On behalf on all #leb-Undernet Manager/Admins/Users, we wish a happy newyear
2003 to all our friends around the world.
http://leb-undernet.org
Happy NewYear
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
For other networks? So that other networks could add commands for
services instead of making people type in all that /msg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . It gets
annoying!
Now I know some have aliases that take care of that, but not everyone
can program th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> What if we made IRCu use less CPU space? There are still clients out there that have
>trouble with mIRC colors
CPU usage isn't the real issue here, its just about passing data unfiltered so the
clients can do with it as they please. Clients that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 30 Dec 2002 5:42 pm, you wrote:
> Now I know some have aliases that take care of that, but not everyone
> can program their client..It would just be a nice favor for us to
> possibly add that or something.
There's been discussion ab
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 30 Dec 2002 11:42 am, stoney` wrote:
> I couldn't reproduce the behavior using Mirc, it may be your script.
No, it's a bug as I've said, Kev has said and Perry has said. I fixed it in
.04.
> stoney`
- --
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowth
Coder-Com is a part of Undernet, and thus has no responsibility to code for
other networks. If other networks want to add features like the ones
proposed to their code, they can write their own patches.
-Colin
At 12:42 PM 12/30/2002 -0500, you wrote:
For other networks? So that other networks
Oh yeah :D
Chris Crowther wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 30 Dec 2002 10:51 am, Tom Scott wrote:
Yes! I have a follower ;-) Channel modes they are, but +o is a
usermode...Why can't it be a channelmode too? +i is both... (invite and
invisible)
+o is also
For other networks? So that other networks could add commands for
services instead of making people type in all that /msg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . It gets
annoying!
Now I know some have aliases that take care of that, but not everyone
can program their client..It would just be a nice favor for us
Eck..I guess we're losing some users then :(
- Necromncr
Chris Crowther wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 30 Dec 2002 10:47 am, you wrote:
Yeah but sometimes clients tend to lock up @ the sight of mIRC code
Screwy and badly written clients aren't our pro
So do you have any feature ideas? I'm making a patch right now for modes
and I'd love to add them in.
- Necromncr
Fre wrote:
When will you people get the message ?
Colours are a CLIENT thing and are therefor not suppose to be filtered by
the server.
If you don't like colours then simply have y
When will you people get the message ?
Colours are a CLIENT thing and are therefor not suppose to be filtered by
the server.
If you don't like colours then simply have your client strip them. What you
don't see won't bother you, right ?
Highly experienced coders have said several times it would u
How we can "make" ircu use less CPU? force it? Its a no-no :)
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Andreas Louca" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 12:49 PM
Subject: Re: [Coder-Com] New Mode Ideas..should I include them
FROM : Mrs. Tuhre Lisa
Compliments Of The Season.
Dear Friend,
I am MRS. TUHRE LISA the wife of JOSEPH TUHRE who
was the special adviser to the former president of
Guinea Bissau who was short dead on 2nd of December
2000 by one of the rebels in Guinea.
Before the death of my husband JOS
Subscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to get info on the latest patches or
download from the CVS thing
Luzmu wrote:
People keep replying that patches like this and that exist but what I would
like to know is where can one get hold of them? So if someone knows,
please...
For me personally, the oper-only
What if we made IRCu use less CPU space? There are still clients out
there that have trouble with mIRC colors
Andreas Louca wrote:
A +c mode isnt hard to implement, but again ircu will waste useless cpu
cycles to scan the text and remove characters. imagine that being done in 10
channels with 10
A +c mode isnt hard to implement, but again ircu will waste useless cpu
cycles to scan the text and remove characters. imagine that being done in 10
channels with 10 lines of text/minute. Ircu will use all the cpu cycles to
"scan & clean" the text. It is easier to add such feature in a client,
rath
/wallchops test2
-> Ops #ddrr: test2
/onotice test3
-> Ops #ddrr: test3
Your host is Oslo1.NO.EU.undernet.org, running version u2.10.11.03
I couldn't reproduce the behavior using Mirc, it may be your script.
stoney`
At 01:21 PM 12/30/2002 +1300, you wrote:
[13:02] [13:01] -Season`d:@#zt- @ @
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 30 Dec 2002 10:47 am, you wrote:
> Yeah but sometimes clients tend to lock up @ the sight of mIRC code
Screwy and badly written clients aren't our problem.
- --
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
oper @ London.UK.EU.Under
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 30 Dec 2002 10:48 am, Tom Scott wrote:
> What if we let netopers make their own commands on the server? Like...
> /x or /xchan? Would that work?
Why?
- --
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
oper @ London.UK.EU.Undernet.Or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 30 Dec 2002 10:51 am, Tom Scott wrote:
> Yes! I have a follower ;-) Channel modes they are, but +o is a
> usermode...Why can't it be a channelmode too? +i is both... (invite and
> invisible)
+o is also already a channel mode, how do
Do you mind stickign to the point, I dont know about others on the list but
I don't feel like getting two copies of the same useless mail to my inbox.
-Luzmu
- Original Message -
From: "Bas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Luzmu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December
> Yes! I have a follower ;-) Channel modes they are, but +o is a
> usermode...Why can't it be a channelmode too? +i is both...
> (invite and
> invisible)
Because it already is.. You're already setting channel members +o (and
+v), I doubt you can reuse those modes again for another purpose.
> Been there, done that, one patch for .03 and even that (s-line) seems to
> f*ck up server-connections from the IP's defined in the S:lines.
>
this kind of patches are use at your own risk.
That message contained HTML, seems like /dev/null is full ;-)
-Luzmu
- Original Message -
From: Ciortea Cristian
To: Tom Scott
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 12:52 PM
Subject: Re: [Coder-Com] New Mode Ideas..should I include them in patch?
Erm there are already pa
Been there, done that, one patch for .03 and even that (s-line) seems to
f*ck up server-connections from the IP's defined in the S:lines.
-Luzmu
- Original Message -
From: "Bas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Luzmu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 1:03 P
Well I was just under the impression that making a mode without parameters
aside the chanop mode would be unneccesarily difficult (read: messy).
-Luzmu
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Luzmu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December
- Original Message -
From: "Luzmu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 11:28 AM
Subject: [Coder-Com] Patches, patches, patches...
> People keep replying that patches like this and that exist but what I
would
> like to know is where can one get hold
Erm there are already patches that implement +c and +C ( no ctcp ) for ircu. At least for .02 there were ;-). You could try and write them for .04 if the ones there are don`t work. The patches are @ http://cerberus.key2peace.org/patches
Tom Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey! I have some ideas f
Yes! I have a follower ;-) Channel modes they are, but +o is a
usermode...Why can't it be a channelmode too? +i is both... (invite and
invisible)
Luzmu wrote:
Just to make it clear, I assume you mean c and o to be channel-modes?
(Obviously o can't be used but then again you have though of that
Oh! Another thing...
What if we let netopers make their own commands on the server? Like...
/x or /xchan? Would that work?
- Necromncr
imad ennafii wrote:
hmmm..
sound interesting the +c chmode would be nice.
about the +O you are kinda late there is already a patch if you sets your chan +O onl
Too much overhead for the IRC servers and not really needed - if people don't
like the colours most clients will allow them to be stripped off. And
reducing the number of bans for using colours isn't really someting we're
concerned with - people should just learn to respect the rules of channel
People keep replying that patches like this and that exist but what I would
like to know is where can one get hold of them? So if someone knows,
please...
For me personally, the oper-only patch please?
-Luzmu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 30 Dec 2002 8:25 am, Tom Scott wrote:
> What if we had a mode +c (this is an example btw), for no mIRC colors?
> Before sending messages to the channel, it would check for mIRC
> colors...and strip them if +c was enabled. This would prevent
> What if we had a mode +c (this is an example btw), for no
> mIRC colors?
> Before sending messages to the channel, it would check for mIRC
> colors...and strip them if +c was enabled. This would prevent
> a lot of
> bans from occurring...
This wouldn't be implemented on Undernet because it
hmmm..
sound interesting the +c chmode would be nice.
about the +O you are kinda late there is already a patch if you sets your chan +O only
opers will be allowed to join the chan but im not sure if it works with .03
NeoWatch @ undernet.
NeoWatch @ dalnet.
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Url : Http
Just to make it clear, I assume you mean c and o to be channel-modes?
(Obviously o can't be used but then again you have though of that haven't
you ;-)). Also when writing this I came to think of a user mode like you
example on c, think bout it... :-)
Mode c will get some criticism for stress to th
Hey! I have some ideas for modes...
What if we had a mode +c (this is an example btw), for no mIRC colors?
Before sending messages to the channel, it would check for mIRC
colors...and strip them if +c was enabled. This would prevent a lot of
bans from occurring...
Another idea: A mode +o (yet
37 matches
Mail list logo
