Hi Mo,
On 14/10/16 04:39 PM, Mo Zanaty (mzanaty) wrote:
> I would like to propose another option.
>
> 4) Add an informational note in the update draft that the codebase on
> opus-codec.org has diverged, and may continue to diverge, from the code in
> RFC 6716, without breaking normative
I would like to propose another option.
4) Add an informational note in the update draft that the codebase on
opus-codec.org has diverged, and may continue to diverge, from the code in
RFC 6716, without breaking normative bitstream compatibility.
This option seems sufficient and lightweight.
Mo
