Re: [Coder-Com] Suggestion

2001-05-01 Thread Mark Foster
Perhaps then set (if not already done) the ability to include a module which contains those changes? As opposed to beefing up deployed Undernet ircU with stuff we dont use? :P - Original Message - From: "Perry Lorier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "n3tguy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [Coder-Com] Protecting client servers -- er, how?

2001-05-01 Thread Perry Lorier
On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 08:35:35PM +0200, Lou Cephyr wrote: > Quite clear and understandeble, ofcourse such commands > should be removed, the thing is that STATS are used for > legit things by "advanced" users. Like: m, p, t, z, u. Isn't it > possible to allow the useage of these for users? > Te

Re: [Coder-Com] CNOTICE and CPRIVMSG

2001-05-01 Thread Kev
> Does using CNOTICE and CPRIVMSG really bypass the flood limit checking? > I had a game-bot flooded off repeatedly by flooders who got together to > ask the bot for playing instructions, which the bot gave out using > CNOTICE. CNOTICE and CPRIVMSG bypass the anti-spam checking, not the flood li

RE: [Coder-Com] CNOTICE and CPRIVMSG

2001-05-01 Thread Joseph Bongaarts
> Does using CNOTICE and CPRIVMSG really bypass the flood limit checking? > I had a game-bot flooded off repeatedly by flooders who got together to > ask the bot for playing instructions, which the bot gave out using > CNOTICE. They bypass the limits on the number of different targets that can be

[Coder-Com] CNOTICE and CPRIVMSG

2001-05-01 Thread D. Sen
Does using CNOTICE and CPRIVMSG really bypass the flood limit checking? I had a game-bot flooded off repeatedly by flooders who got together to ask the bot for playing instructions, which the bot gave out using CNOTICE. Here is the quote from your documents project website: " It is now possible t

Re: [Coder-Com] Protecting client servers -- er, how?

2001-05-01 Thread Lou Cephyr
Quite clear and understandeble, ofcourse such commands should be removed, the thing is that STATS are used for legit things by "advanced" users. Like: m, p, t, z, u. Isn't it possible to allow the useage of these for users? A. Green - Original Message - From: "Perry Lorier" <[EMAIL PRO

Re: [Coder-Com] Suggestion

2001-05-01 Thread Perry Lorier
On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 01:51:51PM +0300, n3tguy wrote: > Well let's consider that some other networks uses ircu as their server > software and NOT only undernet. > In general I'm open to helping other networks with what they do, I obviously won't go out of my way to help them, but if theres a r

Re: [Coder-Com] Suggestion

2001-05-01 Thread n3tguy
Well let's consider that some other networks uses ircu as their server software and NOT only undernet. --n3tguy - Original Message - From: Must Have Been A Wild Angel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: n3tguy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 11:27 AM Subject: Re: [Coder-Com] Suggesti

Re: [Coder-Com] Suggestion

2001-05-01 Thread rob
- Original Message - From: "n3tguy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 7:51 AM Subject: [Coder-Com] Suggestion >When someone tries to kill, kick, deop +k users (services) reply > Cannot kill, kick or deop channel service. >It should be changed because

Re: [Coder-Com] Suggestion

2001-05-01 Thread Mark Foster
Well, either that, or we can note that the only services available to users on Undernet are channel services. I dont think we need to paraphrase for the opers themselves (the only ones likely to be able to kill oper services? theyre never opped/in channels long enough to be kicked) At 09:51 1/05/