>-Original Message-
>From: Kev [mailto:klmitch@;MIT.EDU]
>Sent: Sunday, October 20, 2002 11:40 PM
>To: Will Buckner (Wcc)
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [Coder-Com] Account Suggestion
>
>
>
>> I was thinking about this, and I came up with an idea as to
>host-hiding.
>> With the cu
--- The Storm Surfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> > I like this. Can you work up a quick patch that'll allow a user to
> -x
> > if the ACCOUNT is not set? You can go ahead and add a feature
> > (FEAT_AUTOHIDE or something) that causes users connecting to get +x
> by
> > default. (I suggest
> I was thinking about this, and I came up with an idea as to host-hiding.
> With the current system, there is always a chance to get the user's host
> by using a NOTIFY event (mIRC and similar clients) to send a WHOIS
> upon connection. Even if the client logs in by default on connect
> (not alw
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 02:42:41PM -0400, Kev wrote:
> > > Since it's working with X why not +x mode be a toggle in the X config
> > > for that user? Like X do the /mode +x on the user rather than the user
> > > if it ask X to be +x by default (+x would not be the default)
> > >
> > > This still le
begin quote from Michel Hubert on Oct 18, 2002:
> Since it's working with X why not +x mode be a toggle in the X config
> for that user? Like X do the /mode +x on the user rather than the user
> if it ask X to be +x by default (+x would not be the default)
>
> This still left the user to do it him
Since when can we have a server set usermodes ?
On Fri, 18 Oct 2002, [iso-8859-1] Michel Hubert wrote:
> --- Alex Badea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> >
> > I disagree with the umode +x behaviour. Imagine a client sends a /msgX
> > login and a /mode +x upon connection. What will usually happen
