Re: [CODE4LIB] Why does the MARC to DC crosswalk refuse to use Creator?

2011-04-25 Thread Luciano Ramalho
Thank you very much Rebecca, Karen and Esme for your replies. It is really a privilege to be able to ask a question here and get answers like these. Regarding the DC Creator issue, I probably nave a different perspective on DC than many here, because my first contact with DC was not as a librarian

Re: [CODE4LIB] Why does the MARC to DC crosswalk refuse to use Creator?

2011-04-25 Thread Guenther, Rebecca
The reason we used DC Contributor instead of Creator is because the semantics do not map well to MARC creators/contributors. Creators in MARC can be in 1XX and 7XX; since 1XX is not repeatable, additional creators go in 7XX. Contributors in Dublin Core play a secondary role in the resource ("An

Re: [CODE4LIB] Why does the MARC to DC crosswalk refuse to use Creator?

2011-04-18 Thread Karen Coyle
I don't actually know why, but I can imagine a plausible answer: the MARC record does not distinguish between contributors and creators sufficiently well to separate out the x00 fields between them. Either everyone is a creator, or everyone is a contributor, or the main entry (100) is treat

Re: [CODE4LIB] Why does the MARC to DC crosswalk refuse to use Creator?

2011-04-18 Thread Cowles, Esme
It looks like it's using Contributor instead. So I'm guessing the sticking point is that it's hard to figure out what Contributors are primary, so it's safer to just punt and put them all in Contributor instead. -Esme -- Esme Cowles "During my service in the United States Congress, I took the