> *** Mode change [+b *!*@more.and.more.people.are.anti-bobskc.com] on
> #coder-com by X
> *** X has kicked OUTsider from #coder-com [(net) no explaination needed]
>
> I think everyone has the right to choose the host he wants, I don't think
> that notnet has a decent reason of even issueing thi
(snip)
> > There is also the problem that secondary server would be fine for leaf
> > servers, but what about hubs? It's for the hub that it would be the more
> > usefull, but it is also where problems begins: We have to be carefull to
> > avoid some sort of long term netbreak if 1 hub decide to j
At 22:55 11-4-2002, you wrote:
> > >The idea is to allow servers to establish a secondary network link. No
> > >messages (except PINGs) would go across the secondary link unless the
> > >primary link was broken. This is still a long way from a mesh-linked
> > >network, but might be an interestin
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, Alexander Maassen wrote:
> I think everyone has the right to choose the host he wants, I don't think
> that notnet has a decent reason of even issueing this ban at all.
It's upto channel ops who they kick and ban, they don't have to
justify those actions except to ot
> What about a network where there is many 1-2 sec lag between servers (an
> example). If, let say, 3 or 4 servers decide to 'jump' at the same time... I
> wont list all problem that could occur, but there is a need for a pre-jump
> (to the network and some sort of aknolegment after that) command
> >The idea is to allow servers to establish a secondary network link. No
> >messages (except PINGs) would go across the secondary link unless the
> >primary link was broken. This is still a long way from a mesh-linked
> >network, but might be an interesting enhancement.
>
> Might be, but it als
The fact of the matter is: an op has the right to kick, ban, whatever any
user they wish. I live with it - surely you can without whining about it.
NARF
Gavin Grieve
HeKTik @ UnderNet
- Original Message -
From: "Alexander Maassen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Frid
*** Mode change [+b *!*@more.and.more.people.are.anti-bobskc.com] on
#coder-com by X
*** X has kicked OUTsider from #coder-com [(net) no explaination needed]
I think everyone has the right to choose the host he wants, I don't think
that notnet has a decent reason of even issueing this ban at all.
begin quote from Kev on Apr 11, 2002:
> We would introduce a new command for unregistered connections to server
> ports--SECONDARY. We would also introduce a new server<->server command
> with the token SC. SC would be prefixed by the introducing server and
> would contain the same fields as a
If i may... there is another problem i see coming...
What about a network where there is many 1-2 sec lag between servers (an
example). If, let say, 3 or 4 servers decide to 'jump' at the same time... I
wont list all problem that could occur, but there is a need for a pre-jump
(to the network and
At 18:57 11-4-2002, you wrote:
>The idea is to allow servers to establish a secondary network link. No
>messages (except PINGs) would go across the secondary link unless the
>primary link was broken. This is still a long way from a mesh-linked
>network, but might be an interesting enhancement.
The idea is to allow servers to establish a secondary network link. No
messages (except PINGs) would go across the secondary link unless the
primary link was broken. This is still a long way from a mesh-linked
network, but might be an interesting enhancement.
We would introduce a new command fo
whenever i use /msg x access #chan user (+ all the
other options of the command) i get this reply
-X- Unable to retrieve response. Please contact a
cservice administrator.
Hello, I you mail to say yourselves a word. In fact, I think that would indeed be if
you developed a version of ircu futur with: svsnick, sethost, ect. cryptage of ip. It
would be really cool:)
thank to listen me. Good day
14 matches
Mail list logo
