RE: [Coder-Com] away not updating on remote servers

2003-03-03 Thread akl
On Mon, 2003-03-03 at 06:38, Tom Rons wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of bas > > Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 12:04 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [Coder-Com] away not updating on remote servers > > > > instead

Re: [Coder-Com] away not updating on remote servers

2003-03-03 Thread Kev
> > instead of a umode +a, maybe broadcasting a short fake away > > string like > > "-"? saving on umode chars and hassle... (making the "is away" remote > > whois only must be done first anyway) > > I believe IRCnet already uses mode +a to indicate away status, and > perhaps some other nets too,

Re: [Coder-Com] +x

2003-03-03 Thread Kev
> Got a little question about the +x mode. > It seems that some people are not able to log into the x mode or at least set > it on there Ip or whatever you may call it. Server admins are very strongly encouraged to have this user mode set to on, but it is not a requirement yet. This means that i

Re: [Coder-Com] away not updating on remote servers

2003-03-03 Thread Kev
> Kev wrote: > > > I recommend storing the away message locally only, making it only > > > available on a /whois , and using a user mode (+a) to > > > mark the user away remotely. This should solve our HIS problems > > > with away messages. (Plain away messages also had potential for > > > break

Re: [Coder-Com] +x]

2003-03-03 Thread Denise Gamache
Hi, I have put my egg with +x This is in my eggdrop.conf # script to run (if any) when first connecting to a server set init-server { putserv "MODE $botnick +ix-ws" } And I have made a tcl script that ident my egg to X if is not oped in chan that he have access. I admit that this script is not

RE: [Coder-Com] away not updating on remote servers

2003-03-03 Thread Tom Rons
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of bas > Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 12:04 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Coder-Com] away not updating on remote servers > > instead of a umode +a, maybe broadcasting a short fake away > string

[Coder-Com] +x

2003-03-03 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Good afternoon all, Got a little question about the +x mode. It seems that some people are not able to log into the x mode or at least set it on there Ip or whatever you may call it. We (some op's in a channel) are having a friendly bot in there who helps us out to keep the channel clean from

Re: [Coder-Com] away not updating on remote servers

2003-03-03 Thread s gibinski
Isomer wrote: > > If people set themselves /away multiple times only the first is > > broadcast to all servers. If I had my way, we wouldn't broadcast /away > > at all :) > Kev wrote: > I recommend storing the away message locally only, making it only > available on a /whois , and using a user m

Re: [Coder-Com] away not updating on remote servers

2003-03-03 Thread bas
Kev wrote: > > > If people set themselves /away multiple times only the first is > > broadcast to all servers. If I had my way, we wouldn't broadcast /away > > at all :) > > I recommend storing the away message locally only, making it only > available on a /whois , and using a user mode (+a)

Re: [Coder-Com] away not updating on remote servers

2003-03-03 Thread Isomer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > > If people set themselves /away multiple times only the first is > > broadcast to all servers. If I had my way, we wouldn't broadcast /away > > at all :) > > I recommend storing the away message locally only, making it only > available on a /whois