Chris Crowther écrit:
> On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, Jean-Edouard BABIN wrote:
>
> > But when I launch it, both port are closed (but the server run)
> > Anyboldy has an idea ? It's a bug ?
>
> You actually expect highly alpha code to work?
why not ? i use the developement version since start of
On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, Jean-Edouard BABIN wrote:
> But when I launch it, both port are closed (but the server run)
> Anyboldy has an idea ? It's a bug ?
You actually expect highly alpha code to work? And yes it's a
bug, I have the same problem (which is a pain when you're trying to do
some
Hi,
I have updated my .12 folder from cvs, do a new conf file..
With
Port {
server = no;
port = 4400;
};
Port { port = 6668; };
But when I launch it, both port are closed (but the server run)
Anyboldy has an idea ? It's a bug ?
--
Jean-Edouard BABIN
Mail : [EMAIL PROTECT
Hello,
I got a suggestion for you. When a user is added to a channel, X should send
a notification to the user added and to the channel manager, so he/she knows
the addition and aprove/disaprove it.
Regards,
Andreas Louca (a.k.a n3tguy),
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, Larry wrote:
> its not any actual host provided by unet, but they use similiar
> type host to trick/manilpulate people.
We know, the opers are also not allowed to do anything about them
unless they have proof they're being used to manipulate people; you can't
just ban
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 11:38:46AM +0200, Tom Rons wrote:
> Well, as far as I know, Carlo's intent with the original P10 specification
> (which theoretically allows for 4096 clients per server and 64 servers per
> network) was to limit the size of the network, as it would split when it
> became to
> Perhaps Undernet would be more stable and in otherwise better shape if you
> were still in charge. I bet we could reach over 100k users with your help!
Well, as far as I know, Carlo's intent with the original P10 specification
(which theoretically allows for 4096 clients per server and 64 serve
