On Jun 5, 2004, at 5:47 AM, Jeekay wrote:
On Sat, 5 Jun 2004, Marcus Lindgren wrote:
Seems to be a small bug in X,
[11:11] -> *x* ban #mIRC [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1 100 test
[11:11] -X- I can't find [EMAIL PROTECTED] on channel #mirc
seems X do not like ban masks with the new longer 12 letter nicknames
On Sat, 5 Jun 2004, Jeekay wrote:
> > seems X do not like ban masks with the new longer 12 letter nicknames
Actually on this note, how feasible would it be to add a new (parameter to
SERVER / token) that defines all these things? Like the ISUPPORT part of
the c<->s protocol.
That way, servers c
On Sat, 5 Jun 2004, Marcus Lindgren wrote:
> Seems to be a small bug in X,
>
> [11:11] -> *x* ban #mIRC [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1 100 test
> [11:11] -X- I can't find [EMAIL PROTECTED] on channel #mirc
>
> seems X do not like ban masks with the new longer 12 letter nicknames
--- orig/mod.cservice/cser