Aaron Kaufman writes:
> It's probably bad form to explain on an open list how to use a bug to map
> out the network... : )
There is [EMAIL PROTECTED] if one is so inclined. When one thinks
there is a bug, it is generally useful to convince at least one of the
maintainers that the behavior in que
It's probably bad form to explain on an open list how to use a bug to map
out the network... : )
-AK
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Michael Poole
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 3:32 PM
To: coder-com@undernet.org
Subject: Re: [Coder-com] P
Andrew Miller writes:
> Progs wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>If I have two servers, AA and AB, with A and ABAAA on #foo, a +D channel.
>>A is delayed on #foo and ABAAA is +d.
>>There are only A and ABAAA in #foo.
>>When A speaks on #foo, ABAAA is +d so AB doesn't receive message, so
>>ABAAA
