Re: [Coder-Com] Nonident Banning

2001-08-27 Thread Greg Sikorski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 28/08/2001 00:03:41: > /msg x ban #england *!*~@*.net 333 100 Non-Ident Ban. Reduce Abuse - > Floodnets ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > > [00:01] -X- The ban *!*~@*.net is already covered by *!*~@*.* > [00:01] *** chonchi (~[EMAIL PROTECTED]) has > joined #england > [00:02] ***

Re: [Coder-Com] Nonident Banning

2001-08-27 Thread Dave C.
For that ban to work, you'd need *!~*@*.net not *!*~@*.net For the ban you mention below, the ~ would have to be the LAST character in the ident, not the first, and it's always the first :) Hope this helped... Dave At 12:03 AM 8/28/01 +0100, you wrote: >/msg x ban #england *!*~@*.net 333 1

[Coder-Com] Nonident Banning

2001-08-27 Thread Shaun O'keefe
/msg x ban #england *!*~@*.net 333 100 Non-Ident Ban. Reduce Abuse - Floodnets ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [00:01] -X- The ban *!*~@*.net is already covered by *!*~@*.* [00:01] *** chonchi (~[EMAIL PROTECTED]) has joined #england [00:02] *** jasmina1 (~[EMAIL PROTECTED]) has joined #england People still

Re: [Coder-Com] X oddity

2001-08-27 Thread Jonathan Slivko
Kev, There is one slight difference between a whois and a whowas. If you look at the snippet from mIRC, it says X *is*, not X was. Hence, X was online. While X may have just split off then, it's not likely. Just wanted to point that out. -- Jonathan BTW, AFAIK, mIRC does NOT turn /whois into

Re: [Coder-Com] X oddity

2001-08-27 Thread Kev
> [16:03] -> X is [EMAIL PROTECTED] * For help type: /msg X showcommands > X using *.undernet.org The Undernet Underworld > x End of /WHOIS list. > - > [16:03] -> *[EMAIL PROTECTED]* login blah blah > - > [EMAIL PROTECTED] No such nick > - > -> [x] PING > - > x No such nic

[Coder-Com] X oddity

2001-08-27 Thread Py Fivestones
[16:03] -> X is [EMAIL PROTECTED] * For help type: /msg X showcommands X using *.undernet.org The Undernet Underworld x End of /WHOIS list. - [16:03] -> *[EMAIL PROTECTED]* login blah blah - [EMAIL PROTECTED] No such nick - -> [x] PING - x No such nick Why does a /whois X

Re: [Coder-Com] MaxChanBans

2001-08-27 Thread Perry Lorier
On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 09:31:20AM +0100, Shaun O'keefe wrote: > Guys, > > Any chance in the next release we can extend the maxchan bans from 30 to > something like 50 ? > Undernet has a limit of about 1k per channel of state it tries to save. If we up this then it means more memory used on al

[Coder-Com] MaxChanBans

2001-08-27 Thread Shaun O'keefe
Guys, Any chance in the next release we can extend the maxchan bans from 30 to something like 50 ? Regards Simba