> eh looks like it. Like Kev said, its indeed a bug.
>
> [21:37] *** edd ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) has joined #
> [21:37] *** Hidden sets mode: +b uh2!*@*
> [21:37] *** Nick change: edd > uh2 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> [21:37] bleh
> [21:37] *** uh2 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) has left # (Cycling)
It
eh looks like it. Like Kev said, its indeed a bug.
[21:37] *** edd ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) has joined #
[21:37] *** Hidden sets mode: +b uh2!*@*
[21:37] *** Nick change: edd > uh2 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
[21:37] bleh
[21:37] *** uh2 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) has left # (Cycling)
(Script/21:37:55)
On Mon, 25 Mar 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> /me was wrong ?
Yes - the question had nothing to do with X.
--
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.shad0w.org.uk/
/me was wrong ?
> oh X is in the ircu now? isn't that a bug though, since technically the user
> is banned. thanks though.
X is not (yet) in the ircu, but even if it were, this would not affect the
ban code too terribly much.
--
Kevin L. Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> X only check on join he doesnt check channel every time , so if the user join
> with another nick than the one who is sets on X , X wont reconize him . and
> if u want a solution for that , ban the *!*user@host that would be better
I didn't think the question had anything to do with X. Thi
oh X is in the ircu now? isn't that a bug though, since technically the user
is banned. thanks though.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 10:15 PM
Subject: Re: [Coder-Com] nick/ban/evade
> X only c
X only check on join he doesnt check channel every time , so if the user join
with another nick than the one who is sets on X , X wont reconize him . and
if u want a solution for that , ban the *!*user@host that would be better
friendly NeoWatch
hi,
sorry if this question has been asked a thousand times:
a nick is banned in a channel, the user changes their nick to evade it, once
in the channel they change it back to the banned nick and are still able to
talk.
is this normal?
thanks,
paul
