* stoney` <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-12-06 18:06:58 -0500]:
> User-com is in the process of creating multi platform user scrips for use
> on Undernet. For more information. email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> stoney`
While this is technically true, the script is in such a major
pre-alpha right now that I
User-com is in the process of creating multi platform user scrips for use
on Undernet. For more information. email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
stoney`
At 08:09 AM 12/6/2002 -0500, you wrote:
That actually would be a good idea...along with something else I've seen
on other networks...
What if we created so
> That actually would be a good idea...along with something else I've seen
> on other networks...
>
> What if we created some in-channel op commands for "X" like...
> !kb (Kickban)
> !b (Ban)
> !k (Kick)
> !op (Set Op)
> !dop (Unset Op)
> !v (Voice)
> !dv (De-Voice)
> !ld (LockDown: Kicks everyone
He means, in other words, to let X control any channel it wants from the
outside instead of it actually being in the channel.
Wouldn't we have to change IRCd and the way Cservice runs stuff to do
that though?
- Necro
Sofie Van Tendeloo wrote:
What do you exactly mean with: 'move X off the cha
That actually would be a good idea...along with something else I've seen
on other networks...
What if we created some in-channel op commands for "X" like...
!kb (Kickban)
!b (Ban)
!k (Kick)
!op (Set Op)
!dop (Unset Op)
!v (Voice)
!dv (De-Voice)
!ld (LockDown: Kicks everyone that has no access abov
