers about the
use of Memento for non-traditional interactions with web archives:
* http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.3661
Using Memento to recover the state of a web resource
Dear all,
We have published an updated internet draft for the Memento
specification concerning Time Travel on the Web.
It is available at:
* TXT version: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-vandesompel-memento-01.txt
* HTML version: http://mementoweb.org/guide/rfc/ID/
This version contains updates
Without /any/ infrastructure it would be a challenge, but a simple
database that has timestamps and basic metadata would be sufficient.
The timestamps are the most important, obviously, to populate the feed
correctly and handle the time slicing.
Rob
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 8:55 AM, Eric Lease
LibLime
A Division of PTFS, Inc.
Main Office
11501 Huff Court
North Bethesda, Maryland 20895
tel: (301) 654-8088 Ext. 127
fax: (301) 654-5789
email: kohai...@liblime.com
Twitter: @liblime
How about we all contact them? ;)
Rob
2011/11/23 Wilfred Drew dr...@tc3.edu:
Has anybody contacted the
Here's some off the top of my head:
* Separation of concerns -- You can keep your server side data
transfer and change the front end easily by working with the
javascript, rather than reworking both.
* Lax Security -- It's easier to get into trouble when you're simply
inlining HTML received,
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 9:14 AM, BRIAN TINGLE
brian.tingle.cdlib@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 7, 2011, at 2:19 PM, Robert Sanderson wrote:
* Lax Security -- It's easier to get into trouble when you're simply
inlining HTML received, compared to building the elements. Getting
into the same bad
You might consider the Content in RDF specification:
http://www.w3.org/TR/Content-in-RDF10/
which describes how to do this in a generic fashion, as opposed to
stuffing it directly into a string literal.
HTH
Rob
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Ethan Gruber ewg4x...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
+1
Rob
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 9:26 AM, aj...@virginia.edu aj...@virginia.edu wrote:
My inclination would be to keep the descriptive snippets in some kind of
content store with a good RESTful Web exposure and just use those URLs as the
values of description triples in your RDF. Then your
I guess that you need to be logged in to vote?
Perhaps a direct link in the text to where to login, and where to request a
new account?
Thanks,
Rob
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Becky Yoose b.yo...@gmail.com wrote:
Not a voting problem per se, but the results page in IE9 [1] in Win7
+1, of course :)
You might wish to consider some further derivatives/related pages:
http://www.diglib.org/about/code-of-conduct/
http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Friendly_space_policy
https://thestrangeloop.com/about/policies
Dear all,
We are delighted to be able to announce the availability of the beta
Memento extension for Chrome. The extension is available in the Chrome
store:
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/memento/jgbfpjledahoajcppakbgilmojkaghgm?hl=engl=US
Below, we include the description that
You're still missing a vital step.
Currently your assertion is that the creator /of a web page/ is Jefferson,
which is clearly false.
The page (...) is a transcription of the Declaration of Independence.
The Declaration of Independence is written by Jefferson.
Jefferson is Male.
And it's not
Yes, I'm going to get sucked into this vi vs emacs argument for nostalgia's
sake.
From the linked, very outdated article:
In fact, as far as I know I've never used an RDF application, nor do I
know of any that make me want to use them. So what's wrong with this
picture?
a) Nothing. You
Hi Andrew,
Not exactly sure what sort of differences you're after...
Do you mean the difference between this:
http://iipimage.sourceforge.net/documentation/protocol/
(and it's 74 page reference: http://iipimage.sourceforge.net/IIPv105.pdf )
And this:
(posted in the comments on the blog and reposted here for further
discussion, if interest)
While I couldn't agree more with the post's starting point -- URIs identify
(concepts) and use HTTP as your API -- I couldn't disagree more with the
use content negotiation conclusion.
I'm with Dan Cohen
Hi Richard,
On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Richard Wallis
richard.wal...@dataliberate.com wrote:
It's harder to implement Content Negotiation than your own API, because
you
get to define your own API whereas you have to follow someone else's rules
Don't wish your implementation problems on
On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Barnes, Hugh hugh.bar...@lincoln.ac.nzwrote:
+1 to all of Richard's points here. Making something easier for you to
develop is no justification for making it harder to consume or deviating
from well supported standards.
I'm not suggesting deviating from well
To be (more) controversial...
If it's okay to require headers, why can't API keys go in a header rather
than the URL.
Then it's just the same as content negotiation, it seems to me. You send a
header and get a different response from the same URI.
Rob
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Edward
For what it's worth, the latest wayback code is:
https://github.com/iipc/openwayback
And being developed by the IIPC consortium, rather than just the Internet
Archive alone.
It has many additional features, contributed by other members.
It should be used in preference to the sourceforge
at 12:17 PM, L Snider lsni...@gmail.com wrote:
Rob is right on! I included the wrong link, thanks for catching that...
Cheers
Lisa
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Robert Sanderson azarot...@gmail.com
wrote:
For what it's worth, the latest wayback code is:
https
Have you considered the LOCAH work in mapping EAD into Linked Data?
http://archiveshub.ac.uk/locah/
and
http://data.archiveshub.ac.uk/
Rob
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 5:10 PM, Ben Companjen
ben.compan...@dans.knaw.nlwrote:
Hi Eric,
While I'm no archivist by training (information systems
P166123464771
And now no one understands at all. CIDOC-CRM has taken the same approach
-- it's better that everyone is equal in their non-comprehension than
people who speak a particular language are somehow advantaged.
BTW, as an English speaker, I also don't understand other designation
Hi Jon,
To present the other side of the argument so that others on the list can
make an informed decision...
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Jon Phipps jphi...@madcreek.com wrote:
I've developed a quite strong opinion that vocabulary developers should not
_ever_ think that they can
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 7:56 AM, Jon Phipps jphi...@madcreek.com wrote:
Hi Rob, the conversation continues below...
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Robert Sanderson azarot...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Jon,
To present the other side of the argument so that others on the list can
make
(Sorry for a previous empty message)
Hi Jon,
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 7:56 AM, Jon Phipps jphi...@madcreek.com wrote:
Hi Rob, the conversation continues below...
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Robert Sanderson azarot...@gmail.com
wrote:
To present the other side of the argument so
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 6:20 AM, Jon Phipps jphi...@madcreek.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Robert Sanderson azarot...@gmail.com
wrote:
All in my opinion, and all debatable. I hope that your choice goes well
for
you,
I'd like to repeat: just because I agree
34 matches
Mail list logo
