Re: [Coder-Com] Ircu 2.10.12 configuration

2002-04-10 Thread Kev
> > You actually expect highly alpha code to work? > why not ? i use the developement version since start of .11 (when it was an > alpha) and i rarely see it not work at all (i may have chance :)) BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHhahahahahahahahahHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAhahahahahah!!! HTH, HAND. -- K

[Coder-Com] Re:

2002-04-10 Thread Braden Temme
Brian, We had a little bit of a problem with flooding clients who used proxys. The channel is now open for business again :c) Regards, Braden --- "Brian A. Cline" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ack, is #coder-com completely closed to ALL *!~*@* users now? > > -- > Brian A. Cline <[EMAIL PROTEC

RE: [Coder-Com] FW: X's unban... is that a bug?

2002-04-10 Thread pzl
The Difference between a bug and a feature exists in the eye of the user. Nobody is going to win this pointless argument. Now that we all understand the problem, lets move on :) pzl -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Empus Sent: Wednesday,

[Coder-Com] Re: your mail

2002-04-10 Thread Jeekay
My apologies. That ban was added to deal with a load of idiot flooders and I forgot to take it back off - it has been removed now. GK On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Brian A. Cline wrote: > Ack, is #coder-com completely closed to ALL *!~*@* users now? > > -- > Brian A. Cline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >

Re: [Coder-Com] FW: X's unban... is that a bug?

2002-04-10 Thread Valcor
>From what I just re-read, X removed the ban from the channel (which as an OP, you have sufficient access to remove), but not from the X ban database, which was set at a higher level. [13:43] -X- You have insufficient access to remove the ban *!*@dialup-65.57.34.26.Dial1.Phoenix1.Le

RE: [Coder-Com] FW: X's unban... is that a bug?

2002-04-10 Thread Empus
But X did *NOT* notify me that I could not remove the ban in X. It said it removed the ban, when in actual fact, it did not. X should not notify a user that a ban is removed, unless that ban is able to be, and is, removed. And if it is removing the channel ban, rather than the one in X's db banl

[no subject]

2002-04-10 Thread Brian A. Cline
Ack, is #coder-com completely closed to ALL *!~*@* users now? -- Brian A. Cline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

FW: [Coder-Com] FW: X's unban... is that a bug?

2002-04-10 Thread Empus
damnit.. Clicked reply and went to Iso directly. *oops* Sorry for getting it twice Iso. =) -Original Message- From: Empus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 6:46 PM To: Isomer Subject: RE: [Coder-Com] FW: X's unban... is that a bug? Iso, But *BOTH* bans

Re: [Coder-Com] FW: X's unban... is that a bug?

2002-04-10 Thread Michael Bordignon
maybe it removes it from the chan but not the db.. mick - Original Message - From: "Empus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 1:47 PM Subject: [Coder-Com] FW: X's unban... is that a bug? > ack, I sent this e-mail to early, thinking that it *did

Re: [Coder-Com] FW: X's unban... is that a bug?

2002-04-10 Thread Richard Smith
this has not changed since the old X... you have enough access to remove the ban on the channel but not enough access to remove the ban in X, result, X removes the channel, but notify's you that you cannot remove the ban in X. -- Richard T Smith - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Technician, Media Design Schoo

Re: [Coder-Com] FW: X's unban... is that a bug?

2002-04-10 Thread Isomer
> ack, I sent this e-mail to early, thinking that it *did* remove the ban. > However, it did not, a couple of minutes later: > > What's going on?! The bans were placed with an access higher than yours. You then tried to remove it and couldn't, but X let you unset the ban from the channel (since

RE: [Coder-Com] X's unban... is that a bug?

2002-04-10 Thread David Richards
what i think is happening there. it is removing the channel ban. But you dont have access to remove it from X's banlist david > -Original Message- > From: Empus [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 2:45 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Coder-Com] X's